Few robust engineering approaches currently exist to assess flame spread performance of interior finish materials for a range of source fires, in support of compartment fire hazard analysis. As a step toward closing this gap, a simplified approach for assessing (a) the propensity for a material to support self-propagating flame spread and (b) the extent of flame spread for a range of source fire conditions has been developed. In addition, a general approach for integrating the output of the simplified flame spread analysis into a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model has been developed to predict the overall fire growth and spread hazard for a passenger rail vehicle compartment.
KangK. A smoke model and its application for smoke management in an underground mass transit station. Fire Safety J2007; 42: 218–231.
2.
MicleaPCChowWKShen-WenC. International tunnel fire-safety design practices. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada, 2007.
3.
Jae SeongRRyouHSParkWH. CFD simulation and assessment of life safety in a subway train fire. Tunnel Underground Space Technol2009; 24: 447–453.
4.
National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM). Recommended fire safety practices for rail transit materials selection. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Office of Safety and Security, 2008.
5.
Meacham BJ, Dembsey NA, Schebel K, et al. Rail vehicle fire hazard guidance, Final Report, Developed under DHS Grant 2009-ST-108-000013, Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate, International Cooperative Programs Office, Washington, DC, July 2010.
6.
ASTM E-1354. Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products using and oxygen consumption calorimeter. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. vol. 07.07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1997.
7.
McGrattanKKleinBFloydJ. Fire dynamics simulator (version 5) – user’s guide. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2008.
8.
CapoteJAAlvearDLazaroM. Heat release rate and computer fire modelling vs real-scale fire tests in passenger trains. Fire Mater2008; 32: 213–229.
9.
ClearyTQuintiereJ. A framework for utilizing fire property tests. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1991.
10.
Cleary T and Quintiere J. A framework for utilizing fire property tests. In: Fire Safety Science - Proceedings of the Third International Symposium,1991, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 647–656. London: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
11.
Meacham BJ, Dembsey NA, Tubbs J, et al. A simplified approach for assessing initial fire development and spread in passenger rail vehicles. Transport Res Rec 2011; 2261: 57–63.
12.
Meacham, B.J., Dembsey, N.A., Johann, M., et al. Use of small-scale test data to enhance fire-related threat, vulnerability, consequence and risk assessment for passenger rail vehicles. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manage 2012; 9: 1–16.
13.
TewarsonA. Generation of heat and gaseous, liquid, and solid products in fires. In: DiNennoPJ (ed.) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineers. Quincy, MA: NFPA International, 2008, pp. 3:109–3:194.
14.
QuintiereJG. A theoretical basis for flammability properties. Fire Mater2005; 30: 175–214.
15.
Dembsey NA and Williamson RB. Coupling the fire behavior of contents and interior finishes for performance fire codes: evaluation of a fire spread model. J Fire Protec Eng1997; 8: 119–131.
16.
AvilaMB. The effect of resin type and glass content on the fire engineering properties of typical FRP composites. Worcester, MA: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2007.
17.
Mowrer FW and Williamson RB. Flame spread evaluation for thin interior finish materials. In: Fire safety science - proceedings of the third international symposium, 1991, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 689–698. London: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.
18.
QuintiereJ. A simulation model for fire growth on materials subject to a room-corner test. Fire Safety J1993; 20: 313–339.
19.
Kim E. Dembsey N.and Lautenberger C. Parameter estimation for pyrolysis modeling applied to polyester FRP composites with different glass contents. “Fire and Materials 2009, 11th International Conference and Exhibition” 2009, San Francisco, CA, pp. 61–76.
20.
Lautenberger C, Wong W, Coles A, et al. Large-scale turbulent flame spread modeling with FDS5 on charring and noncharring materials. “Fire and Materials 2009, 11th International Conference and Exhibition” 2009, San Francisco, CA, pp. 367–378.
21.
QuintiereJHarkleroadMHasemiY. Wall Flames and Implications for Upward Flame Spread. Combust Sci Technol1986; 48: 191–222.
22.
Saito K, Quintiere J, and Williams F. Upward turbulent flame spread. Fire Safety Science - Proceedings of the First International Symposium, 1986, Gaithersburg, MD, pp. 75–86. London: International Association for Fire Safety Science.
23.
BeaulieuPDembseyN. Effect of oxygen on flame heat flux in horizontal and vertical orientations. Fire Safety J2008; 43: 410–428.
24.
Babrauskas V. Heat release rates. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 4th ed., section 3, chapter 1, pp. 1–59. Philip Di Nenno, et. al Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2008.
