The potential role of entrepreneurship in public sector organizations is explored. Entrepreneurship is conceptualized as a manageable process with underlying dimensions of innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness. Unique characteristics of the public sector environment are examined, and a number of core principles and concepts from entrepreneurship are applied. Arguments against the application of these concepts are addressed. Results are reported of a survey of 152 public sector managers in South Africa. The findings suggest that these managers find entrepreneurship to be a salient concept for their organizations, and that the key obstacles to its implementation are very similar to those reported by corporate managers. Implications are drawn for theory and practice, and a number of suggestions are made for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamH., & MoodleyK. (1986) South Africa without Apartheid: Dismantling racial domination.Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
AnsoffI. H. (1979) Strategic Management.New York: Macmillan.
3.
BehnR. D. (1991) Leadership counts: Lessons for public managers from the Massachusetts Welfare, Training, and Employment Program.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BelloneC. J., & GoerlG. F. (1992) Reconciling public entrepreneurship and democracy. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 130–134.
BowerJ. L. (1977) Effective public management. Harvard Business Review, March/April, 135.
7.
BrandtS. C. (1986) Entrepreneuring in established companies.Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones-Irwin.
8.
BurgelmanR. A. (1983) A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8(January), 32–47.
9.
BurnsT., & StalkerG. (1961) The management of innovation.London: Tavistock.
10.
CarrollJ. D. (1996) Reinventing public administration. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 245–246.
11.
CollinsO. F., & MooreD. G. (1964) The enterprising man.East Lansing: Michigan State University.
12.
CooperT. L., & WrightN. D. Eds., (1992) Exemplary public administrators: Character and leadership in government.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
CornwallJ. R., & PerlmanB. (1990) Organizational entrepreneurship.Homewood, IL: Irwin.
14.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD. P. (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.
15.
DaviesS., & GriffithsD. (1995) Kirklees metropolitan council: Corporate strategy in a local authority. In Clarke-HillC., & GlaistarK. (Eds.), Cases in strategic management, 2nd edition, pp. 150–176. London: Pitman Publishing.
16.
DavisD., MorrisM., & AllenJ. (1991) Perceived environmental turbulence and its effect on selected entrepreneurship, marketing, and organizational characteristics in industrial firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(Spring), 43–51.
17.
DoigJ. W., & HargroveE. C. Eds. (1987) Leadership and innovation: Entrepreneurs in government.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
DruckerP. F. (1995) Really reinventing government. The Atlantic Monthly, February, 49–61.
19.
Etzioni-HalevyE. (1983) Bureaucracy and democracy: A political dilemma.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20.
EmeryF. E., & TristE. (1965) The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.
21.
FoxC. J. (1996) Reinventing government as postmodern symbolic politics. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 256–262.
22.
FredericksonH. G. (1996) Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 263–270.
23.
GartnerW. B. (1985) A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.
24.
HaleS. J., & WilliamsM. M. Eds. (1989) Managing change: A guide to producing innovation form within.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
25.
Harvard Business Review (1995) How can big companies keep the entrepreneurial spirit alive?73, November-December, 183–192.
26.
HebertR. F., & LinkA. N. (1988) The entrepreneur (2nd ed.). New York: Praeger.
27.
JenningsD. F., & SeamanS. L. (1990) Aggressiveness of response to new business opportunities following deregulation: An empirical study of established financial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(October), 177–89.
28.
JordanF. (1990) Innovating America.New York: The Ford Foundation.
29.
KanterR. M. (1983) The change masters: Innovative and productivity in the American corporation.New York: Simon & Schuster.
30.
KaoJ. J. (1989) Entrepreneurship, creativity, and organization.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
KamenskyJ. M. (1996) Role of the “reinventing government” movement in federal management reform. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 247–255.
32.
KettlD. F. (1995) Building lasting reform: Enduring questions, missing reforms. In KettlD. F., & DiluiloJ. J.Jr. (Eds), Inside the machine: Appraising governmental reform, pp. 9–86. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
33.
KhademianA. M. (1995) Reinventing a government corporation: Professional priorities and a clear bottom line. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 17–28.
34.
LawrenceP., & LorschJ. (1967) Organization and environment.Boston: Harvard University, Division of Research.
35.
LewisE. (1980) Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic power.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
36.
LindenR. (1990) From vision to reality: Strategies of successful innovators in government.Charlottesville, VA:
37.
LitanR., & NordhausW. (1983) Reforming federal regulation.New Haven: Yale University Press.
38.
MacMillanI. C., BlockZ., & NarasimhaP. N. S. (1986) Corporate venturing: Alternatives, obstacles encountered, and experience effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(2), 121–132.
39.
MillerD. (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(July), 770–791.
40.
MillerD., & FriesenP. H. (1983) Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1–25.
MitchellT., & ScottW. G. (1987) Leadership failures, the distrusting public, and prospects of the administrative state. Public Administrative Review, 47(2), 445–452.
43.
MoeR. C. (1994) Thickening government: Federal hierarchy and the diffusion of accountability.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
44.
MokwaM., & PermutS. (1981) Government marketing.New York: Praeger.
45.
Moody's Public Finance. (1994) The implications of reinventing government. Perspectives on Municipal Issues, April, 1–7.
46.
MooreB. H., Ed. (1983) The entrepreneur in local government.Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
47.
MooreJ. (1992) British privatization—Taking capitalism to the people. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 115–124.
48.
MorrisM. H., & CalantoneR. (1991) Redefining the purchasing function: An entrepreneurial perspective. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 27(4), 2–9.
49.
MorrisM. H., & SextonD. (1996) The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: Implications for company performance. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 5–14.
50.
MorrisM. H., SextonD., & LewisP. (1995) Reconceptualizing entrepreneurship: An input-output perspective. SAM Advanced Management Journal.
51.
MurrayM. A. (1975) Comparing public and private management: An exploratory essay. Public Administration Review, July/August, 366–367.
52.
NuttP. C., & BackoffR. W. (1993) Transforming public organizations with strategic management and strategic leadership. Journal of Management, 19(2), 299–349.
53.
OsborneD., & GaeblerT. A. (1992) Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54.
PerlmutterF. D., & CnaanR. A. (1995) Entrepreneurship in the public sector: The horns of a dilemma. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 29–36.
55.
PetersT. J. (1987) Thriving on chaos.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
56.
PinchotG. (1985) IntrapreneuringNew York: Harper and Row.
57.
RaineyH. G., BackoffR. W., & LevineC. H. (1976) Is management really generic. Public Administration Review, March/April, 233–244.
58.
RamamurtiR. (1986) Public entrepreneurs: Who they are and how they operate. California Management Review, 28(3), 142–158.
59.
ReynoldsL. (1994) Can government be reinvented?Management Review, January, 14–21.
60.
SavasE. S. (1987) Privatization: The key to better government.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
61.
SavasE. S. (1992) Privatization in post-socialist countries. Public Administration Review, November-December, 573–581.
62.
SkoldbergK. (1994) Tales of change: Public administration reform and narrative mode. Organization Science, 5(2), 219–238.
63.
SteinJ. (1995) Building better bureaucrats. Regulation, 3, 24–33.
64.
StevensonH., & JarilloJ. (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.
65.
StevensonH. H., RobertsM. J., & GrousbeckH. I. (1989) Business ventures and the entrepreneur.Homewood, IL: Irwin.
66.
StewartA. (1989) Team entrepreneurship.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67.
SweeneyJ. C., & HydeA. C. (1995) The public manager 1995 annual survey. The Public Manager, Summer, 56–64.
68.
ThompsonV. A. (1965) Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(June), 1–20.
69.
TimmonsJ. A. (1990) New venture creation: Entrepreneurship in the 1990s.Homewood, IL: Irwin.
70.
TropmanJ. E., & MorningstarG. (1989) Entrepreneurial systems for the 1990s.Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
71.
WeidenbaumM. (1992) Return of the “R” word. Policy Review, Winter, 40–53.
72.
WilsonJ. Q. (1973) Political organizations.New York: Basic Books.
73.
ZahraS. A. (1986) A canonical analysis of corporate entrepreneurship antecedents and impact on performance. In Pearce, & Robinson (Eds.), Best Paper Proceedings, pp. 71–75, Academy of Management.
