Changing beliefs and perceptions through contact has been a recognized process for some time. However, few studies in the area of integration of people with mental retardation have examined underlying assumptions of contact situations. Existing stereotypes and prejudices concerning people with mental retardation were described within a psychosocial model of mental retardation. A conceptual review of contact between volun-teers and people with mental retardation at a Special Olympics' state games was undertaken within the five components of contact theory. This conceptual review indicated that instances of negative effect may limit extent of change expected in the perceptions volunteers hold of people with mental retardation. Results of a questionnaire study appeared to offer some support for such an interpretation. It was found, however, that contact, as compared to no contact, did contribute to positive changes in perceptions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
ArcherJ. (1985). Social deviance. In LindzeyGardner & AronsonElliot (Eds.), Vol II: The Handbook of Social Psychology. N.Y.: Random House.
3.
BartonL. (1986). The politics of special educational needs. Disability, Handicap, and Society, 1, 273–290.
4.
BartonL., & TomlinsonS. (Eds.). (1981). Special education: Policy, practices & social issues. London: Harper & Row Pub.
5.
BiklenD. (1988). The myth of clinical judgement. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), 127–140.
6.
BrickeyM. (1984). Normalizing the Special Olympics. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 55(8), 28–29, 75–76.
7.
CanabalM. Y. (1988). Volunteerism... Humanity at its best. Palaestra, 4(3), 10–11, 27.
8.
CookS. (1969). Motives in conceptual analysis of attitude related behaviors. In ArnoldW. J. & LevineI. (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 18 (pp. 179–231). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9.
DamicoS., & SparksC. (1986). Cross-group contact opportunities: Impact on interpersonal relationships in desegregated middle schools. Sociology of Education, 59, 113–123.
10.
EdgertonR. B. (1967). The cloak of competence: Stigma in the lives of the retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Fishbein, & AjzenI. (1978). Belief, attitude, intention: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
12.
JohnsonD. W., JohnsonR., & MaruyamaG. (1984). Goal interdependence and personal attraction. In MillerNormal & BrewerMargaret (Eds.), Groups in contact (pp. 187–212). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13.
HuettigC. I. (1983). Motives of Special Olympics volunteers. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas Women's University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 105A.
14.
MillerN., & BrewerM. B. (1984). The social psychology of desegregation: An introduction. In MillerNorman & BrewerMargaret B. (Eds.), Groups in contact. (pp. 1–10). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15.
MercerJ. R. (1968). Labelling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
OreloveF. P., WehmanP., & WoodJ. (1982). An evaluative review of special olympics: Implications for community integration. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17, 325–329.
17.
PealerJ., FittingW., GingasC., KinneyL., MaineA., RossJ., StaplesJ., & YatesJ. (1984). Program analysis of service systems (PASS): Massachusetts special olympics, 1984, summer games, Boston. Unpublished paper.
18.
PettigrewT. F. (1971). Racially separate or together. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, Pub. Co.
19.
PhillipsJ. L., & BalthazarE. E. (1980). Measuring attitude toward mentally retarded persons: The social perspectives scale. Madison, WI: Central Wisconsin Center for the Developmentally Disabled. (ED 191.235).
20.
PollowayE. A., & SmithJ. D. (1978). Special Olympics: A second look. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 13, 432–433.
21.
Ragtime. (1987). Disturbing questions concerning Special Olympics. The Disability Rag, Sept/Oct, 32.
22.
RiceT., & FlackL. (1988). Moving into the 90s with TASH and the Special Olympics. Newsletter, TASH, 14(9), 1–2.
23.
RothbartM., & JohnO. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 81–103.
24.
SachsM. L., & BerkleyT. R. (n.d.). Perspectives on Special Olympics: Humanism and sport psychology. Unpublished paper.
25.
SarasonS. B., & DorisJ. (1979). Educational handicap, public policy and social history. N.Y.: The Free Press, Collier.
26.
SchreenbergerA. (1983). The history of mental retardation. Baltimore, MD: P. Brookes, Pub.
27.
SherrillC. (1986). Adapted physical education and recreation: A multidisciplinary approach (3rd Ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
28.
SmithJ. D. (1985). Minds made feeble: The myth and legacy of the kallikaks. Rockville, MD: Aspen System Corporation.
29.
SongsterT. (1986). The special olympics sport program: An international sport program for mentally retarded athletes. In SherrillC. (Ed.), Sport and disabled athletes: The 1984 Olympic Scientific Congress Proceedings, 9 (pp. 73–80). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
30.
Special Olympics, Inc. (1985). Official Special Olympics sport rules. Washington, D.C.: Author.
31.
Special Olympics, Inc. (1988). Philosophy of Special Olympics. Palaestra, 1, 50.
32.
St. ClaireL. (1986). Mental retardation: Impairment or handicap?Disability, Handicap and Society, 1, 233–243.
33.
StephanW. G. (1984). Ignorance and personal attraction. In MillerNormal & BrewerMargaret (Eds.), Groups in contact (pp. 187–212). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
34.
StephanW. G., & BrighamJ. C. (1985). Intergroup contact: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 1–8.
35.
StephanW. G., & StephanC. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175.
36.
StevensJ. (1984). Sports opportunities for athletes with disabilities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 55(2), 34–36.
37.
WilderD. A., & ThompsonJ. E. (1980). Intergroup contact with independent manipulations of in-group and out-group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 589–603.
