The literature highlights the importance of corporate entrepreneurship (CE) for improving a company's market and financial performance. This paper extends the literature by focusing on the knowledge-creation processes within a firm's formal and informal CE activities. This multifaceted knowledge, which encompasses organizational, technical, and social dimensions, is developed by individuals or groups and diffused throughout the organization. Whether radical or incremental, this knowledge can generate new skills, which a company can then use to reconfigure the sources of its competitive advantage. This paper also discusses the role of intrapreneurs and CE champions, particularly in the creation and use of social capital, in the development of dynamic competencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsK. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy, second ed.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
2.
Baden-FullerC., & StopfordM. J. (1994). Rejuvenating the mature business, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
3.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
4.
BettisR. A., & HittM. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape.Strategic Management Journal, 16(special issue), 7–19.
5.
BognerW. C., ThomasH., & McGeeJ. (1998). Core competence and competitive advantage: A dynamic, theory-based model. Working Paper, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
6.
BohnR. E. (1994). Measuring and managing technological knowledge.Sloan Management Review, 36(1), 61–73.
7.
BrazealD. V. (1993). Organizing for internally developed corporate ventures.Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 75–90.
8.
BrownJ. S. (1991). Research that reinvents the corporation.Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 102–111.
9.
BurgelmanR. A. (1983a). A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy.Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 61–70.
10.
BurgelmanR. A. (1983b). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm.Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244.
11.
BurgelmanR. A. (1983c). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study.Management Science, 29(12), 1349–1364.
12.
BurgelmanR. A. (1991). Intraorganizational ecology of strategy-making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research.Organization Science, 2, 239–262.
13.
BurgelmanR. A., & SaylesL. R. (1986). Inside corporate innovation strategy, structure and managerial skills.New York: The Free Press.
14.
ClarkK. B., & FujimotoT. (1991). Product development performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
15.
CovinJ. G., & SlevinD. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.
16.
D'AveniR. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering.New York: The Free Press.
17.
DayG. S. (1994). Continuous learning about markets.California Management Review, 36(4), 9–31.
18.
DessG. G., LumpkinG. T., & CovinJ. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models.Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.
19.
DodgsonM. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures.Organization Studies, 14(3), 375–394.
DoughertyD., & HellerT. (1994). The illegitimacy of product innovation in large firms.Organization Science, 5(2), 200–218.
22.
FiolC. M. (1991). Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage.Journal of Management, 17, 191–211.
23.
FiolC. M. (1994). Consensus diversity, and learning in organizations.Organization Science, 5(3), 403–420.
24.
GrantR. M. (1995). Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications, second ed.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
25.
GrantR. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
26.
GrantR. M. (1997). The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice.Long-Range Planning, 30(3), 450–454.
27.
HamelG., & PrahaladC. K. (1989). Strategic intent.Harvard Business Review, 67(3), 63–76.
28.
HamelG., & PrahaladC. K. (1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage.Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75–84.
29.
HamelG., & PrahaladC. K. (1994). Competing for the future.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
30.
HamelG., & PrahaladC. K. (1996). Competing in the new economy: Managing out of bounds.Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 237–242.
31.
HedlundG. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation.Strategic Management Journal, 15(special issue), 73–90.
32.
HelfatC. E. (1994). Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D.Management Science, 20(12), 1720–1747.
HuberG. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures.Organization Science, 2, 88–115.
35.
ItamiH. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets.Boston: Harvard University Press.
36.
KanterR. (1985). Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies.Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 47–60.
37.
KanterR. (1989). When giants learn to dance.New York: Simon & Schuster.
38.
KimL. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39.
KodamaF. (1995). Emerging patterns of innovation: Sources of Japan's technological edge.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
40.
KogutB., & ZanderU. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinatory capabilities, and the replication of technology.Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
41.
KuratkoD., MontagnoR., & HornsbyJ. (1990). Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for effective corporate entrepreneurial environment.Strategic Management Journal, 11(Summer), 49–58.
42.
LeiD., HittM. A., & BettisR. (1996). Dynamic core competencies through meta-learning and strategic context.Journal of Management, 22(4), 549–569.
43.
LevinthalD. A., & MarchJ. G. (1993). The myopia of learning.Strategic Management Journal, 14(special issue), 95–112.
44.
LumpkinG. T., & DessG. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance.Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 135–172.
45.
MahoneyJ. T., & PandianJ. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management.Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.
46.
McGrathR. G., MacMillanI. C., & VenkataramanS. (1995). Defining and developing a competence: A strategic process paradigm.Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 251–275.
47.
MillerD. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms.Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
48.
NelsonR., & WinterS. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
NonakaI. (1991). The knowledge-creating company.Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.
50.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
51.
NonakaI., & TakeuchiH. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation.New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
PenroseR. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm.New York: John Wiley.
53.
PetersT. J., & WatermanR. H.Jr. (1982). In search of excellence.New York: Harper and Row.
PinchotG.III (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don't have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur.New York: Harper and Row.
56.
PisanoG. P. (1996). Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology.Research Policy, 25(7), 1097–1119.
57.
PrahaladC. K., & HamelG. (1990). The core competence of the corporation.Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79–91.
58.
RogersE. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, fourth ed.New York: Free Press.
59.
ScheinE. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning.Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 9–20.
60.
SchumpeterJ. (1934). The theory of economic development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
SpenderJ-C., & GrantR. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview.Strategic Management Journal, 17, 5–9.
62.
StarrJ. A., & MacMillanI. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures.Strategic Management Journal, 11, 79–92.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm.Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter), 27–43.
WeickK. E., & RobertsK. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks.Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381.
68.
WernerfeltB. (1995). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after.Strategic Management Journal, 16, 171–174.
69.
ZahraS. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory studyJournal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285.
70.
ZahraS. (1993a). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: A taxonomic approach.Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319–340.
71.
ZahraS. (1993b). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: A critique and extension.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 5–21.
72.
ZahraS. (1995). Corporate entrepreneurship and company performance: The case of management levcraged buyouts.Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3), 225–247.
73.
ZahraS. (1996). Governance, ownership and corporate entrepreneurship among the Fortune 500: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities.Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1713–1735.
74.
ZahraS. (1997). Research on the international dimensions of corporate entrepreneurship: Opportunities, challenges and rewards. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting (Joint Symposium sponsored by the Entrepreneurship and International Management Divisions), Boston.
75.
ZahraS., & BognerW. (1998). Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment.Journal of Business Venturing, in press.
76.
ZahraS., & ChaplesS. (1993). Blind spots in competitive analysis.Academy of Management Executive, 7(2), 7–28.
77.
ZahraS., & CovinJ. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.
78.
ZahraS., CovinS., & ZahraP. (1998). Organizational structure and corporate entrepreneurship: Implications for performance.Journal of Enterprising Culture, in press.
79.
ZahraS., & DasS. (1993a). Innovation strategy and financial performance in manufacturing companies: An empirical analysis.Production and Operations Management, 2(1), 15–37.
80.
ZahraS., & DasS. (1993b). Building competitive advantage on manufacturing resources.Long Range Planning, 26(2), 90–100.
81.
ZahraS., & GarvisS. (1999). International corporate entrepreneurship and company performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility.Journal of Business Venturing, in press.
82.
ZahraS., NashS., & BickfordD. (1995). Transforming technological pioneering into competitive advantage.Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 17–31.
83.
ZahraS., & PearceJ. (1994). Corporate entrepreneurship in smaller firms: The role of strategy, environment and organization.Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change, 3(1), 31–44.
84.
ZahraS., & NielsenA. (1998). Integration as a moderator of the relationship between sources manufacturing capabilities and technology commercialization.Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings.
