Human Suffering: The Need for Relationship-Based Research in Pediatric End-of-Life Care

Abstract

Children living with and dying from advanced cancer and their families experience significant suffering. The cure of disease and the relief of suffering are dual moral obligations of our professions. To relieve suffering, health care providers must understand the multiple dimensions of the person who suffers and the complex set of relationships within the natural and the clinical social networks. Pediatric oncology research must include appropriately designed studies with sound methodology and measurement strategies to test and refine theories that account for the link between human relationships and the relief of suffering. Studies should assess as many theoretical models as possible, including the social network, perceptions of support, and provider-recipient interactions; their physical, emotional, behavioral, and spiritual concomitants; and their impact on medical decision making and health outcomes. Future directions in pediatric end-of-life care research must also include evaluating social and spiritual interventions developed on the basis of solid hypotheses regarding the positive and negative influences of interpersonal dynamics on the processes that mediate between suffering and well-being.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antonucci, T. C. (1985). Social support: Theoretical advances, recent findings and pressing issues. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and application (pp. 21-37). Boston: Nijhoff.

Argyle, M. (1992). Benefits produced by supportive relationships. In H. O. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support. (pp. 13-32). New York: Hemisphere.

Brenneis, J. M. (1997). Spirituality and suffering. In W. C. Parris (Ed.), Cancer pain management (p. 551). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Brissett, I., Cohen, S., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). Measuring social integration and social networks. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (p. 53). New York: Oxford University Press.

Byock, I. R. (1996). The nature of suffering and the nature of opportunity at the end of life. Clinical Geriatric Medicine, 12, 237-252.

Cassel, E. J. (1982). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 302, 639-645.

Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300-313.

Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269-297.

Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., & Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Cohen, S., & Willis, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.

11.

Cutrona, C. E., & Cole, V. (2000). Optimizing support in the natural network. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (p. 278). New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Hupcey, J. E. (1998, June). Clarifying the social support theory research linkage. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(6), 1231-1241.

13.

Hutchison, C. (1999, June). Social Support: Factors to consider when designing studies that measure social support. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(6), 1520-1526.

14.

Ishibashi, A. (2001, February). The needs of children and adolescents with cancer for information and social support. Cancer Nursing, 24(1), 61-67.

15.

Johnson, J. (2000, August). An overview of psychosocial support services. Resources for healing. Cancer Nursing, 23(4), 310-313.

16.

Kahn, R. L. (1994). Social support: content, causes and consequences. In R. P. Abeles, H. C. Gift, & M. G. Ory (Eds.), Aging and Quality of Life (pp. 163-184). New York: Springer.

17.

Kane, J. R. (2000). Spirituality in medicine. San Antonio Medicine, 53, 11-13.

18.

Kane, J. R., & Primomo, M. (2001). Alleviating the suffering of seriously ill children. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 18, 1-19.

19.

Langford, C. P., Bowsher, J., Maloney, J. P., & Lillis, P. P. (1997, January). Social support: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(1), 95-100.

20.

Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practices. New York: Guilford.

21.

Procidano, M. E., & Heller, K. (1983). Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 1-24.

22.

Reis, H. T., & Collins, N. (2000). Measuring relationship properties and interactions relevant to social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (p. 136). New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiarty, 57, 316-362.

24.

Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing the conceptual gap. Journal of Social Science, 40, 11-36.

25.

Skilbeck, J., & Payne, S. (2003, September). Emotional support and the role for clinical nurse specialists in palliative care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(5), 521-530.

26.

Sulmasy, D. P. (2002, October). A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life. Gerontologist, 42(3), 24-33.

27.

Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48, 174-187.

28.

Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986). Perceived support, received support and adjustment to stressful events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 78-89.

29.

Wolfe, J. W., Grier, H. E., Klar, N., Levin, S. B., Ellenbogen, J. M., Salem-Shatz, S., et al. (2000, February 3). Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(5), 326-333.