This article focuses on the relationship between the costs of norm enforcement and the extent to which such enforcement actually occurs. We predict that as costs increase, sanctioning of deviant behavior is less likely. In addition, however, costs have a positive effect on the strength of meta-norms that encourage sanctioning. These meta-norms, in turn, lead to more frequent enforcement. Hypotheses are tested using experimental methods and, for the most part, are supported.
Axelrod, R.1986. `An Evolutionary Approach to Norms.' American Political Science Review80: 1095-1111.
2.
Coleman, J. S.1990. Fundamentals of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Ellickson, R. C.1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Elster, J.1989. The Cement of Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Emerson, R. M.1962. `Power-Dependence Relations.' American Sociological Review27: 31-41.
6.
Emerson, R. M.1972. `Exchange Theory, Part II: Exchange Relations and Network Structures.' In Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. 2, eds Joseph Berger, Morris Zelditch, Jr. and Bo Anderson, pp. 58-87. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
7.
Flache, A.
and M. W. Macy. 1996. `The Weakness of Strong Ties: Collective Action Failure in a Highly Cohesive Group.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology21(1): 3-28.
8.
Hechter, M.1987. Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
Heckathorn, D. D.1988. `Collective Sanctions and the Creation of Prisoner's Dilemma Norms.' American Journal of Sociology94(3): 535-562.
10.
Heckathorn, D. D.1990. `Collective Sanctions and Compliance Norms: A Formal Theory of Group-Mediated Social Control.' American Sociological Review55: 366-384.
11.
Heckathorn, D. D.1991. `Extensions of the Prisoner's Dilemma Paradigm: The Altruist's Dilemma and Group Solidarity.' Sociological Theory9: 34-52.
12.
Homans, George C.1951. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt Brace.
13.
Homans, George C.1974. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
14.
Horne, C.2000. `Community and the State: The Relationship between Normative and Legal Controls.' European Sociological Review16(3): 225-243.
15.
Horne, C.2001a. `Sociological Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Norms.' In Social Norms, eds M. Hechter and K. Opp, pp. 3-34. New York: Russell Sage.
16.
Horne, C. 2001b. `The Enforcement of Norms: Group Cohesion and Meta-Norms.' Social Psychology Quarterly.
17.
Macauley, Stewart
. 1963. `Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.' American Sociological Review28: 55-67.
18.
Mackie, G.1996. `Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account.' American Sociological Review61(6): 999-1017.
19.
Molm, L.1997. Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Oliver, P.1980. `Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical Investigations.' American Journal of Sociology85: 1356-1375.
21.
Portes, A.1998. `Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.' Annual Review of Sociology24: 1-24.
22.
Posner, E. A.2000. Law and Social Norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Sampson, R. J.
, S. W. Raudenbush and F. Earls. 1997. `Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy.' Science277: 918-924.
24.
Scott, J. F.1971. Internalization of Norms: A Sociological Theory of Moral Commitment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25.
Tyler, T.
and R. J. Boeckman. 1997. `Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers.' Law and Society Review31(2): 237-265.
26.
Yamagishi, T.1986. `The Provision of a Sanctioning System as a Public Good.' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 110-116.
27.
Yamagishi, T.1995. `Social Dilemmas.' In Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, eds Karen S. Cook, Gary Alan Fine, and James S. House, pp. 311-335. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
