BalowI. H., MacMillanD. L., & HendrickI. G. (1987). Local option competency testing: Psychometric issues with mildly handicapped and educationally marginal students. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 32–37.
2.
BartlettR. H. (1979). Mental retardation—Where does the future lie?Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 14, 3–4.
3.
BradyP. M., ManniJ. L., & WinikurD. W. (1983). Implications of ethnic disproportion in programs for the educable mentally retarded. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 295–302.
4.
California State Department of Education, Office of Program Evaluation and Research. (1983). A Manual for determination of a severe discrepancy. Sacramento: State Department of Education.
5.
CarlbergC., & KavaleK. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A metaanalysis. Journal of Special Education, 14, 294–309.
6.
Committee on Policy Research (August23, 1985). The dropout problem in California. Sacramento.
7.
DunnL. M. (1974). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable? In JonesR. L. & MacMillanD. L. (Eds.), Special education in transition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (pp. 5–20).
8.
EdgertonR. B. (1967). The cloak of competence: Stigma in the lives of the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
EllisN. R. (Ed.) (1979). The handbook of mental deficiency (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
10.
FinnJ. D. (1982). Patterns in special education placement as revealed by OCR surveys. In HellerK. A., HoltzmanW. H., & MessickS. (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (pp. 322–381).
11.
FisherT. H. (1978). Florida's approach to competency testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 599–602.
12.
FlynnT. M. (1984). IQ tests and placement. Integrated Education, 21, 124–126.
13.
FornessS. R. (1985). Effects of public policy at the state level: California's impact on MR, LD, and ED categories. Remedial and Special Education, 6(3), 36–43.
14.
FornessS. R., & KavaleK. A. (1984). Education of the mentally retarded: A note on policy. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 239–245.
15.
FrankenbergerW. (1984). A survey of state guidelines for identification of mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 22, 17–20.
16.
GlassG. V. (1978). Minimum competence and incompetence in Florida. Phi Delta Kappan, 59, 602–605.
17.
GoldsteinH., MossJ. W., & JordanL. J. (1965). The efficacy of special class placement on the development of mentally retarded children. Cooperative Research Project No. 619. U.S. Office of Education.
18.
GottliebJ. (1981). Mainstreaming: Fulfilling the promise?American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 115–126.
19.
GrossmanH. J. (Ed.), (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
20.
GrossmanH. J. (Ed.), Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
21.
GuskinS. L., & SpickerH. H. (1968). Educational research in mental retardation. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation, Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. (pp. 217–278).
22.
HaneyW., & MadausG. (1978). Making sense of the competency testing movement. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 462–484.
23.
HaywoodH. C. (1979). Editorial: What happened to mild and moderate mental retardation?American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 429–431.
24.
HeberR. F. (1961). A manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation (Rev. ed.). American Journal of Mental Deficiency Monograph (Supp. 64). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
25.
HellerK. A., HoltzmanW. H., & MessickS. (Eds.), (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
26.
LambertN. M. (1981). Psychological evidence in Larry P. v. Wilson Riles: An evaluation by a witness for the defense. American Psychologist, 36, 937–952.
27.
MacMillanD. L. (1982). Mental retardation in school and society (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
28.
MacMillanD. L. (in press). “New” EMRs. In RobinsonG. & PollowayE. (Eds.), Best practices in mental disabilities, Vol. II. Des Moines, Iowa: State Department of Education.
29.
MacMillanD. L., BalowI. H., & WidamanK. F. (in press). Local option competency testing: Conceptual issues in testing mildly handicapped and marginal students. Learning Disabilities Research.
30.
MacMillanD. L., & BorthwickS. (1980). The new educable mentally retarded population: Can they be mainstreamed?Mental Retardation, 18, 155–158.
31.
MacMillanD. L., HendrickI. G., & WatkinsA. V. (1988). Impact of Diana, Larry P., and P.L. 94-142 on minority students. Exceptional Children, 54, 24–30.
32.
MacMillanD. L., KeoghB. K., & JonesR. L. (1986). Special education for the mildly handicapped. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan. (pp. 686–724).
33.
MacMillanD. L., & MeyersC. E. (1984). Molecular research and molar learning. In BrooksP. H., SperberR., & McCauleyC. (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. (pp. 473–492).
34.
MacMillanD. L., MeyersC. E., & MorrisonG. M. (1980). System-identification of mildly mentally retarded children: Implications for interpreting and conducting research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 108–115.
35.
MacMillanD. L., JonesR. L., & AloiaG. F. (1974). The mentally retarded label: A theoretical analysis and review of research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 241–261.
36.
MaddenN. A., & SlavinR. E. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53, 519–569.
37.
MercerJ. R. (1973). Labelling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
PatrickJ. I., & ReschlyD. J. (1982). Relationship of state educational criteria and demographic variables to school-system prevalence of mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 351–360.
39.
PollowayE. A., & SmithJ. D. (in press). Current status of the mild mental retardation construct: Identification, placement, and programs. In WangM. C., ReynoldsM. C., & WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
40.
PollowayE. A., & EpsteinM. H. (1985). Current research issues in mild mental retardation: A survey of the field. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 171–174.
41.
PollowayE. A., EpsteinM. H., & CullinanD. (1985). Prevalence of behavior problems among educable mentally retarded students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 3–13.
42.
PollowayE. A., EpsteinM. H., PattonJ. R., CullinanD., & LuebkeJ. (1986). Demographic, social, and behavioral characteristics of students with educable mental retardation. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 27–34.
43.
PollowayE. A., & SmithJ. D. (1983). Changes in mild mental retardation: Population, programs, and perspectives. Exceptional Children, 50, 149–159.
44.
PullinD. (1982). Minimum competency testing, the denied diploma and the pursuit of educational opportunity and educational adequacy. Report. Grant NIE CSE-R-180. Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA.
45.
RameyC. T., & MacPheeD. (1986). Developmental retardation: A systems theory perspective on risk and preventive intervention. (pp. 61–81). In FarranD. C. & McKinneyJ. D. (Eds.), Risk in intellectual and psychosocial development. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.
46.
ReschlyD. (1985, August). Myths and realities in minority special education overrepresentation. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Los Angeles.
47.
ReschlyD. J., & JipsonF. J. (1976). Ethnicity, geographic locale, age, sex, and urban-rural residence as variables in the prevalence of mild retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 154–161.
48.
RutterM., TizardJ., & WhitmoreK. (1970). Education, health and behavior. London: Longman.
49.
SemmelM. I., GottliebJ., & RobinsonN. M. (1979). Mainstreaming: Perspectives on educating handicapped children in the public schools. Review of Research in Education, 7, 223–279.
50.
SerowR. C. (1984). Effects of minimum competency testing for minority students: A review of expectations and outcomes. The Urban Review, 16(2), 67–75.
51.
SingerH., BalowI. H., & FerrettR. T. (1988). English classes as preparation for minimal competency tests in reading. Journal of Reading, 31, 512–519.
52.
SingerJ. D., & ButlerJ. A. (1987). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Schools as agents of social regard. Harvard Educational Review, 57(2), 125–152.
53.
SmithG. R. (1984). Desegregation and assignment of children to classes for the mildly retarded and learning disabled. Integrated Education, 21, 208–211.
54.
SmithJ. D., & DexterB. L. (1980). The basics movement: What does it mean for the education of mentally retarded students?Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15, 72–79.
55.
SmithJ. E., PollowayE. A., & SmithJ. D. (1978). The continuing dilemma of the mildly handicapped. Special Children, 4(2), 52–63.
56.
SpitzH. H. (1986). The raising of intelligence: A selected history of attempts to raise retarded intelligence. Hillsdale, N.J.: Laurence Erlbaum.
57.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983, April). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
58.
WernerE. E., & SmithR. S. (1982). Vulnerable, but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
WilsonR. S. (1983). The Louisville twin study: Developmental synchronies of behavior. Child Development, 54, 298–316.