Researchers are divided on whether shareholder agreements (SAs) improve or hurt firm value. We offer family firms as a context where SAs add value and explain why; SAs limit “superprincipal” agency conflicts between family owners and other family members. A panel of French firms and a second study of French Initial Public Offerings show shareholders value SAs more in family than in nonfamily firms. Among family firms, SAs add greater value when weak governance undermines family owners’ resistance to other family members’ demands. Our study helps reconcile competing theory about SAs and distinguishes superprincipal conflicts from other family-firm agency problems.
ArikanA. M.CapronL. (2010). Do newly public acquirers benefit or suffer from their pre-IPO affiliations with underwriters and VCs?Strategic Management Journal, 31(12), 1257–1289. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.861
3.
ArteagaR.Menéndez-RequejoS. (2017). Family constitution and business performance: moderating factors. Family Business Review, 30(4), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517732438
4.
BaglioniA. (2011). Shareholders agreements and voting power: Evidence from Italian listed firms. Applies Economics, 43(27), 4043–4052. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036841003781494
5.
BarontiniR.BozziS. (2011). Board compensation and ownership structure: Empirical evidence for Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9118-5
6.
BarontiniR.CaprioL. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00273.x
7.
BeckertJ. (2008). Inherited wealth. Princeton University Press.
8.
BelotF.GinglingerE.SlovinM. B.SushkaM. E. (2014). Freedom of choice between unitary and two-tier boards: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 112, 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.011
9.
BennedsenM.NielsenK. M.Pérez-GonzálezF.WolfenzonD. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.73
13.
BianchiM.BiancoM.EnriquesL. (2001). Pyramidal groups and the separation between ownership and control in Italy. In F. Barca & M. Becht (Eds.). The control of corporate Europe (pp. 154–187). Oxford University Press.
14.
Binz-AstrachanC. B.AstrachanJ. H.KotlarJ.MichielsA. (2021). Addressing the theory-practice divide in family business research: The case of shareholder agreements. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100395
15.
BloomN.Van ReenenJ. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.1.203
16.
BoydB. K.SolarinoA. M. (2016). Ownership of corporations: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1282–1314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316633746
17.
BrighamK. H.PayneG. T. (2015). The transitional nature of the multifamily business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1339–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12173
18.
Bruehlman-SenecalE.AydukO. (2015). This too shall pass: Temporal distance and the regulation of emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038324
CarneyM.Van EssenM.GedajlovicE. R.HeugensP. P. M. A. R. (2015). What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 513–544. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12054
21.
CarvalhalA. (2012). Do shareholder agreements affect market valuation? Evidence from Brazilian listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.04.003
22.
ChahineS. (2007). Investor interest, trading volume, and the choice of IPO mechanism in France. International Review of Financial Analysis, 16(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2005.10.002
23.
ChahineS.FilatotchevI. (2008). The effects of information disclosure and board independence on IPO discount. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00241.x
ChemlaG.HabibM. A.LjungqvistA. (2007). An analysis of shareholder agreements. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.1.93
26.
ChiricoF.IrelandR. D.PittinoD.Sanchez-FamosoV. (2022). Radical innovation in (multi) family owned firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106194
27.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.LitzR. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00049.x
28.
ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.KimT. (2021). A dynamic framework of noneconomic goals and inter-family agency complexities in multi-family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 906–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211005775
29.
ClaessensS.DjankovS.FanJ. P.LangL. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511
30.
CrisóstomoV. L.de Freitas BrandãoI. (2019). The ultimate controlling owner and corporate governance in Brazil. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2018-0043
31.
CronqvistH.NilssonM. (2003). Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126740
32.
Da SilvaA. L. P.LanaJ.MarconR. (2018). Agreeing and impacting: The effect of the shareholders agreement on firms market value. Brazilian Business Review, 15(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2018.15.1.6
33.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.MazzolaP.MinolaT.SciasciaS. (2018). Conflicting selves: Family owners’ multiple goals and self-control agency problems in private firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 362–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12257
34.
De MiguelA.PindadoJ.De La TorreC. (2004). Ownership structure and firm value: New evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1199–1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.430
DesenderK. A.AguileraR. V.CrespiR.Garcia-CestonaM. (2013). When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2046
37.
EddlestonK. A.OtondoR. F.KellermannsF. W. (2008). Conflict, participative decision-making, and generational ownership dispersion: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 456–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00252.x
38.
EdmansA.HoldernessC. G. (2017). Blockholders: A survey of theory and evidence. In HermalinB. E.WeisbachM. S. (Eds.), The Handbook of the economics of corporate governance (pp. 541–636). North-Holland.
FerrisG. R.FrinkD. D.GalangM. C.ZhouJ.KacmarK. M.HowardJ. L. (1996). Perceptions of organizational politics: Prediction, stress-related implications, and outcomes. Human Relations, 49(2), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900206
41.
GersickK. E.DavidJ. A.McCollomM.LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business Press.
42.
GianfrateG. (2007). What do shareholders coalitions really want? Evidence from Italian voting trusts. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00549.x
43.
GoergenM.KhurshedA.RenneboogL. (2009). Why are the French so different from the Germans? Underpricing of IPOs on the Euro New Markets. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(3), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.02.006
44.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
45.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Núñez-NickelM.GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069338
46.
GompersP. A.IshiiJ.MetrickA. (2010). Extreme governance: An analysis of dual-class firms in the United States. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1051–1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp024
47.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
48.
HabibM. A.LjungqvistA. P. (2001). Underpricing and entrepreneurial wealth losses in IPOs: Theory and evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.2.433
49.
HairJ. F.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.MenaJ. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
50.
HanleyK. W. (1993). The underpricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenon. Journal of Financial Economics, 34(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90019-8
HaynesG. W.WalkerR.RoweB. R.HongG. S. (1999). The intermingling of business and family finances in family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 12(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00225.x
53.
HoffmannC.JaskiewiczP.WulfT.CombsJ. G. (2017). The effect of transgenerational control intention on family firm performance: It depends who pursues it. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(3), 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717730025
54.
HumphreyR. H.MassisA. D.PiconeP. M.TangY.PiccoloR. F. (2021). The psychological foundations of management in family firms: Emotions, memories, and experiences. Family Business Review, 34(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/089448652110121
55.
IaquintoA. L.FredricksonJ. W. (1997). Top management team agreement about the strategic decision process: A test of some of its determinants and consequences. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<63::AID-SMJ835>3.0.CO;2-N
56.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.RauS. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001
57.
JohnsonS.La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.22
58.
JonesL. V. (1952). Tests of hypotheses: One-sided versus two-sided alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056832
59.
JudgeW. Q.WittM. A.ZattoniA.TalaulicarT.ChenJ. J.LewellynK.HuH. W.ShuklaD.Greg BellR.GabrielssonJ.LopezF.YamakS.FassinY.McCarthyD.RivasJ. L.FainshmidtS.Van EesH. (2015). Corporate governance and IPO underpricing in a cross-national sample: A multilevel knowledge-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36(8), 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2275
60.
KahnR. J.WhitedT. M. (2016). Identification with models and exogenous data variation. Foundations & Trends in Accounting, 10(2–4), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000051
61.
Kets de VriesM. F. K. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90071-8
62.
KotlarJ.SignoriA.De MassisA.VismaraS. (2018). Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1073–1099. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0256
63.
KoroppC.GrichnikD.KellermannsF. W. (2013). Financial attitudes in family firms: Opening the black box. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(1), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00380.x
64.
KudlatsJ.McDowellW. C.MahtoR. V. (2019). Unrelated but together: Trust and intergroup relations in multi-family businesses. Journal of Business Research, 101, 750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.073
65.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
66.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.LesterR. H. (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22(3), 704–721. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0541
67.
LeitterstorfM. P.RauS. B. (2014). Socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing of family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2236
68.
LinsK. V. (2003). Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 38, 159–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126768
69.
LongR. G.MathewsK. M. (2011). Ethics in the family firm: Cohesion through reciprocity and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121217
70.
López-IturriagaF. J.Santana-MartínD. J. (2015). Do shareholder coalitions modify the dominant owners control? The impact on dividend policy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(6), 519–533.
71.
LubatkinM. H.LingY.SchulzeW. S. (2007). An organizational justice-based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00673.x
72.
LuoX. R.ChungC. N. (2013). Filling or abusing the institutional void? Ownership and management control of public family businesses in an emerging market. Organization Science, 24(2), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0751
73.
MagrelliV.RovelliP.BenedettiC.ÜberbacherR.De MassisA. (2022). Generations in family business: A multifield review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 35(1), 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/089448652110697
74.
MancinelliL.OzkanA. (2006). Ownership structure and dividend policy: Evidence from Italian firms. European Journal of Finance, 12(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470500249365
75.
MasulisR. W.MobbsS. (2011). Are all inside directors the same? Evidence from the external directorship market. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 823–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01653.x
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business Press.
78.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H. (2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional versus strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0728
79.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
80.
MorckR.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90048-7
NordqvistM.MelinL. (2010). The promise of the strategy as practice perspective for family business strategy research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2009.12.001
83.
PetersenM. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
84.
PiconeP. M.De MassisA.TangY.PiccoloR. F. (2021). The psychological foundations of management in family firms: Values, biases, and heuristics. Family Business Review, 34(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520985630
85.
PieperT. M.KleinS. B.JaskiewiczP. (2008). The impact of goal alignment on board existence and top management team composition: Evidence from family-influenced businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00249.x
86.
PieperT. M.SmithA. D.KudlatsJ.AstrachanJ. H. (2015). The persistence of multifamily firms: Founder imprinting, simple rules, and monitoring processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12179
87.
PrüglR.SpitzleyD. I. (2021). Responding to digital transformation by external corporate venturing: An enterprising family identity and communication patterns perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12578
88.
RitterJ. R. (1984). The “hot issue” market of 1980. Journal of Business, 57(2), 215–240.
89.
RoosenboomP.SchramadeW. (2006). The price of power: Valuing the controlling position of owner—managers in French IPO firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.001
90.
SchlingemannF. P.StulzR. M.WalklingR. A. (2002). Divestitures and the liquidity of the market for corporate assets. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00073-9
91.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N (2003a). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040613
92.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N (2003b). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00054-5
93.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
94.
SemadeniM.WithersM. C.Trevis CertoS. (2014). The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2136
95.
SiebelsJ. F.Zu Knyphausen-AufseßD.SchweizerL. (2017). Explaining conflicts between active and non-active shareholders in family firms. Schmalenbach Business Review, 18(4), 305–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-017-0037-8
96.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013
97.
SorensonR. L. (2000). The contribution of leadership style and practices to family and business success. Family Business Review, 13(3), 183–200.
98.
SraerD.ThesmarD. (2007). Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(4), 709–751. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.4.709
StrikeV. M.BerroneP.SappS. G.CongiuL. (2015). A socioemotional wealth approach to CEO career horizons in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 52(4), 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12123
101.
VaraiyaN.KerinR. A.WeeksD. (1987). The relationship between growth, profitability, and firm value. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080507
102.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
103.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2009). How are U.S. family firms controlled?Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3047–3091. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn080
VolpinP. F. (2002). Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00071-5
106.
WolfoldsS. E.SiegelJ. (2019). Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two-step method without a valid instrument. Strategic Management Journal, 40(3), 432–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2995
107.
YangK. P.SchwarzG. M. (2016). A multilevel analysis of the performance implications of excess control in business groups. Organization Science, 27(5), 1219–1236. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1086
108.
YoshikawaT.RasheedA. A. (2010). Family control and ownership monitoring in family-controlled firms in Japan. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00891.x
109.
WaddockS. A.GravesS. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
110.
ZhouX. (2001). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance: Comment. Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00085-X
