Abstract
Aim:
Uterine conization involves the removal of cone-shaped tissue samples from the cervix to diagnose or treat precancerous or cancerous lesions. This study compared the surgical instruments used for conization: the YAG laser (used until October 2019) and a radiofrequency surgical device (endoCUT from VIO3®, used since November 2019). We aimed to assess whether a change in instrumentation would improve surgical outcomes.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed data from 545 first conizations performed between November 2016 and October 2022. Two cases of instrument failure and 11 cases of concurrent procedures were excluded.
Results:
The YAG laser group (YAG, n = 266) had a median operative time of 22 minutes and a median blood loss of 5 mL, with a mean blood loss of 18.20 mL. The radiofrequency group (VIO3, n = 260) demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time (14 minutes, p < 0.05) and lower blood loss (median of 5 mL, mean of 10.29 mL, p = 0.0269) as determined by the Mann–Whitney U test. However, the incidence of cervical canal stenosis was significantly higher in the VIO3 group than in the YAG laser group (2.7% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.036).
Conclusion:
In conization, switching the instrumentation from the YAG laser to a radiofrequency surgical device (endoCUT from VIO3®) significantly reduced the operation time and blood loss but increased cervical canal stenosis. Further studies are required to determine whether radiofrequency surgical devices are useful for conization.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.