In many respects, historic buildings have long been under-served by the fire safety engineering community and have not received the level of consideration warranted structures of significance and distinction. This can in part be explained by the idiosyncratic nature of these buildings that defy standard code and construction approaches given their archaic configurations and materials. This paper reviews current activity to address these issues including a comprehensive reviewof fire safety codes in the U.S. This reviewidentified many disparate approaches to regulating fire safety in historic buildings. There are different administrative and technical components and different administrative and technical approaches. The 2001 edition of NFPA 914, Code for Fire Protection in Historic Structures, focuses on performance-based evaluation as an important alternative to prescriptive codes. Goals, objectives, and performance criteria are essential elements of the new code. This paper is adapted from a presentation at the Third International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods [1].
Watts, John M., Jr
, “Performance-Based Fire Safety Codes for Heritage Buildings,”Proceedings: Third International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, 2000.
2.
ISO/DTR 13387-1, Fire Safety Engineering—Part 1: The Application of Fire Performance Concepts to Design Objectives, International Organization for Standardization, ISO Technical Committee/Subcommittee: TC 92/SC 4, 1998.
“Windsor—The Great Fire,”Pitkin Pictorials, Andover, Hants, UK, 1992.
5.
Bailey
, Sir Alan, Insall, Donald and Kilshaw, Philip, “Fire Protection Measures for Royal Palaces,”Department of National Heritage, London, 1993.
6.
Kippes, Wolfgang
and Holmberg, Jan, “The Risk Assessment in European Historic Buildings Project,”Fire Protection and the Built Heritage: Conference Abstracts, Technical Conservation Research and Education Division, Historic Scotland, Edinburgh, 1998, pp. 19–20.
7.
Society of Fire Protection Engineers, SFPE Today, November-December 1999, p. 4-4.
8.
Malholtra, H.L.
and Papaioannou, Kyriakos, “Framework for a CIB Guide on Fire Safety for Historic Buildings,”Fire Science and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2, 1991, pp. 69–72.
9.
Maxwell, I., Ross, N. and Dakin, A., Eds., Fire Protection and the Built Heritage: Conference Abstracts, Technical Conservation Research and Education Division, Historic Scotland, Edinburgh, 1998.
10.
Fangrat, Jadwiga
, Proceedings, Third International Symposium on Fire Protection of Heritage, 6–9October 1999, Poland.
11.
Papaioannou, Kyriakos
, Proceedings, International Conference on Fire Protection of Cultural Heritage, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1–2June 2000.
12.
Rezeznik, Michael J.
, “Fire Protection Design for the Star Spangled Banner,”Fire Protection Engineering, Premier Issue (1998), pp. 11–14, 16.
13.
Watts, John M., Jr.“Rehabilitating Existing Buildings,”Fire Protection Engineering, Issue No. 2, Spring 1999, pp. 6–8, 10, 12, 14, 15.
14.
Bowman, Andrew
, Performance-Based Analysis of An Historic Museum”Fire Protection Engineering, Issue No. 8, Fall 1999, pp. 36–38, 41–43.
15.
Caldwell, Carol
and MacLennan, Hammish, “Guidelines for Fire Safety,” No. 7, New Zealand Historic Places Trust, Wellington, 2000.
16.
Watts, John M., Jr.
and Kaplan, Marilyn E., “Performance-Based Approach to Protecting Our Heritage,”Proceedings: International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, 1997, pp. 339–347.
17.
“Burra Charter,”International Center for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 1992.
18.
“Charter of Venice: International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites,”Second International Congress of the Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, Italy, 1964.
19.
“The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings,”National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 1993.
20.
Watts, John M., Jr.
and Kaplan, Marilyn E., “Draft Code for Historic Buildings,”Association for Preservation Technology International, Williamsburg, VA, October 2000.
21.
Watts, John M., Jr.
, “Fire Risk Indexing,” Section 5, Chapter 10, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, National Fire Protection Association, 3rd ed., Quincy, MA, 2001.
22.
Watts, John M., Jr.
, “Fire Risk Assessment Using Multiattribute Evaluation,” Fire Safety Science, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium, International Association of Fire Safety Science, 1997, pp. 679–690.
23.
Watts, John M., Jr.
and Kaplan, Marilyn E., “Fire Risk Index for Historic Buildings,”Fire Tech-nology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2001.
24.
SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection Analysis and Design, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1999.
25.
Fire Engineering Guidelines, Fire Code Reform Centre, Ltd., Sydney, Australia, 1996.
26.
Fire Safety Engineering in Buildings, DD240: Part 1, British Standards Institution, London, 1997.
27.
Proceedings: 1996 International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, 1997.
28.
Proceedings: Second International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, 1998.
29.
Proceedings: Third International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, 2000.
30.
NFPA 914, Code for Fire Protection in Historic Structures, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2001.
31.
Watts, John M., Jr.
, and Solomon, Robert E., “Code for Fire Protection in Historic Structures—” NFPA 914 2001, Proceedings, International Conference on Fire Protection of Cultural Heritage, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1–2June 2000.
32.
NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000 Edition, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2000.
33.
Watts, John M., Jr.
, “Performance-Based Life Safety Code,”Proceedings, 1996 International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, 1997, pp. 159–169.
34.
Watts, John M., Jr.
, “Y2K Performance-Based Life Safety Code,”Proceedings, Third International Conference on Fire Research and Engineering, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, 1999, pp. 146–151.
35.
Lippiatt, Barbara C.
and Weber, Stephen F., “HIST 1.0: Decision Support Software for Rating Buildings by Historic Significance,” NISTIR 5683, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, October 1995.
36.
Marchant, Eric W.
, “Preventing Fire in Historic Buildings: The Acceptable Risk,”Fire Technology, Vol. 25, No. 2, May 1989, pp. 165–176.
37.
Guideline on Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, February 2000.
38.
SFPE Engineering Guide to Design Performance Criteria, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, 2001.
