We conducted a three-step replication of Davidsson and Honig’s study on the roles of human and social capital in venture creation processes. First, we attempted an exact replication to rule out mistakes and questionable manipulations influencing the original results. Second, we included the initial stage of development as an additional control variable, reflecting on updates suggested in later research. Third, we extended the original analyses using a sample from a different spatiotemporal context, enhancing theoretical generalizability. We largely validate D&H’s findings, highlight the importance of modeling initial entrepreneurial processes, and emphasize the underappreciated complexities and value of replication studies.
AlomaniA.BaptistaR.AthreyeS. S. (2022). The interplay between human, social and cognitive resources of nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 59, 1301–1326.
2.
BanksG. C.RogelbergS. G.WoznyjH. M.LandisR. S.RuppD. E. (2016). Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31, 323–338.
3.
BaronR. A.MarkmanG. D. (2003). Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 41–60.
4.
Ben-HafaïedhC.HamelinA. (2023). Questioning the growth dogma: A replication study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(2), 628–647.
5.
BettisR. A.HelfatC. E.ShaverJ. M. (2016). The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2193–2203.
6.
BiQ.BohW. F.ChristopoulosG. (2021). Trust, fast and slow: A comparison study of the trust behaviors of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(6), 106160.
7.
BrännbackM.CarsrudA.RenkoM.ÖstermarkR.AaltonenJ.KiviluotoN. (2009). Growth and profitability in small privately held biotech firms: Preliminary findings. New Biotechnology, 25(5), 369–376.
8.
BrinkerinkJ.De MassisA.KellermannsF. (2022). One finding is no finding: Toward a replication culture in family business research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4), 100521.
9.
BurmeisterK.SchadeC. (2007). Are entrepreneurs’ decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 340–362.
10.
BusseC.KachA.WagnerS. M. (2016). Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609.
11.
CarterN. M.GartnerW. B.ShaverK. G.GatewoodE. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13–39.
12.
ChrismanJ. J.NeubaumD. O.WelterF.WennbergK. (2022). Knowledge accumulation in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 479–496.
13.
CliffJ. E.JenningsP. D.GreenwoodR. (2006). New to the game and questioning the rules: The experiences and beliefs of founders who start imitative versus innovative firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 633–663.
14.
CrawfordG. C.SkorodziyevskiyV.FridC. J.NelsonT. E.BooyaviZ.HechavarriaD. M.LiX.ReynoldsP. D.TeymourianE. (2022). Advancing entrepreneurship theory through replication: A case study on contemporary methodological challenges, future best practices, and an entreaty for communality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 779–799.
15.
CulverS. M.WarfvingeP. (2013). Assessment, accountability, and educational quality in the United States and Sweden. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 10–23.
16.
CurtinR. T.ReynoldsP. D. (2018). Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics, PSED II, United States, 2005–2011. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37202.v1
17.
DavidssonP. (2016). Researching entrepreneurship: Conceptualization and design. Springer.
18.
DavidssonP. (2023). Making contributions: Personal reflections from the co-creative evolution of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 61(4), 1391–1410.
19.
DavidssonP.GordonS. R. (2012). Panel studies of new venture creation: A methods-focused review and suggestions for future research. Small Business Economics, 39, 853–876.
20.
DavidssonP.GruenhagenJ. H. (2021). Fulfilling the process promise: A review and agenda for new venture creation process research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1083–1118.
21.
DavidssonP.HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
22.
DavidssonP.BergmannH.GordonS. R. (2011). Nascent entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Pub. Ltd.
23.
DavidssonP.SteffensP.FitzsimmonsJ. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: putting the horse in front of the cart?Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 388–406.
24.
DelmarF.DavidssonP. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(1), 1–23.
25.
DiamantopoulosA.RieflerP.RothK. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218.
26.
DimovD. (2010). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1123–1153.
27.
EdwardsJ. R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 370–388.
28.
Fors ConnollyF.Johansson SeväI. (2018). Social status and life satisfaction in context: A comparison between Sweden and the USA. International Journal of Wellbeing, 8(2), 110–134.
29.
FreseM.RousseauD. M.WiklundJ. (2014). The emergence of evidence–based entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 209–216.
30.
GartnerW. B.ShaverK. G.CarterN. M.ReynoldsP. D. (2004). Handbook of Entrepreneurial dynamics: The process of business creation. Sage Publication.
31.
GrégoireD. A.BinderJ. K.RauchA. (2019). Navigating the validity tradeoffs of entrepreneurship research experiments: A systematic review and best-practice suggestions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(2), 284–310.
32.
HenreksonM.SanandajiT. (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(5), 1760–1765.
33.
HonigB.LampelJ.BaumJ. A.GlynnM. A.JingR.LounsburyM.SchüßlerE.SirmonD. G.TsuiA. S.WalshJ. P.Van WitteloostuijnA. (2018). Reflections on scientific misconduct in management: Unfortunate incidents or a normative crisis?Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 412–442.
34.
HoppC.StephanU. (2012). The influence of socio-cultural environments on the performance of nascent entrepreneurs: Community culture, motivation, self-efficacy and start-up success. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(9–10), 917–945.
35.
HubbardR.LindsayR. M. (2013). From significant difference to significant sameness: Proposing a paradigm shift in business research. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1377–1388.
36.
KepesS.KeenerS. K.McDanielM. A.HartmanN. S. (2022). Questionable research practices among researchers in the most research-productive management programs. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(7), 1190–1208.
37.
KlyverK.AreniusP. (2022). Networking, social skills and launching a new business: A 3-year study of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(5), 1256–1283.
38.
LiuD.MorgesonF. P.ZhuJ.FanX. (2023). Event-oriented organizational behavior research: A multilevel review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 2148–2186.
39.
LokenE.GelmanA. (2017). Measurement error and the replication crisis. Science, 355(6325), 584–585.
40.
MansikkamäkiS. (2023). Firm growth and profitability: The role of age and size in shifts between growth–profitability configurations. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, e00372.
41.
MarkinE. T.SkorodziyevskiyV.ZhuL.ChrismanJ. J.FangH. (2022). Lone-founder firms in China: Replicating Miller et al. (2007) in a different context. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4), 100451.
42.
MartinB. C.McNallyJ. J.KayM. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224.
43.
MarvelM. R.LumpkinG. T. (2007). Technology entrepreneurs’ human capital and its effects on innovation radicalness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 807–828.
44.
MarvelM. R.DavisJ. L.SproulC. R. (2016). Human capital and entrepreneurship research: A critical review and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 599–626.
45.
MaulaM.StamW. (2020). Enhancing rigor in quantitative entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6), 1059–1090.
46.
MooreD. A.OeschJ. M.ZietsmaC. (2007). What competition? Myopic self-focus in market-entry decisions. Organization Science, 18(3), 440–454.
47.
MoseyS.WrightM. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology–based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909–935.
48.
O’BoyleE. H.Jr.RutherfordM. W.BanksG. C. (2014). Publication bias in entrepreneurship research: An examination of dominant relations to performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(6), 773–784.
49.
ReynoldsP. D. (2007). New firm creation in the United States a PSED I overview. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1–150.
50.
ReynoldsP. D. (2009). Screening item effects in estimating the prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 33, 151–163.
51.
ReynoldsP. D. (2016). Start-up actions and outcomes: What entrepreneurs do to reach profitability. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 12(6), 443–559.
52.
ReynoldsP. D.CurtinR. T. (2008). Business creation in the United States: Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II initial assessment. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 155–307.
53.
ReynoldsP. D.CarterN. M.GartnerW. B.GreeneP. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23, 263–284.
54.
ReynoldsP. D.HechavarriaD.TianL. R.SamuelssonM.DavidssonP. (2016). Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics: A five cohort outcomes harmonized data set. Research Gate, 1–48.
55.
RyanJ. C.TipuS. A. (2022). Business and management research: Low instances of replication studies and a lack of author independence in replications. Research Policy, 51(1), 104408.
56.
SalvatoC.MelinL. (2008). Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Business Review, 21(3), 259–276.
57.
SamuelssonM.DavidssonP. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33, 229–255.
58.
SchleicherA. (2009). Securing quality and equity in education: Lessons from PISA. Prospects, 39(3), 251–263.
59.
SchwartzS. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explications and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–182.
60.
ShimJ.DavidssonP. (2018). Shorter than we thought: The duration of venture creation processes. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 9, 10–16.
61.
StamW.ArzlanianS.ElfringT. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 152–173.
62.
UngerJ. M.RauchA.FreseM.RosenbuschN. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341–358.
63.
WeilerM.HinzO. (2019). Without each other, we have nothing: A state-of-the-art analysis on how to operationalize social capital. Review of Managerial Science, 13, 1003–1035.
64.
WelterF. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.
65.
WelterF.BakerT.AudretschD. B.GartnerW. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—a call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.
66.
WrightM.HmieleskiK. M.SiegelD. S.EnsleyM. D. (2007). The role of human capital in technological entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 791–806.
67.
ZhouL.WangM.ZhangZ. (2021). Intensive longitudinal data analyses with dynamic structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 24(2), 219–250.
