This study explores the role of investors’ counterfactual thinking regarding errors of commission and omission and how these relate to willingness to invest in new ventures. Drawing from behavioral economics and psychology, we focus on the salience of prospective counterfactuals at the screening stage. Our experimental findings demonstrate that increasing the salience of commission-related counterfactuals, particularly social counterfactuals, significantly reduces investors’ willingness to invest. This effect underscores the influence of anticipated regret, social comparison, and emotional responses in shaping investment behavior. By contrast, omission-related counterfactuals show no measurable impact, suggesting a prevailing not-investing norm and limited effect of potential fear of missing out among new-venture investors. Our results provide a deeper understanding of how investors navigate the tension between avoiding missed opportunities and minimizing losses, emphasizing the salience of situational triggers as opposed to stable traits or market-wide factors. These insights highlight the importance of counterfactual thinking as a theoretical lens for studying decision-making in the high-risk, high-reward context of new-venture investing.
AguinisH.BradleyK. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371.
2.
AguinisH.VillamorI.RamaniR. S. (2020). How to conduct valid social science research using MTurk—A checklist. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
3.
AndersonB. S.WennbergK.McMullenJ. S. (2019). Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105928.
4.
AntretterT.SirénC.GrichnikD.WincentJ. (2020). Should business angels diversify their investment portfolios to achieve higher performance? The role of knowledge access through co-investment networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(5), 106043.
5.
BachherJ. S.GuildP. D. (1996). Financing early-stage technology-based companies: Investment criteria used by investors. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 996, 363–376.
6.
BaddeleyM. (2010). Herding, social influence and economic decision-making: socio-psychological and neuroscientific analyses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1538), 281–290.
7.
BanerjeeA. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817.
8.
BaultN.CoricelliG.RustichiniA. (2008). Interdependent utilities: How social ranking affects choice behavior. PLOS ONE, 3(10), e3477.
9.
BellD. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961–981.
10.
BergenholtzC.KlyverK.VuculescuO. (2023). Self-efficacy in disrupted environments: COVID-19 as a natural experiment. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(3), 724–750.
11.
BhanotS. P. (2021). Isolating the effect of injunctive norms on conservation behavior: New evidence from a field experiment in California. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 163, 30–42.
12.
BikhchandaniS.SharmaS. (2000). Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers, 47(3), 279–310.
13.
BolesT. L.MessickD. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), 262–275.
14.
CaiJ.GomaaA. (2019). Initial coin offering to finance venture capital: A behavioral perspective. The Journal of Private Equity, 22(3), 93–101.
15.
CardonM. S.MittenessC.SudekR. (2017). Motivational cues and angel investing: Interactions among enthusiasm, preparedness, and commitment. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1057–1085.
16.
CardonM. S.WincentJ.SinghJ.DrnovsekM. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532.
17.
CarpentierC.SuretJ. M. (2015). Angel group members’ decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(6), 808–821.
18.
Cervantes-ZacarésD.Ortigosa-BlanchA.Martí-SánchezM. (2022). The influence of the media on the history of business success. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(1), 105–123.
19.
ConnollyT.ZeelenbergM. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6), 212–216.
20.
CooimanF. (2022). Imprinting the economy: The structural power of venture capital. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,56(2), 586–602.
21.
CoricelliG.RustichiniA. (2010). Counterfactual thinking and emotions: Regret and envy learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1538), 241–247.
22.
DimovD.De ClercqD. (2006). Venture capital investment strategy and portfolio failure rate: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 207–223.
23.
DimovD.ShepherdD. A.SutcliffeK. M. (2007). Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 481–502.
24.
DroverW.BusenitzL.MatusikS.TownsendD.AnglinA.DushnitskyG. (2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820–1853.
25.
DroverW.WoodM. S.ZacharakisA. (2017). Attributes of angel and crowdfunded investments as determinants of VC screening decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 323–347.
FeeneyL.Haines JrG. H.RidingA. L. (1999). Private investors’ investment criteria: Insights from qualitative data. Venture Capital, 1(2), 121–145.
28.
FehrE.SchmidtK. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.
29.
FeldmanG.KutscherL.YayT. (2020). Omission and commission in judgment and decision making: Understanding and linking action-inaction effects using the concept of normality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(8), e12557.
30.
FisherG.JosefyM. A.NeubertE. (2024). Event-based entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(1), 106366.
31.
FuY.TietzM. A. (2019). When do investors prefer copycats? Conditions influencing the evaluation of innovative and imitative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(4), 529–551.
32.
GarciaS. M.TorA.SchiffT. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634–650.
33.
GilovichT.MedvecV. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102(2), 379.
GompersP. A. (1996). Grandstanding in the venture capital industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(1), 133–156.
36.
GompersP. A.GornallW.KaplanS. N.StrebulaevI. A. (2020). How do venture capitalists make decisions?. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(1), 169–190.
37.
GoodM. C.HymanM. R. (2021). Direct and indirect effects of fear-of-missing-out appeals on purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 564–576.
38.
GulerI. (2007). Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(2), 248–285.
39.
HaarN. E.StarrJ.MacMillanI. C. (1988). Informal risk capital investors: Investment patterns on the East Coast of the USA. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(1), 11–29.
40.
HallJ.HoferC. W. (1993). Venture capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 25–42.
HettsJ. J.BoningerD. S.ArmorD. A.GleicherF.NathansonA. (2000). The influence of anticipated counterfactual regret on behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 17(4), 345–368.
43.
HeupelK.FonsecaJ. A.RutherfordM.EdwardsB. (2024). Feeding the hype cycle: Entrepreneurial swagger, passion, and inflated expectations. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(6), 106432.
44.
HsuD. K.HaynieJ. M.SimmonsS. A.McKelvieA. (2014). What matters, matters differently: A conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors. Venture Capital, 16(1), 1–25.
45.
HuangL. (2018). The role of investor gut feel in managing complexity and extreme risk. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1821–1847.
46.
HuangL.PearceJ. L. (2015). Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 634–670.
47.
HudsonE.EvansM. (2005). A review of research into venture capitalists’ decision making: Implications for entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and researchers. Journal of Economic & Social Policy, 10(1), 45–63.
48.
JohnsonE. J.GoldsteinD. (2003). Do defaults save lives?. Science, 302(5649), 1338–1339.
49.
KahnemanD.MillerD. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136.
50.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 363–391.
51.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246(1), 160–173.
52.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341.
53.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, 47(2), 99–127.
54.
KleinertS.HildebrandM. (2025). Venture capitalists’ decision-making in hot and cold markets: The effect of signals and cheap talk. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(2), 571–598.
55.
KleinertS.BaferaJ.UrbigD.VolkmannC. K. (2022). Access denied: How equity crowdfunding platforms use quality signals to select new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(6), 1626–1657.
56.
KőszegiB.RabinM. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133–1165.
57.
KumarS.ChaurasiaA. (2024). The relationship between emotional biases and investment decisions: A meta-analysis. IIMT Journal of Management, 1(2), 171–185.
58.
KuporS. (2019). Secrets of sand hill road: Venture capital and how to get it. Penguin.
59.
LandströmH. (1998). Informal investors as entrepreneurs: Decision-making criteria used by informal investors in their assessment of new investment proposals. Technovation, 18(5), 321–333.
60.
LejarragaT.SákovicsJ. (2025). Choosing is losing: How opportunity cost influences valuations and choice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 124, 102901.
61.
LernerD. A. (2016). Behavioral disinhibition and nascent venturing: Relevance and initial effects on potential resource providers. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2), 234–252.
62.
LernerJ. (2022). The syndication of venture capital investments. Venture Capital, 23(3), 207–218.
LindeJ.SonnemansJ. (2012). Social comparison and risky choices. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44, 45–72.
66.
LiuX.WangZ.ZhangS.LiuJ. (2020). Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making based on regret theory for the evaluation of venture capital projects. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 672–697.
67.
LoJ. Y.XuL.ParkH. D. (2024). Hot markets, sociocognitive cues, and new market entry in the US venture capital industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(2), 478–505.
68.
LoewensteinG. F.ThompsonL.BazermanM. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 426.
69.
MacMillanI. C.SiegelR.NarasimhaP. S. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 119–128.
70.
MaxwellA. L.JeffreyS. A.LévesqueM. (2011). Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 212–225.
71.
McKennyA. F.FisherG.ShortJ. C.Ketchen JrD. J.AllisonT. H. (2025). Communicating during societal crises: How entrepreneurs’ interactions with backers affect fundraising via crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(3), 782–816.
72.
MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.
73.
MoritzA.DiegelW.BlockJ.FischC. (2022). VC investors’ venture screening: The role of the decision maker’s education and experience. Journal of Business Economics, 92(1), 27–63.
74.
MurnieksC. Y.CardonM. S.SudekR.WhiteT. D.BrooksW. T. (2016). Drawn to the fire: The role of passion, tenacity and inspirational leadership in angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 468–484.
75.
MurnieksC. Y.HaynieJ. M.WiltbankR. E.HartingT. (2011). “I like how you think”: Similarity as an interaction bias in the investor–entrepreneur dyad. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1533–1561.
76.
MuzykaD.BirleyS.LeleuxB. (1996). Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 273–287.
77.
NandaR.Rhodes-KropfM. (2013). Investment cycles and startup innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 403–418.
78.
NandaR.SamilaS.SorensonO. (2020). The persistent effect of initial success: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 137(1), 231–248.
79.
PaulS.WhittamG.WyperJ. (2007). Towards a model of the business angel investment process. Venture Capital, 9(2), 107–125.
80.
PeerE.RothschildD.GordonA.EverndenZ.DamerE. (2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54(4), 1643–1662.
81.
PoindexterJ. B. (1976). The efficiency of financial markets: The venture capital case. New York University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
82.
PontikesE. G.BarnettW. P. (2017). The non-consensus entrepreneur: Organizational responses to vital events. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 140–178.
83.
PrzybylskiA. K.MurayamaK.DeHaanC. R.GladwellV. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.
RitovI.BaronJ. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3(4), 263–277.
86.
RitovI.BaronJ. (1995). Outcome knowledge, regret, and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), 119–127.
87.
Robinson JrR. B. (1987). Emerging strategies in the venture capital industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 53–77.
88.
SabiaL.BellR.BozwardD. (2022). Big fish: Leveraging the fear of missing out in equity crowdfunding in the post-COVID-19 era. Business Horizons, 65(1), 59–67.
89.
SahlmanW. A.StevensonH. H. (1985). Capital market myopia. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 7–30.
90.
SamuelsonW.ZeckhauserR. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
91.
SandbergW. R.SchweigerD. M.HoferC. W. (1988). The use of verbal protocols in determining venture capitalists’ decision processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter: 8–20.
92.
ShafiK. (2021). Investors’ evaluation criteria in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 56(1), 3–37.
93.
ShepherdD. A.ZacharakisA. (1999). Conjoint analysis: A new methodological approach for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Capital, 1(3), 197–217.
94.
SimonsonI. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 105–118.
95.
SohlJ. (2022). Angel investors: The impact of regret from missed opportunities. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2281–2296.
96.
SorensonO.StuartT. E. (2008). Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 266–294.
SouitarisV.ZerbinatiS.PengB.ShepherdD. (2020). Should I stay or should I go? Founder power and exit via initial public offering. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 64–95.
99.
SpenceM. (1978). Job market signaling. In DiamondP. A.RothschildM. (Eds.), Uncertainty in Economics (pp. 281–306). Academic Press.
100.
SprancaM.MinskE.BaronJ. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(1), 76–105.
101.
StevensonR. M.JosefyM. (2019). Knocking at the gate: The path to publication for entrepreneurship experiments through the lens of gatekeeping theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 242–260.
102.
StevensonR. M.KuratkoD. F.EutslerJ. (2019). Unleashing main street entrepreneurship: Crowdfunding, venture capital, and the democratization of new venture investments. Small Business Economics, 52, 375–393.
103.
SudekR. (2006). Angel investment criteria. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 89–104.
104.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
105.
TykocinskiO.PittmanT.TuttleE. (1995). Inaction inertia: Foregoing future benefits as a result of an initial failure to act. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68(5), 793.
Van OsnabruggeM. (2000). A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: An agency theory-based analysis. Venture Capital, 2(2), 91–109.
109.
WarnickB. J.MurnieksC. Y.McMullenJ. S.BrooksW. T. (2018). Passion for entrepreneurship or passion for the product? A conjoint analysis of angel and VC decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 315–332.
110.
WellsW. A. (1974). Venture capital decision making [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie-Mellon University.
111.
Wesemann LekkasH.AntretterT.ShepherdD.WincentJ. (2025). Following in the footsteps of others: Social proof in angel groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,49(4), 1037–1070.
112.
WoodM. S.LongA.ArtzK. (2020). Angel investor network pitch meetings: The pull and push of peer opinion. Business Horizons, 63(4), 507–518.
113.
WuH.LeungS. O. (2017). Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales?—A simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527–532.
ZacharakisA. (2010). Venture capitalists decision making: An information processing perspective. In CummingD. J. (Ed.), Venture Capital: Investment Strategies, Structures, and Policies (pp. 7–30). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
116.
ZacharakisA. L.ShepherdD. A. (2001). The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists’ decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 311–332.
117.
ZeelenbergM. (1999). Anticipated regret expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 93–106.
118.
ZeelenbergM.PietersR. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 3–18.
119.
ZeelenbergM.Van den BosK.Van DijkE.PietersR. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 314.
120.
ZhangR.YangX.LiN.KhanM. A. (2021). Herd behavior in venture capital market: Evidence from China. Mathematics, 9(13), 1509.
121.
ZörgiebelS. (2016). The rise of the unicorns-how media affects start-up valuations. SSRN 2808458.
