A network model has been used to study The Station Nightclub fire evacuation. Total evacuation times and occupant utilization of doors are compared to results obtained from previous work conducted at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and subsequent modeling carried out elsewhere. Depending on the selection of the door flow and exit choice algorithms the network model is able to get outcomes similar to those published by researchers using various fine grid/continuous models. New information regarding the occupant behavior during the incident has recently been published and this is used here to further investigate the capability of the network model.
SpearpointMJ. Comparative verification exercises on a probabilistic network model for building evacuation. J Fire Sci2009; 27(5): 409–430.
2.
KoSYSpearpointMJTeoA. Trial evacuation of an industrial premises and evacuation model comparison. Fire Safety J2007; 42(2): 91–105.
3.
SpearpointMJXiangX. Calculating evacuation times from lecture theatre type rooms using a network model. In: Fire Safety Science- Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, London, 2011, pp. 599–612.
4.
FahyRProulxGFlynnJ. The Station Nightclub fire – An analysis of witness statements. In: Fire Safety Science - Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, London, 2011, pp. 197–209.
5.
Grosshandler W, Bryner N, Madrzykowski D, et al. Report of the technical investigation of The Station Nightclub fire. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology Report NIST NCSTAR 2, Vol. 1, 2005.
6.
Grosshandler W, Bryner N, Madrzykowski D, et al. Report of the technical investigation of The Station Nightclub fire: appendices. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology Report NIST NCSTAR 2, Vol. 2, 2005.
7.
GaleaERWangZVeeraswamyA. Coupled fire/evacuation analysis of the Station Nightclub fire. Fire Safety Sci2008; 9: 465–476.
8.
Pan X. Computational modeling of human and social behaviors for emergency egress analysis. CIFE Technical Report #165, Stanford University, June 2006.
9.
ChaturvediAMellemaAFilatyevS. In: Alexandrov (eds) DDDAS for fire and agent evacuation modeling of the Rhode Island Nightclub Fire. ICCS 2006, Part III, LNCS 3993.. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 433–439.
10.
Verification and validation, Pathfinder 2009.1.0417, Thunderhead Engineering.
11.
GwynneSMVRosenbaumER. Employing the hydraulic model in assessing emergency movement. In: DiNennoPJ (ed.) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 4th edn., Section 3, Chapter 13. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2008, pp. 3/373–3/396.
12.
ProulxG. Evacuation time. In: DiNennoPJ (ed.) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 4th edn., , Section 3, Chapter 12.. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2008, pp. 3/355–3/372.
SmithRA. Density, velocity and flow relationships for closely packed crowds. Safety Sci1995; 18(4): 321–327.
15.
LordJMeachamBMooreA. Guide for evaluating the predictive capabilities of computer egress models. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST GCR 06-886, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005, pp. 102–102.
