Survey data generated by four hundred small, United States manufacturers are analyzed seeking to compare exporters with non-exporters by number of employees, scope of international activities and, attitudes about the future role of exporting among small businesses. The paper concludes with three hypotheses regarding differences between small, U.S. exporters and small, U.S. non-exporters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CateoraPhilip R., and HessJohn M., International Marketing, Third Edition, Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1975.
2.
FayerweatherJohn, International Marketing, Second Edition, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1970.
3.
HackettDonald W., “Penetrating International Markets: Key Considerations For Smaller Firms.”Journal of Small Business Management, 15: 10–16, January, 1977.
4.
LangE.M., “How to Help Small Exporters.” Duns Review, 108: 85–86, December, 1976; “International Commerce Report,”Commerce American, 2: 14–19, July 4, 1977.
5.
LindscomCharles E., The Policy Making Process, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1968.
6.
Pagoulatos, and Sorensen, “Domestic Market Structure and International Trade: An Empirical Analysis.”The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 16: 45–49, Spring, 1976.
7.
PennyJames K., “The Process of Commitment to Foreign Trade: Selected Smaller Indiana Manufacturing Firms.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 1968; Hackett, Donald W., “A Comparison of Small Export and Domestic Oriented Manufacturers' Attitudes Regarding the National and International Marketplaces.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oklahoma, 1973.
8.
RootFranklin R., International Trade and Investment, Fourth Edition, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western Publishing, 1978.
9.
SteersRichard M., and PorterLyman W., Motivation and Work Behavior, New York New York: McGraw-Hill Publishers, 1975.