Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) has become an important and extensively researched topic in the literature. Empirical results suggest that EO may influence firm performance. However, it is important to determine whether the EO-performance relationship is sustainable since EO can be a resource-consuming strategic orientation. This research examines the sustainability of the EO-performance relationship; i.e., whether EO affects performance during an extended period of time or is a “quick fix” where performance is only temporarily affected. Using data from Swedish small firms, the results indicate that there is indeed a positive relationship between EO and performance. This relationship also increases over time. The results show that investments in EO may be worthwhile for small firms since they pay off over an extended period of time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichH. (1979) Organizations and environments.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
BamfordC. E., DeanT.J., & McDougallP. P. (1997) Initial strategies and new venture growth: An examination of the effectiveness of broad vs. narrow breadth strategies. In ReynoldsP. D., BygraveW. D., CarterN. M., DavidssonP., GartnerW. D., MasonC. M., & McDougallP. P., Frontiers of entrepreneurship research.Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
3.
BarkhamR., GudginG., HartM., & HanveyE. (1996) The determinants of small firm growth (vol. 12). Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK: Athenaeum Press.
4.
BirleyS., & WestheadP. (1990) Growth and performance contrasts between “types” of small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 535–557.
5.
BrownT. (1996) Resource orientation, entrepreneurial orientation and growth: How the perception of resource availability affects small firm growth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
6.
BrownT. E., & DavidssonP. (1998) Entrepreneurial orientation versus entrepreneurial management: Relating Miller/Covin & Slevin's conceptualization of entrepreneurship to Stevenson's. Paper presented at the 1998 Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Gent, Belgium, May 21–23.
7.
BrushC. G., & VanderwerfP. A. (1992) A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2), 157–170.
8.
CameronK. (1978) Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 604–632.
9.
CastrogiovianniG. J. (1996) Pre-start-up planning and the survival of new small firms. Journal of Management, 22(6), 801–823.
10.
ChandlerG. N., & HanksS. H. (1993) Measuring performance of emerging businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 3–40.
11.
ChandlerG. N., & HanksS. H. (1994a) Founder competence, the environment, and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 77–89.
12.
ChandlerG. N., & HanksS. H. (1994b) Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 331–349.
13.
CohenJ. (1969) The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 95–121.
14.
CooperA. C. (1995) Challenges in predicting new venture performance. In BullI., ThomasH., & WillardG. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Perspectives on theory building.London: Elsevier Science Ltd.
15.
CooperA.C., & Gimeno-GasconF. J. (1992) Entrepreneurs, processes of founding and new firm performance. In SextonD., & KasardaJ. (Eds.), The state of the art in entrepreneurship.Boston, MA: PWS Publishing Co.
16.
CooperA. C., Gimeno-GasconF. J., & WooC. Y. (1994) Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371–395.
17.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD. P. (1986) The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale. In RonstadtR., HornadayJ. A., PetersonR., & VesperK. H., Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, pp. 628–639. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
18.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD. P. (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(January), 75–87.
19.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD. P. (1991) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.
20.
DessG. G., LumpkinG. T., & CovinJ. G. (1997) Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.
21.
FlamholtzE. G. (1986) Managing the transition from an entrepreneurship to a professionally managed firm.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
FombrunC. J., & WallyS. (1989) Structuring small firms for rapid growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 107–222.
23.
GartnerW. B. (1988) “Who is an entrepreneur” is the wrong question. American Small Business Journal, (Spring) 14, 11–31.
24.
HartS. L. (1992) An integrative framework for strategy-making processes. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 327–351.
25.
HoyF., McDougallP. P., & D'SouzaD. E. (1992) Strategies and environments of high growth firms. In SextonD. L., & KasardaJ. D. (Eds.), The state of the art of entrepreneurship, pp. 341–357. Boston: PWS-Kent.
26.
JunehedJ., & DavidssonP. (1998) Small firms and export success: Development and empirical test of an integrated model. Paper presented at the 10th Nordic Conference on Small Business Research, Växjö, Sweden, June 14–16.
27.
LumpkinG. T., & DessG. G. (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
28.
MillerD. (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
29.
MillerD. (1987) Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implication for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 7–32.
30.
MillerD., & FriesenP. H. (1978) Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24(9), 921–933.
31.
MillerD., & FriesenP. H. (1982) Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1–25.
32.
NamenJ. L., & SlevinD. P. (1993) Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 137–153.
33.
PorterM. E. (1985) Competitive advantage.New York: Free Press.
34.
SandbergW. R., & HoferC. W. (1987) Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 5–28.
35.
SextonD., & Bowman-UptonN. (1991) Entrepreneurship: Creativity and growth.New York: Macmillan.
36.
ShaperoA., & SokolL. (1982) The social dimension of entrepreneurship. In KentC. A., SextonD. L., & VesperK. H. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of entrepreneurship.Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
StoreyD. J. (1994) Understanding the small business sector.London: Routledge.
38.
TsaiW. M.-H., MacMillanI. C., & LowM. B. (1991) Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 9–28.
39.
WeinzimmerL. G., NystromP. C., & FreemanS. J. (1998) Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 24(2), 235–262.
40.
WiklundJ. (1998a) Entrepreneurial orientation as predictor of performance and entrepreneurial behavior in small firms—longitudinal evidence. In ReynoldsP. D., BygraveW. D., CarterN. M., MenigartS., MasonC. M., & McDougallP. P., Frontiers of entrepreneurship research.Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
41.
WiklundJ. (1998b) Small firm growth and performance: Entrepreneurship and beyond.Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.
42.
WiklundJ., DavidssonP., DelmarF., & AronssonM. (1997) Expected consequences of growth and their effect on growth willingness in different samples of small firms. In ReynoldsP. D., BygraveW. D., CarterN. M., DavidssonP., GartnerW. D., MasonC. M., & McDougallP. P., Frontiers of entrepreneurship research.Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
43.
ZahraS. (1991) Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An explorative study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259–285.
44.
ZahraS. (1993a) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour: A critique and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(4), 5–21.
45.
ZahraS. A. (1993b) Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 319–340.
46.
ZahraS., & CovinJ. (1995) Contextual influence on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58.
