There are assumptions about copreneurs that they represent an emerging egalitarian style of family business ownership and that they operate in their marriages similarly to dual-career couples. Unfortunately, there has been little empirical research to support these assumptions. The current study examines these assumptions by comparing a population of copreneurs and dual-career couples on variables such as sex-role orientation, self-concept at work and home, and marital and business partnership equity. The findings indicate that copreneurs and dual-career couples define their work and home boundaries very differently. Recommendations for professional practice include (1) expanding the consultant's consciousness about these differences in couples, and (2) encouraging more egalitarian relationships between copreneurial husband and wife so as to better prepare the business for succession.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BailynL. (1970). Career and family orientations of husbands and wives in relation to marital happiness.Human Relations, 33(2), 97–113.
2.
BailynL., & ScheinE. (1976). Life/career considerations as indicators of quality of employment. In BidleymanA., & DrumgT. (Eds.), Measuring work quality for social reporting.New York: Sage Publications.
3.
BarnettF., & BarnettS. (1988). Working together: Entrepreneurial couples.Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.
4.
BartoloméF., & EvansP. (1979). Professional lives versus private lives—shifting patterns of managerial commitment.Organizational Dynamics, Spring, 3–29.
5.
BebbingtonA. (1973). The function of stress in the establishment of the dual-career family.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35, 530–537.
6.
BemS. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
7.
BiernatM., & WortmanC. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 844–860.
8.
BrysonR., BrysonJ., LichtM., & LichtB. (1976). The professional pair.American Psychologist, 31, 10–16.
9.
BurkeR., & WeirT. (1976). Relationship of wives’ employment status to husband, wife, and pair satisfaction and performance.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(2), 279–287.
10.
ChassinL., ZeissA., CooperK., & ReavenJ. (1985). Role perceptions, self-role congruence and marital satisfaction in dual-worker couples with preschool children.Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(4), 301–311.
11.
CooperK., ChassinL., BraverS., ZeissA., & KhavariK. (1986). Correlates of mood and marital satisfaction among dual-worker and single-worker couples.Social Psychology Quarterly, 49(4), 322–329.
12.
CoxJ., MooreK., & Van AukenP. (1984). Working couples in small business.Journal of Small Business Management, October, 24–30.
13.
DancoL. (1975). Beyond survival: A business owner's guide for success.Cleveland, OH: University Press.
14.
DesmanR., & BrushC. (1991). Family business: The state of the notion. Paper presented at the Family Firm Institute Conference, October, Beavercreek, Colorado.
15.
DurkheimE. (1947). Division of labor in society (G. Simpson, trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
16.
DyerW. G.Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
DyerW. G.Jr. (1988). Culture and continuity in family firms.Family Business Review, 1(1), 37–50.
18.
ElmanM., & GilbertL. (1984). Coping strategies for role conflict in married professional women with children.Family Relations, 33, 317–327.
19.
EpsteinC. (1970). Encountering the male establishment sex-status limits on women's careers in the professions.American Journal of Sociology, 75, 965–982.
20.
EpsteinC. (1971). Law partners and marital partners: Strains and solutions in the dual-career family enterprise.Human Relations, 24(6), 549–564.
21.
EricksenJ., YancyW., & EricksenE. (1979). The division of family roles.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(2), 301–313.
22.
EvansP., & BartoloméF. (1980). The relationship between professional and private life. In Brooklyn DerrC. (Ed.), Work, family, and the career.New York: Praeger.
23.
FriedlanderF. (1990). Work home identity scale. Unpublished manuscript, The Fielding Institute.
24.
FriedlanderF. (1993). Work and family: Is it simply a balancing act? Unpublished manuscript.
25.
Gillis-DonovanJ., & Moynihan-BradtC. (1990). The power of invisible women in the family business.Family Business Review, 3(2), 153–167.
26.
HallD., & RichterJ. (1988). Balancing work life and home life: What can organizations do to help?The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 213–223.
27.
HallF., & HallD. (1979). The two-career couple.Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
HeckmanN., BrysonR., & BrysonJ. (1977). Problems of professional couples: A content analysis.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 323–330.
29.
HoffmanL. W., & NyeF. (1974). Working mothers.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
HollanderB., & BukowitzW. (1990). Women, family culture, and family business.Family Business Review, 3(2), 139–151.
31.
HollanderB., & ElmanN. (1988). Family-owned business: An emerging field of inquiry.Family Business Review, 1(2), 145–164.
32.
JaffeD. (1990). Working with the ones you love: Conflict resolution & problem solving strategies for successful family business.Berkeley, CA: Conari Press.
33.
JohnsonC., & JohnsonF. (1977). Attitudes toward parenting in dual-career families.American Journal of Psychiatry, 134(4), 391–395.
34.
KanterR. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
KelleyH., & ThibautJ. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence.New York: John Wiley.
36.
KingsburyN., & ScanzoniJ. (1989). Process power and decision outcomes among dual-career couples.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 20(2), 231–246.
37.
LenneyE. (1991). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. In RobinsonJ., ShaverP., & WrightsmanL. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, pp. 573–643. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
LeslieL., & AndersonE. (1988). Men's and women's participation in domestic roles: Impact on quality of life and marital adjustment.Journal of Family Psychology, 2(2), 212–226.
39.
LymanA. (1988). Life in the family circle.Family Business Review, 1(4), 383–398.
40.
MarshackK. (1994). Love and work: How co-entrepreneurial couples manage the boundaries and transitions in personal relationship and business partnership. Doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara, California.
41.
MarxK., & EngelsF. (1939). The German ideology.New York: International Publishers.
42.
MoravitsM. (1989). The relationship of equity and gender to intimacy and marital adjustment in members of dual-career couples. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana.
43.
NearJ., RiceR., & HuntR. (1980). The relationship between work and nonwork domains: A review of empirical research.Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 415–429.
44.
NeltonS. (1986). In love and in business: How entrepreneurial couples are changing the rules of business and marriage.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
45.
OsgoodC., SuciG., & TannenbaumP. (1957). The measurement of meaning.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
46.
PolomaM. (1972). Role conflict and the married professional woman. In Safilios-RothschildC. (Ed.), Towards a sociology of women.Lexington MA: Xerox.
47.
PonthieuL., & CaudillH. (1993). Who's the boss? Responsibility and decision making in copreneurial ventures.Family Business Review, 6(1), 3–17.
48.
Prado-BorregoM. (1993). The effect of women's achievement on dual-career couples and its relation to division of labor and marital adjustment. Doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara, California.
49.
RachlinV., & HansenJ. (1985). The impact of egalitarianism on dual-career couples.Family Therapy, 12(2), 151–164.
50.
RapoportR., & RapoportR. (1965). Work and family in contemporary society.American Sociological Review, 30(3), 381–394.
RapoportR., & RapoportR. (1979). The dual-career family: A variant pattern and social change.Human Relations, 22, 3–29.
53.
RapoportR., RapoportR., & ThiessenV. (1974). Couple symmetry and enjoyment.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 558–591.
54.
ReinhartT. (1984). A study of the factors contributing to the degree of marital satisfaction achieved by dual-career couples. Doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara, California.
55.
RichterJ. (1984). The daily transitions between professional and private life. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
56.
RiegelK. (1976). The dialectics of human development.American Psychologist, 31, 689–700.
57.
RiegelK. (1979). Foundations of dialectical psychology.New York: Academic Press.
58.
SalganicoffM. (1990). Women in family businesses: Challenges and opportunities.Family Business Review, 3(2), 125–137.
59.
SkinnerD. (1980). Dual-career family stress and coping: A literature review.Family Relations, 29, 473–480.
60.
SpenceJ., & HelmreichR. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents.Austin: University of Texas Press.
61.
SpenceJ., HelmreichR., & StappJ. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–55.
62.
StephenT. (1984). A symbolic exchange framework for the development of intimate relationships.Human Relations, 37(5), 393–408.
63.
ThomasS., AlbrechtK., & WhiteP. (1984). Determinants of marital quality in dual-career couples.Family Relations, 33, 513–521.
64.
WeberM. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
65.
WendtS. (1982). A study of marital satisfaction for women in dual-career marriages. Doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara, California.
66.
WickerA., & BurleyK. (1991). Close coupling in work-family relationships: Making and implementing decisions in a new family business and at home.Human Relations, 44(1), 77–92.
