This study focuses on externalities of exchanges of voting positions in collective decision-making. Exchanges are represented by non-constant two-person cooperative games. It is assumed that the rate of exchange is specified by the Raiffa-Kalai-Smorodinsky solution, and a model is specified to identify the exchanges. Externality effects of these exchanges are assessed with two conflict measures we develop here. The measures assess within-group and between-group conflict, respectively, and are applied to collective decision-making in the European Union regarding support for fishery infrastructure. The application shows that the measures provide indispensable insights into the decision-making setting and that these can be used for strategic intervention in the setting. It also shows that both actors' power and the outcomes in exchange with externalities are very different from those in exchange without externalities as studied by theories of network exchange.
Bienenstock, E.J.
and P. Bonacich. 1992. `The Core as a Solution to Exclusionary Networks.' Social Networks14: 231-243.
2.
Braun, N.1994. `Restricted Access in Exchange Systems.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology19: 129-148.
3.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.1994. `Political Forecasting: An Expected Utility Method.' In European Community Decision Making. Models, Comparisons, and Applications, eds B. Bueno de Mesquita and F.N. Stokman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.2000. Principles of International Politics: People's Power, Preferences, and Perceptions. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
5.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.
and D. Lalman. 1986. `Reason and War.' American Political Science Review80: 1113-1129.
6.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.
and D. Lalman. 1992. War and Reason. Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, B.
, D. Newman, and A. Rabushka. 1985. Forecasting Political Events. The Future of Hong Kong. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Coleman, J.S.1972. `Systems of Social Exchange.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology2: 145-163.
9.
Coleman, J.S.1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Cook, K.S.
and R.M. Emerson. 1978. `Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks.' American Sociological Review43: 721-739.
11.
Cook, K.S.
, R.M. Emerson, M.R. Gillmore, and T. Yamagishi. 1983. `The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results.' American Journal of Sociology89: 275-305.
12.
Cook, K.S.
and T. Yamagishi. 1992. `Power in Exchange Networks: a Power-Dependence Formulation.' Social Networks14: 245-265.
13.
Emerson, R.M.
, K.S. Cook, M.R. Gillmore, and T. Yamagishi. 1983. `Valid Predictions from Invalid Comparisons: Responses to Heckathorn.' Social Forces61: 1232-1247.
14.
Friedkin, N.E.1992. `An Expected Value Model of Social Power: Predictions for Selected Exchange Networks.' Social Networks14: 213-229.
15.
Heckathorn, D.D.1980. `A Unified Model for Bargaining and Conflict.' Behavioral Science25: 261-284.
16.
Heckathorn, D.D.1983a. `Extensions of Power-Dependence Theory: The Concept of Resistance.' Social Forces61: 1206-1231.
17.
Heckathorn, D.D.1983b. `Valid and Invalid Interpersonal Comparisons: Response to Emerson, Cook, Gillmore and Yamagishi.' Social Forces61: 1248-1259.
18.
Heckathorn, D.D.1985. `Power and Trust in Social Exchange.' Advances in Group Processes2: 143-166.
19.
Holt, C.A.1995. `Industrial Organization: a Survey of Laboratory Research.' In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth, pp. 349-443. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Homans, G.C.1958. `Social Behavior as Exchange.' Journal of American Sociology62: 597-606.
21.
Homans, G.C.1974. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
22.
Kalai, E.
and M. Smorodinsky. 1975. `Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem.' Econometrica43: 513-518.
23.
Kreps, D.M.1990. A Course in Micro-economic Theory. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
24.
Markovsky, B.1987. `Toward Multilevel Sociological Theories: Simulations of Actor and Network Effects.' Sociological Theory5: 100-115.
25.
Marsden, P.V.1983. `Restricted Access in Networks and Models of Power.' American Journal of Sociology4: 686-717.
26.
Molm, L.D.1994. `Dependence and Risk: Transforming the Structure of Social Exchange.' Social Psychology Quarterly57: 163-176.
27.
Molm, L.D.1997. Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raiffa, H.1953. `Arbitration Schemes for Generalized Two-Person Games.' In Contribution to the Theory of Games. II: Annals of Mathematics Studies, eds H.W. Kuhn and A. Tucker. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Roth, A.E.1995. `Bargaining Experiments.' In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth, pp. 253-348. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Skvoretz, J.
and D. Willer. 1993. `Exclusion and Power: a Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange Networks.' American Sociological Review58: 801-818.
32.
Stokman, F.N.
and J.V. Stokman. 1995. `Strategic Control and Interests. Its Effects on Decision Outcomes.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology20: 289-317.
33.
Stokman, F.N.
, M.A.L.M van Assen, J. van der Knoop, and R.C.H. van Oosten. 2000. `Strategic Decision Making.' Advances in Group Processes17: 131-153.
34.
Stokman, F.N.
and J.M.M. van den Bos. 1992. `A Two-Stage Model of Policy Making: with an Empirical Test in the U.S. Energy Policy Domain.' In The Political Consequences of Social Networks, volume 4 of Research and Society, eds G. Moore and J.A. Whitt, pp. 219-253. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
35.
Stokman, F.N.
and R. van Oosten. 1994. `The Exchange of Voting Positions: An Object-Oriented Model of Policy Networks.' In European Community Decision Making. Models, Comparisons, and Applications, eds B. Bueno de Mesquita and F.N. Stokman, pp. 105-127. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
Stokman, F.N.
and E.P.H. Zeggelink. 1996. `Is Politics Power or Policy Oriented? A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Access Models in Policy Networks.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology21: 77-111.
37.
Sunder, S.1995. `Experimental Asset Markets: a Survey.' In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth, pp. 445-500. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Van Assen, M.A.L.M.2001. Essays on Actor Models in Exchange Networks and Social Dilemmas. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
39.
Willer, D.1992. `Predicting Power in Exchange Networks: a Brief History and Introduction to the Issues.' Social Networks14: 187-211.
40.
Willer, D.
, ed. 1999. Network Exchange Theory. Westport: Praeger.
41.
Willer, D.
and B. Anderson. 1981. Networks, Exchange and Coercion: The Elementary Theory and its Applications. North Holland: Elsevier.
42.
Willer, D.
, B. Markovsky, and T. Patton. 1989. `Power Structures: Deviations and Applications of Elementary Theory.' In Sociological Theories in Progress, 3, eds J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., and B. Anderson, pp. 313-353). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
43.
Young, O.R.1975. Bargaining: Formal Theories of Negotiation. Illinois, IL: University of Illinois Press.
