The present study develops a process model of succession involving steps undertaken to prepare the family business for succession. The model examined multiple spheres of influence, including individual, group (family), organizational, and critical resource providers, as well as investigating the moderating effects of generational differences. Tests of this model used responses from a nationwide survey of family business owner/managers. The results support research expectations that various factors, especially family influence, positively affect the extent of succession planning. Further evidence is provided indicating that generation moderates revealed relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApplegateJ. (1994). Keep your firm in the family.Money, 23, 88–91.
2.
ArnoldH. J. (1982). Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29(April), 143–174.
3.
AronoffC. E., & WardJ. L. (1991). You deserve the best managers.Nation's Business, February, 38–40.
4.
AstrachanJ. H. (1988). Family firm and community culture.Family Business Review, 1(2), 165–189.
5.
BarachJ. A. (1984). Is there a cure for the paralyzed family board?Sloan Management Review, 3–12.
6.
BeckerH. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment.American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–42.
7.
BeckerE. (1973). The denial of death.New York: Free Press.
8.
BeckhardR., & DyerW. G. (1983). Managing change in the family firm—Issues and strategies.Sloan Management Review, 24, 59–65.
9.
BeckhardR., & DyerW. G. (1983b). Managing continuity in the family-owned business.Organizational Dynamics, 5–12.
BlauP., & SchoenherrR. (1971). The structure of organizations.New York: Basic Books.
12.
BluedornA., JohnsonR., CartwrightD., & BarringerB. (1994). The interface and convergence of the strategic management and organizational environment domains.Journal of Management, 20(2), 201–262.
13.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
CarlssonG., & KarlssonK. (1970). Age, cohorts and the generation of generations.American Sociological Review, 35, 710–718.
15.
CarrollG. R., & TeoA. C. (1996). On the social networks of managers.Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 421–440.
16.
ChagantiR., ChagantiR., & MaloneS. (1991). High performance strategies for entrepreneurial companies: Research findings from over 500 firms.New York: Quorum Books.
17.
ChristensenC. R. (1953). Management succession in small and growing enterprises.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
ChurchillN. C., & LewisV. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth.Harvard Business Review, 61, 30–51.
19.
CyertR. M., & MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
DattaD. K., & GuthrieJ. P. (1994). Executive succession: Organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics.Strategic Management Journal, 15, 569–577.
21.
DavisJ. A. (1982). The influence of life stage on father-son work relationships in family companies. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School, cited in Dyer & Handler, 1994, Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections.Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 19(1), 71–83.
22.
DavisP., & SternD. (1980). Adaptation, survival, and growth of the family business: An integrated systems perspective.Human Relations, 34(4), 207–224.
23.
DavisS. M. (1968). Entrepreneurial succession.Administration Science Quarterly, 13, 403–416.
24.
DyerW. G.Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
DyerW. G.Jr. (1994). Potential contributions of organizational behavior to the study of family owned businesses.Family Business Review, 7(2), 109–131.
26.
FarquharK. A. (1989). Employee responses to external executive succession: Attributions and the emergence of leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, cited in W. Handler, 1994, Succession in family business: A review of the literature.Family Business Review, 7, 273–286.
27.
FischerE., ReuberW., & DykeL. (1993). A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender and entrepreneurship.Journal of Business Venturing, Winter, 151–168.
28.
GundryL. K., & WelschH. P. (1994). Differences in familial influence among women-owned businesses.Family Business Review, 7(3), 273–286.
29.
HambrickD. C. (1989). Putting top managers back in the strategy picture.Strategic Management Journal, 10, 5–15.
30.
HandlerW. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next-generation family member's experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Management, Boston University, cited in, W. Handler, 1994, Succession in family business: A review of the literature.Family Business Review, 7, 273–286.
31.
HandlerW. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between the entrepreneur and next-generation family members.Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 15(1), 37–51.
32.
HandlerW. (1992). The succession experience of the next generation.Family Business Review, 5(3), 283–307.
33.
HandlerW. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the literature.Family Business Review 7, 273–286.
34.
HarveyM., & EvansR. (1995). Life after succession in the family business: Is it really the end of problems?Family Business Review, 8(1), 3–16.
35.
HelmichD. (1977). Executive succession in the corporate organization: A current integration.Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 252–266.
36.
HelmichD., & BrownW. (1972). Successor type and organizational change in corporate enterprise.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 371–381.
37.
HollandP. G., & BoultonW. R. (1984). Balancing the “family” and the “business” in family business.Business Horizons, 27(2), 16–21.
38.
IversonR., & RoyP. (1994). A causal model of behavioral commitment: Evidence from a study of Australian blue-collar employees.Journal of Management, 20(1), 15–41.
39.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1977). The entrepreneurial personality: A person at the crossroads.The Journal of Management Studies, 34–57.
40.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of family-controlled firms.Organizational Dynamics, 21, 59–71.
41.
KimberlyJ. R., & EvaniskoM. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations.Academy of Management Journal, 689–713.
42.
LitzR. G. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity.Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings. 55th Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
43.
LongeneckerJ. G., & SchoenJ. E. (1978). Management succession in the family business.Journal of Small Business Management, 16, 1–16.
44.
LowM. B., & MacMillanI. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges.Journal of Management, 14(2), 139–161.
45.
MarinoK., & DollingerM. (1987). Top management succession in entrepreneurial firms: Cases from the computer industry.Journal of Management Case Studies, 3, 70–79.
46.
MillerD. (1991). Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment.Management Science, 37, 34–52.
47.
PerrowC. (1972). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. In BrinkerhoffM. B., and KuntzP. R. (Eds.), Complex organizations and their environments, pp. 48–67. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
48.
PhillipsL. W. (1981). Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing.Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 395–415.
49.
PfefferJ. (1983). Organizational demography. In CummingsL. L., and StallB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 5, pp. 299–357. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
50.
PozaE. J. (1989). Smart growth: Critical choices for business continuity and prosperity.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
PriceJ., & MuellerC. (1981). Professional turnover: The case of nurses.New York: SP Medical and Scientific.
52.
ReynoldsP. D. (1992). Sociology and entrepreneurship: Concepts and contributions.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 47–70.
53.
RobinsonR., & PearceJ. A.II (1983). The impact of formalized strategic planning on financial performance in small organizations.Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 197–207.
54.
RueL. W. (1973). Theoretical and operational implications of long-range planning on selected measures of financial performance in U.S. industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University.
55.
SengeP. (1992). The fifth discipline.New York: Doubleday.
56.
SeymourK. E. (1993). Intergenerational relationships in the family firm: The effect on leadership succession.Family Business Review, 6(3), 263–281.
57.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations, pp. 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally.
58.
VancilR. (1987). Passing the baton.Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
WardJ. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
WeberM. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization.New York: Oxford University Press.
