Over the years much has been written about the organization life cycle, yet there has been remarkably little attention given to the underlying construct of a life-cycle stage. It is proposed in this study that each life-cycle stage consists of a unique configuration of variables related to organization context and structure. Cluster analysis is used to derive a taxonomy of growth stage configurations in a sample of 126 high-technology organizations. The derived configurations suggest a sequence of four growth stages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdizesI. (1979). Organizational passages—Diagnosing and treating life cycle problems of organizations.Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 3–25.
2.
AdizesI. (1989). Corporate lifecycles: How and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BairdL., & MeshoulamI. (1988). Managing two fits of strategic human resource management.Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 116–126.
4.
BlauP. M., & SchoenherrR. (1971). The structure of organizations.New York: Basic Books.
5.
BlauP. M., & ScottW. R. (1962). The structure of organizations.New York: Basic Books.
6.
BlockZ., & MacMillanI. C. (1985). Milestones for successful venture planning.Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 184–196.
7.
Bureau of Economic and Business Research (1987). Utah's high-tech directory.Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
8.
CalinskiT., & HarabaszJ. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis.Communications in Statistics, 3, 1–27.
9.
ChandlerA. D. (1962). Strategy and structure.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Chemical Week (1984). The quest for high tech plant cites.Chemical Week, 5(24), 68–74.
11.
ChurchillN., & LewisV. (1983). The five stages of small business growth.Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.
12.
DavidsonP. (1989). Entrepreneurship—and after? A study of growth willingness in smaller firms.Journal of Business Venturing, 4(3), 211–226.
13.
DavisR. C. (1951). The fundamentals of top management.New York: Harper, Row & Brothers.
14.
DewarR., & HageJ. (1978). Size, technology, complexity and structural differentiation: Toward a theoretical synthesis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 111–136.
15.
DownsA. (1967). The life cycle of bureaus. In DownsA., Inside bureaucracy, pp. 296–309. San Francisco: Little, Brown and Company.
16.
DudaR. O., & HartP. E. (1973). Pattern classification and scene analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
EtzioniA. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations.New York: Free Press.
FileyA. C., & AldagR. J. (1980). Organizational growth and types: Lessons from small institutions. In StawB. M., & CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 2, pp. 279–321. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
FlamholtzE. G. (1986). Managing the transition from an entrepreneurship to a professionally managed firm.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
GalbraithJ. (1982). The stages of growth.Journal of Business Strategy, 3(4), 70–79.
23.
GnanadesikanR., KettenringJ. R., & LandwehrJ. M. (1977). Interpreting and assessing the results of cluster analysis.Bulletin of the Institute of International Statistics, 47, 451–463.
24.
GreenP. E. (1978). Analyzing multivariate data.Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
25.
GreinerL. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow.Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 37–46.
26.
HambrickD. C. (1984). Taxonomic approaches to studying strategy: Some conceptual and methodological issues.Journal of Management, 10(1), 27–41.
27.
HanksS. H. (1990a). An empirical examination of the organization life cycle in high technology organizations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.
28.
HanksS. H. (1990b). The organization life cycle: Integrating content and process.Journal of Small Business Strategy, 1(1), 1–13.
29.
HarriganK. R. (1985). An application of cluster analysis for strategic group analysis.Strategic Management Journal, 6, 55–73.
30.
KatzD., & KahnR. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations.New York: Wiley.
31.
KazanjianR. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures.Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279.
32.
KazanjianR. K., & DrazinR. (1990). A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new ventures.Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 137–150.
33.
KhandwallaP. N. (1977). The design of organizations.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
34.
KimberlyJ. R. (1979). Issues in the creation of organizations: Initiation, innovation, and institutionalization.Academy of Management Journal, 22, 437–457.
35.
KimberlyJ. R., & MilesR. H. (1980). The organization life cycle.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
MeyerD. G., LenoirR. M., & DeanT. J. (1988). The executive limit scenario in high technology firms. In Gomez-MejiaL. R., & LawlessM. W. (Eds.), Proceedings: Managing the High Technology Firm, pp. 342–349. Boulder CO: University of Colorado.
37.
MilesR. E. (1983). Remarks in The use and usefulness of the taxonomic approach to strategy research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas.
38.
MilesR. E., & SnowC. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process.New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
MillerD., & FriesenP. H. (1984a). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle.Management Science, 30(10), 1161–1183.
40.
MillerD., & FriesenP. H. (1984b). Organizations: A quantum view.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
MilliganG. W. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms.Psychometrika, 45, 325–342.
42.
MintzbergH. (1973). Strategy making in three modes.California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53.
43.
PinderC. C., & MooreL. F. (1979). The resurrection of the taxonomy to aid the development of middle range theories of organization behavior.Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 99–118.
PughD. S., & HinksonD. J. (1976). Organization structure in its context: The Aston Programme I.London: Saxon House.
46.
PunjG., & StewartD. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application.Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 134–148.
47.
QuinnR. E., & CameronK. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence.Management Science, 29(1), 33–51.
48.
RogersE. M., & LarsenJ. K. (1984). Silicon Valley fever: Growth of high technology culture.New York: Basic Books.
49.
SalterM. S. (1968). Stages of corporate development: Implications for management control. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
50.
SAS Institute (1985). SAS users guide: Basics (5th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
51.
SarleW. S. (1983). The cubic clustering criterion.SAS Technical Report A-108.Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
52.
ScottB. R., & BruceR. (1987). Five stages of growth in small business.Long Range Planning, 20(3), 45–52.
53.
ShaniA. B., DomiconeH. A., & PernerL. E. (1988). Stages of small business development, strategic management, decision making and performance: An exploration of causal relationships. Paper presented at the annual Human Resources Management and Organization Behavior Conference, Long Beach, CA, October, 1988.
54.
SmithK. G., MitchellT. R., & SummerC. E. (1985). Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle.Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 799–820.
55.
ThompsonD. (1967). Organization in action.New York: McGraw-Hill.
56.
TyebjeeT. T., BrunoA. B., & McIntyreS. H. (1983). Growing ventures can anticipate marketing changes.Harvard Business Review, 61(1), 62–66.
57.
WardJ. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.
58.
WatsonC. J. (1982). Approaches for the interpretation of multiple discriminant analysis in organizational research.Academy of Management Review, 7, 124–132.
