This paper reviewed several barriers to the development of a work study option for students labeled mildly mentally retarded. These barriers included: the debate over the existence of the entity mental retardation, the relationship of political | economic factors and schooling, the purpose and content of secondary education, and the interaction of personal values with these factors. Tentative conclusions include: mental retardation is an entity; this condition is defined by social context; social systems (such as education) can make a difference; and, on the whole, special education is a “good thing.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AffleckJ. Q., EdgarE., LevineP., & KorteringL. (1990). Postschool status of students classified as mildly mentally retarded, learning disabled, or nonhandicapped: Does it get better with time?Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 315–324.
2.
BarrM. W. (1899). The how, the why, and the wherefore of the training of feeble-minded chil-dren. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 4, 204–212.
3.
BlattB. (1982). The conquest of mental retardation. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
4.
BowlesS., & GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BrownG. A. (1898). President's annual address. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 3, 1–11.
6.
CruickshankW. M. (1986). Disputable decisions in special education. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
7.
DingerJ. (1961). Post school adjustment of former educable retarded pupils. Exceptional Children, 27, 353–360.
8.
DollE. E. (1962). A historical survey of research and management of mental retardation in the United States. In TruppE. P. & HimelsteinP. (Eds.), Readings on the exceptional child. New York: Appleton-Century-Crotts, Inc.
9.
DunnL. M. (Ed.) (1963). Exceptional children in the schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
11.
EdgarE. (1988). Employment as an outcome for mildly handicapped students: Current status and future directions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21(1), 1–8.
12.
EdgarE. (1991). Social justice and the search for eq-uity for persons with disabilities. Paper presented to Project Director's Meeting, Washington, D.C.
13.
EdgarE., & HaydenA. H. (1985). Who are the children special education should serve and how many children are there?Journal of Special Education, 18, 523–539.
14.
EdgarE., HeggelandM., & FischerM. (1988). A longitudinal study of graduates of special education preschool: Educational placement after pre-school. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8, 61–74.
15.
FarberB. (1968). Mental retardation: Its social context and social consequences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
FinnC. E. (1986). A fresh option for the non-col-lege-bound. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(4), 234–238.
17.
FittsA. M. (1916). How to fill the gap between the special class and institutions. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 20, 78–87.
18.
FittsA. M. (1917). The function of the special classes for mentally defective children in the public schools. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 21, 94–98.
19.
FornessS. R., & KavaleK. A. (1984). Education of the mentally retarded: A note on policy. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 239–245.
20.
GouldS. J. (1982). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.
21.
HalpernA. S. (1992). Transition: Old wine in new bottles. Exceptional Children, 58, 202–211.
22.
HellerK., HoltzmanW., & MessickS. (Eds.) (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
23.
HohlerB. (1991). Buchanan softens stance on homeless. The Seattle Times, Thursday, December 26, 1991, A8.
24.
HuttM. L., & GibbyR. G. (1958). The mentally retarded child. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
25.
IngramC. P. (1960). Education of the slow-learning child. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
26.
JensenA. R. (1969). How much can we boast IQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.
27.
JohnsonG. O. (1963). Psychological characteris-tics of the mentally retarded. In CruickshankW. M. (Ed.), Psychology of exceptional children and youth (2nd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
28.
KerckhoffA. C., CampbellR. T., TrottJ. M., & KrausV. (1989). The transmission of socioeco-nomic status and prestige in Great Britain and the United States. Sociological Forum, 4, 155–177.
29.
KirkS. A., & JohnsonG. O. (1951). Educating the retarded child. Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press.
30.
KolstoeO., & FreyR. (1965). A high school work study program for mentally retarded students. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
31.
KozalJ. (1991). Savage inequalities. New York: Crown Publishers.
32.
MacMillanD. L. (1988). Issues in mild mental re-tardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 273–284.
33.
MercerJ. R. (1973). Labeling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California.
34.
MercerJ. R. (1974). A policy statement on assess-ment procedures and the right of children. Harvard Educational Review, 44, 125–141.
35.
MercerJ. R. (1979). SOMPA: System of multicultural pluralistic assessment. New York: The Psychologi-cal Corporation.
36.
Minutes of the 41st annual session of the American Association for the Study of Feeble-minded. (1917). Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 22, 20–59.
37.
PhillipsK. (1991). The politics of the rich and poor. New York: Harper Collins.
38.
PollowayE. R., & SmithJ. D. (1983). Changes in mild mental retardation: Population, programs, and perspectives. Exceptional Children, 50, 149–159.
39.
PotterA., KaneJ. K., MartinJ., WoodG. B., & CleavelandC. D. (1976). Education of idiots: An appeal to the citizens of Philadelphia. In RosenM., ClackG. R., & KivitzM. S. (Eds.), The history of mental retardation: Collected papers, Vol-ume 1. Baltimore: University Park Press.
40.
SarassonS. B., & DorisJ. (1979). Educational handicap, public policy, and social history. New York: The Free Press.
41.
SkrticT. M. (1991). The special education para-dox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148–206.
42.
SumR. M., HarringtonP. E., & GoedickeW. (1987). One-fifth of the nation's teenagers: Em-ployment problems of poor youth in America, 1981-1985. Youth and Society, 18, 195–237.
43.
TuckerJ. (1980). Ethnic proportions in classes for the learning disabled: Issues in nonbiased assess-ment. Journal of Special Education, 14, 93–105.
44.
WallaceG. A. (1917). The types of feeble-minded who are cared for in the community. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 21, 88–93.
