Feasibility,Acceptability,and Clinical Implementation of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention to Address Psychological Well-Being in Children and Adolescents With Cancer

Abstract

Objective: Virtual reality (VR), a novel and highly immersive technology, offers promise in addressing potential psychological impacts of cancer treatments and hospitalization. The primary aim of this study was to examine multiple key user perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of an Immersive VR therapeutic intervention for use with hospitalized patients with cancer. Secondary aims were to identify issues and opportunities related to the adoption and clinical implementation of VR in pediatric oncology settings. Method: The study was conducted at The Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH), Melbourne, Australia. Thirty multidisciplinary oncology health care professionals participated in an initial test of VR intervention usability (Stage 1). Ninety oncology inpatients (7-19 years) and their parent caregivers participated in a pilot randomized controlled study to examine the effectiveness of an Immersive VR therapeutic intervention (Stage 2). This mixed methods study reports Stages 1 and 2 quantitative and qualitative data related to VR feasibility and acceptability. Results: Results indicate favorable perceptions from health care professionals with respect to ease of use and usefulness of VR, and had positive intentions to use it in the future. Parent caregivers reported high acceptability of VR for their hospitalized child. Patients reported high satisfaction of the VR intervention within minimal adverse effects. Barriers and facilitators to VR use with seriously ill children and specific recommendations for content development were elicited. Conclusion: This study shows that there are several potential clinical uses for Immersive VR intervention, beyond medical procedural distraction, to support psychological adjustment to hospitalization and patient quality of life.

Keywords

virtual reality hospitalization pediatric oncology psychological

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bertrand

Bouchard

(2008). Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of Cyber Therapy & Rehabilitation, 1(2), 200-210. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-11191-008

Birnie

K. A.

Kulandaivelu

Jibb

Hroch

Positano

Robertson

Campbell

Abla

Stinson

(2018). Usability testing of an interactive virtual reality distraction intervention to reduce procedural pain in children and adolescents with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 35(6), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043454218782138

Bultz

B. D.

Waller

Cullum

Jones

Halland

Groff

S. L.

Leckie

Shirt

Blanchard

Lau

Easaw

Fassbender

Carlson

L. E.

(2013). Implementing routine screening for distress, the sixth vital sign, for patients with head and neck and neurologic cancers. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 11(10), 1249-1261. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2013.0147

Chan

E. A.

Chung

J. W. Y.

Wong

T. K. S.

Lien

A. S. Y.

Yang

J. Y.

(2007). Application of a virtual reality prototype for pain relief of pediatric burn in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(4), 786-793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01719.x

Cummings

J. J.

Bailenson

J. N.

(2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740

Das

D. A.

Grimmer

K. A.

Sparnon

A. L.

McRae

S. E.

Thomas

B. H.

(2005). The efficacy of playing a virtual reality game in modulating pain for children with acute burn injuries: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN87413556]. BMC Pediatrics, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-5-1

Dascal

Reid

Ishak

W. W.

Spiegel

Recacho

Rosen

Danovitch

(2017). Virtual reality and medical inpatients: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1/2), 14-21. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-11757-003

Davis

F. D.

(1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dejong

Fombonne

(2006). Depression in paediatric cancer: An overview. Psycho-Oncology, 15(7), 553-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1002

10.

Gershon

Zimand

Pickering

Rothbaum

B. O.

Hodges

(2004). A pilot and feasibility study of virtual reality as a distraction for children with cancer. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(10), 1243-1249. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000135621.23145.05

11.

Glegg

S. M. N.

Holsti

Velikonja

Ansley

Brum

Sartor

(2013). Factors influencing therapists’ adoption of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(5), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.1506

12.

Glegg

S. M. N.

Levac

D. E.

(2018). Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support virtual reality implementation in rehabilitation: A scoping review. PM&R, 10(11), 1237-1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.07.004

13.

Gold

J. I.

Kim

S. H.

Kant

A. J.

Joseph

M. H.

Rizzo

A. S.

(2006). Effectiveness of virtual reality for pediatric pain distraction during IV placement. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(2), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.207

14.

Harris

P. A.

Taylor

Thielke

Payne

Gonzalez

Conde

J. G.

(2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap): A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

15.

Hoeft

R. M.

Vogel

Bowers

C. A.

(2003). Kids get sick too: A proposed child simulator sickness questionnaire. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 47(20), 2137-2141. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120304702013

16.

Hoffman

H. G.

Doctor

J. N.

Patterson

D. R.

Carrougher

G. J.

Furness

T. A.

III . (2000). Virtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during burn wound care in adolescent patients. Pain, 85(1-2), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00275-4

17.

Holden

R. J.

Karsh

B.-T.

(2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002

18.

Hollis

Morriss

Martin

Amani

Cotton

Denis

Lewis

(2015). Technological innovations in mental healthcare: Harnessing the digital revolution. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(4), 263-265. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142612

19.

Hua

Qiu

Yao

W.-y.

Zhang

Chen

X.-l.

(2015). The effect of virtual reality distraction on pain relief during dressing changes in children with chronic wounds on lower limbs. Pain Management Nursing, 16(5), 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2015.03.001

20.

Jeffs

Dorman

Brown

Files

Graves

Kirk

Meredith-Neve

Sanders

White

Swearingen

C. J.

(2014). Effect of virtual reality on adolescent pain during burn wound care. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 35(5), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000019

21.

Kazak

A. E.

Noll

R. B.

(2015). The integration of psychology in pediatric oncology research and practice: Collaboration to improve care and outcomes for children and families. American Psychologist, 70(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035695

22.

Kipping

Rodger

Miller

Kimble

R. M.

(2012). Virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Burns, 38(5), 650-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.11.010

23.

Kuo

(2016). Brave new world of warcraft: A conceptual framework for active escapism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(7), 498-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-04-2016-1775

24.

Langhan

M. L.

Riera

Kurtz

J. C.

Schaeffer

Asnes

A. G.

(2015). Implementation of newly adopted technology in acute care settings: A qualitative analysis of clinical staff. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 39(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2014.973618

25.

W. H.

Chung

J. O.

E. K.

(2011). The effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in promoting the psychological well-being of children hospitalised with cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(15-16), 2135-2143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03733.x

26.

Lyon

A. R.

Wasse

J. K.

Ludwig

Zachry

Bruns

E. J.

Unützer

McCauley

(2016). The contextualized technology adaptation process (CTAP): Optimizing health information technology to improve mental health systems. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43(3), 394-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0637-x

27.

Mahrer

N. E.

Gold

J. I.

(2009). The use of virtual reality for pain control: A review. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 13(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-009-0019-8

28.

Malloy

K. M.

Milling

L. S.

(2010). The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(8), 1011-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001

29.

Markus

L. A.

Willems

K. E.

Maruna

C. C.

Schmitz

C. L.

Pellino

T. A.

Wish

J. R.

Faucher

L. D.

Schurr

M. J.

Schurr

M. J.

(2009). Virtual reality: Feasibility of implementation in a regional burn center. Burns, 35(7), 967-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.01.013

30.

Parsons

T. D.

Rizzo

A. A.

Rogers

York

(2009). Virtual reality in paediatric rehabilitation: A review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12(4), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518420902991719

31.

Ravi

D. K.

Kumar

Singhi

(2017). Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: An updated evidence-based systematic review. Physiotherapy, 103(3), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.08.004

32.

Rizzo

Koenig

S. T.

(2017). Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime? Neuropsychology, 31(8), 877-899. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000405

33.

Rourke

M. T.

Hobbie

W. L.

Schwartz

Kazak

A. E.

(2007). Posttrauamatic stress disorder (PTSD) in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 49(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20942

34.

Rourke

M. T.

Samson

K. K.

Kazak

A. E.

(2015). Psychological aspects of long-term survivorship. In Schwartz

Hobbie

Constine

Ruccione

(Eds.), Pediatric oncology: Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer (pp. 295-304). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16435-9_20

35.

Rourke

M. T.

Stuber

M. L.

Hobbie

W. L.

Kazak

A. E.

(1999). Posttraumatic stress disorder: Understanding the psychosocial impact of surviving childhood cancer into young adulthood. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 16(3), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/104345429901600303

36.

Sander Wint

Eshelman

Steele

Guzzetta

C. E

. (2002). Effects of distraction using virtual reality glasses during lumbar punctures in adolescents with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29(1), E8-E15. https://doi.org/10.1188/02.ONF.E8-E15

37.

Schmitt

Y. S.

Hoffman

H. G.

Blough

D. K.

Patterson

D. R.

Jensen

M. P.

Soltani

Carrougher

G. J.

Nakamura

Sharar

S. R.

(2011). A randomized, controlled trial of immersive virtual reality analgesia, during physical therapy for pediatric burns. Burns, 37(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.007

38.

Schneider

S. M.

Workman

M. L.

(1999). Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving chemotherapy. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2(2), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.125

39.

Schneider

S. M.

Workman

M. L.

(2000). Virtual reality as a distraction intervention for older children receiving chemotherapy. Pediatric Nursing, 26(6), 593-597. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12026359

40.

Sharar

S. R.

Miller

Teeley

Soltani

Hoffman

H. G.

Jensen

M. P.

Patterson

D. R.

(2008). Applications of virtual reality for pain management in burn-injured patients. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 8(11), 1667-1674. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.8.11.1667

41.

Strauss

Corbin

J. M.

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.

42.

Sun

Zhang

(2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013

43.

Tarnowski

K. J.

Simonian

S. J.

(1992). Assessing treatment acceptance: The abbreviated acceptability rating profile. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23(2), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(92)90007-6

44.

Tennant

Youssef

G. J.

McGillivray

Clark

T.-J.

McMillan

McCarthy

(2020, February 19). Exploring the use of immersive virtual reality to enhance psychological wellbeing in pediatric oncology. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hujgz

45.

Weinstein

A. G.

Henrich

C. C.

(2013). Psychological interventions helping pediatric oncology patients cope with medical procedures: A nurse-centered approach. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17(6), P726-P731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2013.04.003

46.

Wiener

Kazak

A. E.

Noll

R. B.

Patenaude

A. F.

Kupst

M. J.

(2015). Standards for the psychosocial care of children with cancer and their families: An introduction to the special issue. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 62(S5), S419-S424. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25675

47.

Wolitzky

Fivush

Zimand

Hodges

Rothbaum

B. O.

(2005). Effectiveness of virtual reality distraction during a painful medical procedure in pediatric oncology patients. Psychology and Health, 20(6), 817-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500143339

48.

Won

Bailey

Bailenson

Tataru

Yoon

Golianu

(2017). Immersive virtual reality for pediatric pain. Children, 4(7), Article 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/children4070052

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB