This article reviews and critiques pediatric oncology family nursing research and suggests advancing the research basis of pediatric oncology family nursing practice. The article is organized around the conceptual issues that challenge family nurse researchers, the methods used in reviewing the literature, instrumentation that reflects conceptual issues, findings, and suggestions. Methodological issues abound in this literature and some shared findings across studies do exist: parenting is a concern of all family members; family communication problems have been identified from several perspectives; and increased stress at some points in treatment is reported by all members of the family. Coping is an area of limited agreement and adjustment is poorly articulated in this literature. Longitudinal studies, improved instrumentation, use of triangulation, and publication of more complicated data sets that include family measurement are recommended to advance the scientific basis of pediatric oncology family nursing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Johnson DE: Is nursing meeting the challenge of family needs? Presented at "Community Mental Health Concepts for Nurse Leaders," Las Vegas, Nevada, 1966
2.
Cooper HM: Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. RevEduc Res52:291-302, 1982
3.
Feetham SLFamily research: Issues and directions for nursing. Ann Rev Nurs Res2:3-25, 1984
4.
Feetham S.: Conceptual and methodological issues in research of families, in Whall A, Fawcett J (eds): Family Theory Development in Nursing: State of the Science and Art, Philadelphia, PA, FA Davis , 1991, pp 55-84
5.
Gilliss CLFamily nursing research, theory and practice. Image J Nurs Sch23:19-22, 1991
6.
McCalla JL, Santacroce SJ, Wollery-Antill M.: Nursing support of the child with cancer, in Pizzo PA, Poplack DG (eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology (ed 2). Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott , 1993, pp 1059-1078
7.
Gilliss CL: The family as a unit of analysis: Strategies for the nurse researcher. Community EnvironHealth5:50-59, 1983
8.
Stallings RA: Hospital adaptations to disaster: Flow models, in Hasenfeld Y, English RA (eds): Human Service Organizations: A Book of Readings. Ann Arbor, MI, The University of Michigan, 1983 pp 284-297
9.
Birenbaum LK: Effects of family nursing on sibling response to dying: Final Report Grant #5R01 MU00912 and #5R01 NU00912-02S. Division of Nursing. Health and Human Services. Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, 1987
10.
Whall AL: Congruence between existing theories of family functioning and nursing theories . Adv Nurs Sci2:59-67, 1980
11.
Murphy S.: State of the Science: Family Study and Nursing Research. Image J Nurs Sch18:170-174, 1986
12.
Fife B., Lancaster W.: Understanding leukemic children's coping behavior within the family context: Two case presentations. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs7:45-57, 1984
13.
Spinetta JJ, Deasy PM: Coping with childhood cancer: Professional and family communication patterns , in Eisenberg MG, Falconer J, Sutkin LC (eds): Communications in a Health Care Setting. Springfield, IL , Thomas, 1980, pp 173-205
14.
Sourkes BM: Siblings of the pediatric cancer patient, in Kellerman J (ed): Psychological Aspects of Childhood Cancer . Springfield, IL, Thomas, 1980, pp 47-69
15.
Birenbaum LK : The relationship between parent-sibling communication and coping of siblings with death experience. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs6:86-91, 1989
16.
Lewis F.: Family-level services for the cancer patient: Critical distinctions fallacies, and assessment. Cancer Nurs6:193-220. 1983
17.
Uphold CR, StricklandOl: Issues related to the unit of analysis to family nursing research. WestJ Nurs Res11:405-417, 1989
18.
Birenbaum LK: Description of family communication about chronic illness in children with cancer. Dissertation, University of Washington, 1987 (University Microfilms No. AAl8810506)
19.
Driever MJ, Birenbaum LK: Patton's utilization focused evaluation as the basis of the quality assurance process.
20.
Hayes VE: Nursing science in family care, in Feetham SL, Meister SB, Bell JM, et al (eds): The Nursing of Families: Theory/Research/Education/Practice . Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1993 pp 18-29
21.
Martinson IM: Personal communication, April 22, 1994
22.
Smith CE, Garvis MS, Martinson IM: Content analysis of interviews using a nursing model: A look at parents adapting to the impact of childhood cancer. Cancer Nurs8: 269-275, 1983
23.
Rudin MM, Martinson IM, Gilliss CL: Measurement of psychosocial concerns of adolescents with cancer. Cancer Nurs11:144-149, 1988
24.
Martinson IM , Gilliss C., Colaizzo DC, et al: Impact of childhood cancer on healthy school-age siblings. Cancer Nurs12:183-190, 1990
25.
Clarke-Steffen L.: Waiting and not knowing: The diagnosis of cancer in a child. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs10:146-153, 1993
26.
Sudman S., Bradburn NM: Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 1989, pp 148-172, 207-228
27.
Fife BL, Huhman M., Keck J.: Development of a clinical assessment scale evaluation of the psychosocial impact of childhood illness on the family. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs9:11-31, 1986
28.
Birenbaum LK : Family coping with childhood cancer. Hospice J6:17-33, 1990
29.
Kazdin AD: Research Design in Clinical Psychology. New York, NY, Harper and Row, 1980, p 232
30.
Lovejoy N.: The leukemic child's perceptions of family behaviors. Oncol Nurs Forum10:20-25, 1993
31.
Grubbs J.: The Johnson behavioral system model, in Riehl JP, Roy C (eds): Conceptual Models for Nursing Practice. New York, NY, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1974, pp 160-197
32.
Bossert E., Martinson IM: Kinetic family drawings-revised: A method of determining the impact of cancer on the family as perceived by the child with cancer. J Pediatr Nurs5:204-213, 1990
Cornman BJ: Impact of childhood cancer on the family. Ann Arbor, Ml , UMI Dissertation Services, 1988 (University Microfilms no. AAl8810518)
35.
Nunnally JC: Psychometric Theory. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978
36.
Cornman BJ: Childhood cancer: Differential effects on the family members. Oncol Nurs Forum20:1559-1566, 1993
37.
Thoma ME, Hockenberry-Eaton M., Kemp V.: Life change events and coping behaviors in families of children with cancer . J Pediatr Oncol Nurs10:105-111, 1993
38.
Cunningham C., Betsa N., Gross S.: Sibling group: Interaction with siblings of oncology patients. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol3:135-139, 1991
39.
Koocher GP, O'Malley JE: The Damocles Syndrome: Psychosocial Consequences of Surviving Childhood Cancer. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1981
40.
Birenbaum LK ; Robinson MA, Phillips DS, et al: The response of children to the dying and death of a sibling. Omega: J Death Dying20:86-91, 1989-90
41.
Birenbaum LK , Robinson MA: Family relationships in two types of terminal care. Soc Sci Med32:95-102, 1991 42. Fife B., Norton J., Groom G.: The family's adaptation to childhood leukemia. Soc Sci Med24:159-168, 1987
42.
Cohen D., Blotcky A., Conatser C., et al: Psychosocial and family characteristics of adolescents who refuse cancer treatmentJ Pediatr Oncol Nurs329-30, 1985
43.
Lansky SB, Cairns NU, Hassanem R., et al: Childhood cancer: Parental discord and divorce. Pediatrics62:184-188, 1978
44.
Spanier GB: Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales of assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam38:15-28, 1976
45.
McCubbin H., Patterson J.: Systematic Assessment of Family Stress, Resources, and Coping: Tools for Research, Education, and Clinical Intervention. St Paul, MN, University of Minnesota, 1983, pp 77-91
