The use of excessive verbal perseverations pertaining to a particular topic of interest is manifested in a subgroup of persons who are mentally retarded. This type of verbal behavior has traditionally been perceived as undesirable and inappropriate. The purpose of this study was to assess whether verbal perseverations are used communicatively, and if so, with what types of communicative intent they are used. Of the 6,497 observed utterances by 12 speakers who are mentally retarded, 16% were verbal perseverations. The majority of all utterances were used communicatively. Furthermore, verbal perseverations were more likely to be used primarily to maintain social interactions than were utterances that were not verbal perseverations. Educational and research implications were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BryenD. N., & JoyceD. G. (1985). Language intervention with the severely handicapped: A decade of research. The Journal of Special Education, 19(1), 7–39.
2.
EdmondsP. E., & HaynesW. O. (1988). Topic manipulation and conversational participation as a function of familiarity in school-age language-impaired and normal language peers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 209–228.
3.
GreenJ. A. (1988). Loglinear analysis of cross-classified ordinal data: Applications in develop-mental research. Child Development, 59, 1–25.
4.
HallidayM. (1975). Learning how to mean. In LennebergE. and LennebergE. (Eds.), Foundations of language development: A multi-disciplinary ap-proach (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
5.
HurtigR., EnsrudS., & TomblinJ. B. (1982). The communicative function of question pro-duction in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 12(1), 57–69.
6.
KannerL. (1954). Discussion. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 24, 764–766.
7.
KannerL. (1971). Follow-up study of eleven au-tistic children originally reported in 1943. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1(2), 119–145.
8.
KrupskiA. (1979). Are retarded children more distractible? Observational analysis of retarded and nonretarded children's classroom behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84(1), 1–10.
9.
LevineA. J. (1977). Naturalistic observation: Va-lidity of frequency data. Psychological Reports, 40, 1311–1338.
10.
LordC., & O'NeillP. J. (1983). Language and communication needs of adolescents with au-tism. In SchoplerE. and MesibovG. B. (Eds.), Autism in adolescents and adults. New York: Plenum Press, 57–77.
11.
LucasE. (1980). Semantic and pragmatic language disorders: Assessment and remediation. Rockville, Maryland: Aspen Systems.
12.
MacKayD. M. (1972). Formal analysis of com-municative processes. In HindeR. A. (Ed.), Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
13.
MesibovG. B., & SheaV. (March, 1980). Social and interpersonal problems of autistic adolescents and adults. Paper presented at the meeting of South-eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
14.
OxmanJ., & BlakeJ. (September, 1980). Sign language use by autistic children: A pragmatic analy-sis. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
15.
PrizantB. M., & DuchanJ. F. (1981). The func-tions of immediate echolalia in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 241–249.
16.
PrizantB. M., & RydellP. (1984). Analysis of functions of delayed echolalia in autistic chil-dren. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27(2), 183–192.
17.
PruttingC. A., & KirchnerD. M. (1987). A clini-cal appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of lan-guage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.
18.
ReinR. P. (1987). Observational study of the use of verbal perseverations by persons with autism. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts Interna-tional, 48, 7, 1736–A.
19.
RobinsonJ. F., & VitaleL. J. (1954). Children with circumscribed interest patterns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 24, 755–766.
20.
RuschF. R., WeithersJ. A., MenchettiB. M., & SchutzR. P. (1980). Social validation of a pro-gram to reduce topic repetition in a nonshel-tered setting. Education & Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15, 208–215.
21.
SabsayS., & PlattM. (1985). Weaving the cloak of competence. Working Paper No. 32. Socio-Behavioral Group, Mental Retardation Re-search Center, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
22.
SiroisP., & DorvalB. (1988). The role of returns to a prior topic in the negotiation of topic change: A developmental investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17(3), 185–209.
23.
VillaumeW. A., & CegalaD. J. (1988). Interac-tion involvement and discourse strategies: The patterned use of cohesive devices in conversa-tion. Communication Mongraphs, 55, 22–40.
24.
WetherbyA. M., & PruttingC. A. (1984). Pro-files of communicative and cognitive-social abili-ties in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 364–377.
25.
WingL. (1983). Social and interpersonal needs. In SchoplerE. and MesibovG. B. (Eds.), Autism in adolescents and adults. New York: Plenum Press, 337–353.
26.
WolffS., & BarlowA. (1980). Schizoid personal-ity in childhood: A comparative study of schiz-oid, autistic and normal children. In ChessS. and ThomasA. (Eds.), Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
27.
WrightH. F. (1967). Recording and analyzing child behavior. New York: Harper and Row.
