The Investment appraisal and valuation process of venture capitalists includes Information gathering, the assessment of risk and required return, and the choice of a valuation method. This process is empirically studied in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France. The Importance of different information sources is equal in the four countries, except that the French venture capitalists Place more emphasis on personal references and the track record of the entrepreneur. The required return is lowest in the Netherlands and Belgium for every development stage of a company, and highest in the UK. The most widely used valuation method in the UK is the multiplication of past or future earnings with some price-earnings ratio. In the Netherlands and Belgium it is the discounting of future cash flows, and in France it is the book value of the net worth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmitR., GlostenL., & MullerE. (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research.Journal of Management Studies, 30(5), 815–34.
2.
ArnoldJ., & MoizerP. (1984). A survey of the methods used by UK investment analysts to appraise investments in ordinary shares.Accounting and Business Research, Summer, 195–207.
DixitA. K., & PindyckR. S. (1995). The options approach to capital investment.Harvard Business Review, May-June, 105–115.
11.
European Venture Capital Associaton (1995). EVCA Yearbook 1995.Zaventem: EVCA.
12.
European Venture Capital Associaton (1996). EVCA Yearbook 1996.Zaventem: EVCA.
13.
FranksJ., & MayerC. (1990). Capital markets and corporate control: A study of France, Germany and the UK.Economic Policy, April, 191–231.
14.
FriedV., & HisrichR. (1994). Towards a model of venture capital investment decision making.Financial Management, 23(3), 28–37.
15.
KeeleyR., & TurkiA. (1992). New ventures: How risky are they?. In ChurchillN., BirleyS., BygraveW., MuzykaD., WahlbinC., & WetzelW. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research 1992, pp. 1–15. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
16.
KeeleyR., & TurkiA. (1993). A new approach to the valuation of new ventures. In ChurchillN., BirleyS., BygraveW., DoutriauxJ., GatewoodE., HoyF., & WetzelW. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research 1993, pp. 661–675. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
17.
MacMillanI., SiegelR., & SubbanarasimhaP. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals.Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 119–128.
18.
MacMillanI., ZamannL., & SubbanarasimhaP. (1987). Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process.Journal of Business Venturing, 3(1), 123–137.
19.
ManigartS. (1994). The founding rates of venture capital firms in three European countries (1970-1990).Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 525–541.
20.
MoerlandP. W. (1995). Alternative disciplinary mechanisms in different corporate systems.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26(1), 17–34.
21.
MoizerP., & ArnoldJ. (1984). Share appraisal by investment analysts — Portfolio versus non-portfolio managers.Accounting and Business Research, 14(56), 341–348.
22.
MuzykaD., LeleuxB., & BirleyS. (1996). Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists.Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 273–287.
23.
PikeR., MeerjanssenJ., & ChadwickL. (1993). The appraisal of ordinary shares by investment analysts in the UK and Germany.Accounting and Business Research, 23(92), 489–499.
24.
SahlmanW. (1990). The structure and governance of venture capital organisations.Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473–524.
25.
SapienzaH., ManigartS., & VermeirW. (1996). Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries.Journal of Business Venturing, 11(6), 439–469.
26.
SteierL., & GreenwoodR. (1995). Venture capitalist relationships in the deal structuring and post-investment stages of new firm creation.Journal of Management Studies, 32(3), 337–357.
27.
WaldronD., & HubbardC.M. (1991). Valuation methods and estimates in relationship to investing versus consulting.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 43–51.
28.
WrightM., ThompsonS., & RobbieK. (1992). Venture capital and management-led leveraged buy-outs: A European perspective.Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 47–71.
29.
WrightM., RobbieK., WilsonN., BruiningJ., HerstA., & DesbrieresP. (1995). Dynamic entrepreneurs: Management buy-outs in the UK, France and Holland. Paper presented at the 6th European Foundation for Entrepreneurship Conference, University of Ghent, Belgium, November.
30.
WrightM., & RobbieK. (1996). Venture capitalists, unquoted equity investment appraisal and the role of accounting information.Accounting and Business Research, 26(2), 153–168.
