Just because we undertake value-neutral research to explain an entrepreneurial phenomenon does not mean we cannot extend our work through engaging values to prescribe what entrepreneurs (and/or other focal actors) should do. In this editorial, we illustrate how scholars can generate and offer prescriptive theorizing. Specifically, scholars can generate practical implications by (a) focusing on a phenomenon-based problem; (b) identifying focal actors and values; (c) defining desired outcomes; (d) developing an implementation roadmap; (e) thinking about reflexivity and boundaries; and (f) generating testable prescriptions. We offer additional considerations about when and for whom this prescriptive theorizing is most appropriate.
BauerM. S.DamschroderL.HagedornH.SmithJ.KilbourneA. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3(1), 32.
2.
ChaseS.ShepherdD. A.ParidaV.PatzeltH.WincentJ. (2026, Forthcoming). The glass is half full: A gendered model of illegal entrepreneurship. Journal of Management. DOI:10.5465/AMPROC.2025.13220
3.
CraneA.LeBaronG.PhungK.BehbahaniL.AllainJ. (2022). Confronting the business models of modern slavery. Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(3), 264–285.
4.
DamschroderL. J.AronD. C.KeithR. E.KirshS. R.AlexanderJ. A.LoweryJ. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50.
5.
DimovD.MaulaM.RommeA. G. L. (2023). Crafting and assessing design science research for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(5), 1543–1567.
6.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.
7.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotnyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM. (1994). The new production of knowledge. SAGE Publications.
8.
HanischM. (2024). Prescriptive theorizing in management research: A new impetus for addressing grand challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 61(4), 1692–1716.
9.
HornerS.CornelissenJ.ZundelM. (2024). Panacea or dangerous practice: A counterpoint to Hanisch’s argument for prescriptive theorizing. Journal of Management Studies, 61(4), 1717–1730.
10.
MunozP.DimovD. (2022). A translational framework for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, e00361.
11.
MunozP.DimovD. (2023). Facing the future through entrepreneurship theory: A prospective inquiry framework. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(4), 106303.
12.
RapportF.Clay-WilliamsR.ChurrucaK.ShihP.HogdenA.BraithwaiteJ. (2018). The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(1), 117–126.
13.
RommeA. G. L.ReymenI. M. (2018). Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: Toward an inclusive framework. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10, e00094.
14.
RousseauD. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management”?Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256–269.
15.
ShepherdD. A.MaitlisS.ParidaV.WincentJ.LawrenceT. B. (2022). Intersectionality in intractable dirty work: How Mumbai ragpickers make meaning of their work and lives. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1680–1708.
16.
ShepherdD. A.ParidaV.ChaseS.WincentJ. (2026, Forthcoming). Are you looking at me? Orchestrating voyeuristic events to reduce transgressions on those being observed. Academy of Management Journal. DOI:10.5465/amj.2024.1385
17.
ShepherdD. A.ParidaV.WilliamsT.WincentJ. (2022). Organizing the exploitation of vulnerable people: A qualitative assessment of human trafficking. Journal of Management, 48(8), 2421–2457.
18.
SimonH. A. (2019). The Sciences of the Artificial, reissue of the third edition with a new introduction by John Laird. MIT Press.
19.
StiglianiI.CorleyK. G.GioiaD. (2025). Thinking differently about thinking theoretically: Developing a design-centered approach to organizational theorizing. Journal of Management Inquiry. Advance online publication.
20.
TranM. H.WiklundJ.AntshelK.JhawarN.MontgomeryC. (2025). Entrepreneurship and ADHD: A meta-analytical assessment of the state-of-the-art and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 50(3), 789–829.
21.
TranM. H.WiklundJ.YuW.Perez-LunoA. (2025). ADHD and entrepreneurship: The role of perceived team conflict and gender on well-being:Small Business Economics, 6(1), 485–512.
22.
Van AkenJ. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246.
23.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press.
24.
WickertC. (2024). Prescriptive theorizing to tackle societal grand challenges: Promises and perils. Journal of Management Studies, 61(4), 1683–1691.
25.
WiklundJ.YuW.TuckerR.MarinoL. D. (2017). ADHD, impulsivity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 627–656.
26.
Wiltsey StirmanS.BeidasR. S. (2020). Expanding the reach of psychological science through implementation science. American Psychologist, 75(8), 1033.
