Research on entrepreneurial crowdfunding has focused limited attention to the role of category in investors’ decisions. We examine the legitimacy spillover effect of projects within the same category of industry on the focal project’s fundraising. We decompose category legitimacy into two types—stable versus transient—and investigate their distinct effects on fundraising. Our dataset, derived from 31,767 projects on Kickstarter from 2010 to 2020, confirms the spillover effect of category legitimacy on entrepreneurial fundraising. Furthermore, the spillover effect of stable legitimacy is much stronger than that of transient legitimacy, and this effect weakens when entrepreneurs have greater past successes.
AgrawalA.CataliniC.GoldfarbA. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/674021
2.
AgrawalA.CataliniC.GoldfarbA. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12093
3.
AllisonT. H.DavisB. C.WebbJ. W.ShortJ. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002
4.
ArnaboldiV.ContiM.PassarellaA.PezzoniF. (2012, September3–5). Analysis of ego network structure in online social networks. [Conference session]. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.41
5.
BarnettM. L.KingA. A. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1150–1170. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.35732609
6.
BarneyJ. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(01)00115-5
BerghD. D.KetchenD. J.Jr.OrlandiI.HeugensP. P.BoydB. K. (2019). Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318798026
9.
BitektineA. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382
10.
BitektineA.HaackP. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318
11.
CarrollG. R.HannanM. T. (2000). The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press.
12.
ChaiS.DoshiA. R.SilvestriL. (2021). How catastrophic innovation failure affects organizational and industry legitimacy: The 2014 Virgin Galactic test flight crash. Organization Science, 33(3), 873–1249. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1467
13.
ChaikenS.TropeY. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.
14.
CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press.
15.
ColomboM. G.FranzoniC.Rossi–LamastraC. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12118
16.
CourtneyC.DuttaS.LiY. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
DeephouseD. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147–166.
19.
DeephouseD. L.BundyJ.TostL. P.SuchmanM. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 27–54). SAGE.
20.
DesaiV. M. (2011). Mass media and massive failures: Determining organizational efforts to defend field legitimacy following crises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263082
21.
DesaiV. M. (2014). The impact of media information on issue salience following other organizations’ failures. Journal of Management, 40(3), 893–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311418663
22.
DierickxI.CoolK. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
23.
DiestreL.RajagopalanN. (2014). Toward an input-based perspective on categorization: Investor reactions to chemical accidents. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1130–1153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1096
24.
Díez-MartínF.Blanco-GonzálezA.Prado-RománC. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: A co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1007–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00380-6
25.
Díez-MartínF.MiottoG.Cachón-RodríguezG. (2022). Organizational legitimacy perception: Gender and uncertainty as bias for evaluation criteria. Journal of Business Research, 139, 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.073
26.
DobrevS. D.OzdemirS. Z.TeoA. C. (2006). The ecological interdependence of emergent and established organizational populations: Legitimacy transfer, violation by comparison, and unstable identities. Organization Science, 17(5), 577–597.
27.
DorobantuS.HeniszW. J.NarteyL. (2017). Not all sparks light a fire: Stakeholder and shareholder reactions to critical events in contested markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(3), 561–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216687743
28.
DroverW.BusenitzL.MatusikS.TownsendD.AnglinA.DushnitskyG. (2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820–1853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317690584
DurandR.PaolellaL. (2013). Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1100–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01039.x
31.
DurandR.ThorntonP. H. (2018). Categorizing institutional logics, institutionalizing categories: A review of two literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 631–658. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0089
32.
DurandR.VergneJ. P. (2015). Asset divestment as a response to media attacks in stigmatized industries. Strategic Management Journal, 36(8), 1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2280
33.
FisherG.KothaS.LahiriA. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
34.
FisherG.KuratkoD. F.BloodgoodJ. M.HornsbyJ. S. (2017). Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.005
35.
GafniH.MaromD.RobbA.SadeO. (2021). Gender dynamics in crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on entrepreneurs, backers, and taste-based discrimination. Review of Finance, 25(2), 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa041
36.
GafniH.MaromD.SadeO. (2019). Are the life and death of an early-stage venture indeed in the power of the tongue? Lessons from online crowdfunding pitches. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1293
37.
GarudR.SchildtH. A.LantT. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0915
38.
GlynnM. A.NavisC. (2013). Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12023
39.
GoldfarbB.ZavyalovaA.PillaiS. (2018). Did victories in certification contests affect the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry during 1895–1912? A replication study. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2335–2361. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2911
40.
GomulyaD.MishinaY. (2017). Signaler credibility, signal susceptibility, and relative reliance on signals: How stakeholders change their evaluative processes after violation of expectations and rehabilitative efforts. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 554–583. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.1041
41.
Gordo-MolinaV.Diez-MartinF.Del-Castillo-FeitoC. (2022). Legitimacy in entrepreneurship. Intellectual structure and research trends. Cuadernos de Gestión, 22(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.5295/CDG.211471VG
42.
HaackP.PfarrerM. D.SchererA. G. (2014). Legitimacy-as-feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacy spillovers in transnational governance. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 634–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12071
43.
HannanM. T.CarrollG. R. (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. Oxford University Press.
44.
HannanM. T.PólosL.CarrollG. R. (2007). Logics of organization theory: Audiences, codes, and ecologies. Princeton University Press.
45.
HausmanJ. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
46.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/257008
47.
HoffmanA. J.OcasioW. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.414.10639
48.
HongY.HuY.BurtchG. (2015, December13–16). How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?[Conference session]. 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
49.
HsuG.GrodalS. (2015). Category taken-for-grantedness as a strategic opportunity: The case of light cigarettes, 1964 to 1993. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 28–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414565391
50.
HsuG.HannanM. T.KoçakÖ. (2009). Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400108
51.
JeppersonR. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). SAGE.
52.
JiangH.WangZ.YangL.ShenJ.HahnJ. (2021). How rewarding are your rewards? A value-based view of crowdfunding rewards and crowdfunding performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(3), 562–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720928922
53.
JonssonS.GreveH. R.Fujiwara-GreveT. (2009). Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 195–228. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.195
54.
JosefyM.DeanT. J.AlbertL. S.FitzaM. A. (2017). The role of community in crowdfunding success: Evidence on cultural attributes in funding campaigns to “save the local theater”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12263
55.
KahnemanD. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
56.
KahnemanD.FrederickS. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge University Press.
57.
KahnemanD.SlovicS. P.SlovicP.TverskyA. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
58.
KennedyM. T.LounsburyM. (2010). Category currency: The changing value of conformity as a function of ongoing meaning construction. In LounsburyM. (Ed.), Categories in markets: Origins and evolution (pp. 369–397). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
KoçakÖ.HannanM. T.HsuG. (2009). Audience structure and category systems in markets. Stanford University Graduate School of Business.
61.
Koschate-FischerN.HoyerW. D.WolframmC. (2019). What if something unexpected happens to my brand? Spillover effects from positive and negative events in a co-branding partnership. Psychology & Marketing, 36(8), 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21210
62.
KostovaT.ZaheerS. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/259037
63.
KuilmanJ. G.LiJ. (2009). Grades of membership and legitimacy spillovers: Foreign banks in Shanghai, 1847–1935. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37308018
LeeB. H.HiattS. R.LounsburyM. (2017). Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organization Science, 28(3), 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1126
66.
LeeH.-H. M.van DolenW. (2015). Creative participation: Collective sentiment in online co-creation communities. Information & Management, 52(8), 951–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.07.002
67.
LiJ.YangJ. Y.YueD. R. (2007). Identity, community, and audience: How wholly owned foreign subsidiaries gain legitimacy in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159846
68.
LiM. Y.MakinoS.JiangC. (2019). Does national sentiment affect foreign direct investment, and if so, how? Additional evidence. International Business Review, 28(5), 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101586
69.
LiZ.JarvenpaaS. (2015). Motivating IT-mediated crowds: The effect of goal setting on project performance in online crowdfunding (NET Institute Working Paper No. 15-07). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2672056
70.
LiangK.-Y.ZegerS. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
71.
LounsburyM.GlynnM. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6–7), 545–564. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.188
72.
LounsburyM.RaoH. (2004). Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Social Forces, 82(3), 969–999. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2004.0046
73.
MaierL.BaccarellaC. V.BlockJ. H.WagnerT. F.VoigtK.-I. (2021). The legitimization effect of crowdfunding success: A consumer perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211057025
74.
MarkusH.ZajoncR. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 137–230). Random House.
75.
MéricJ.IsabelleM.BrabetJ. (2016). International perspectives on crowdfunding: Positive, normative and critical theory. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
76.
MishinaY.BlockE. S.MannorM. J. (2012). The path dependence of organizational reputation: How social judgment influences assessments of capability and character. Strategic Management Journal, 33(5), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.958
MurrayA.KothaS.FisherG. (2020). Community-based resource mobilization: How entrepreneurs acquire resources from distributed non-professionals via crowdfunding. Organization Science, 31(4), 960–989. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1339
80.
NaumovskaI.ZajacE. J. (2022). How inductive and deductive generalization shape the guilt-by-association phenomenon among firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 33(1): 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1440
81.
NavisC.GlynnM. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/41149175
NegroG.KoçakÖ.HsuG. (2010). Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. In LounsburyM. (Ed.), Categories in markets: Origins and evolution (pp. 3–35). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
84.
NielsenK. R.BinderJ. K. (2021). I am what I pledge: The importance of value alignment for mobilizing backers in reward-based crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(3), 531–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720929888
85.
OoP. P.AllisonT. H.SahaymA.JuasrikulS. (2019). User entrepreneurs’ multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: Effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.005
86.
PaolellaL.DurandR. (2016). Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 330–351. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0651
87.
ParkB.RoganM. (2019). Capability reputation, character reputation, and exchange partners’ reactions to adverse events. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0445
88.
ParuchuriS.MisangyiV. F. (2015). Investor perceptions of financial misconduct: The heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0704
89.
Pe’erA.VertinskyI.KeilT. (2016). Growth and survival: The moderating effects of local agglomeration and local market structure. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2331
90.
PetkovaA. P.WadhwaA.YaoX.JainS. (2014). Reputation and decision making under ambiguity: A study of US venture capital firms’ investments in the emerging clean energy sector. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0651
91.
PlummerL. A.AllisonT. H.ConnellyB. L. (2016). Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1585–1604. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0100
92.
PollackJ. M.MaulaM.AllisonT. H.RenkoM.GüntherC. C. (2021). Making a contribution to entrepreneurship research by studying crowd-funded entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719888640
93.
PontikesE. G.BarnettW. P. (2017). The non-consensus entrepreneur: Organizational responses to vital events. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 140–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216661150
94.
PowellW. W.ColyvasJ. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). SAGE.
95.
RaoH.MoninP.DurandR. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/367917
96.
RidgewayC. L.BergerJ. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51(5), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095487
97.
RogersE. M.SinghalA.QuinlanM. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Routledge.
98.
ScottW. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. SAGE.
99.
SharkeyA. J. (2014). Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. American Journal of Sociology, 119(5), 1380–1433. https://doi.org/10.1086/675385
100.
ShiW.WajdaD.AguileraR. V. (2022). Interorganizational spillover: A review and a proposal for future research. Journal of Management, 48(1), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211040554
101.
ShortJ. C.KetchenD. J.Jr.McKennyA. F.AllisonT. H.IrelandR. D. (2017). Research on crowdfunding: Reviewing the (very recent) past and celebrating the present. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12270
102.
SoublièreJ.-F.GehmanJ. (2020). The legitimacy threshold revisited: How prior successes and failures spill over to other endeavors on Kickstarter. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 472–502. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1103
103.
StankoM. A.HenardD. H. (2016). How crowdfunding influences innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(3), 15.
104.
StarrJ. A.MacMillanI. C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 79–92.
105.
SteigenbergerN.WilhelmH. (2018). Extending signaling theory to rhetorical signals: Evidence from crowdfunding. Organization Science, 29(3), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1195
106.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
TaeuscherK.BounckenR.PeschR. (2021). Gaining legitimacy by being different: Optimal distinctiveness in crowdfunding platforms. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0620
109.
ThiesF.WesselM.BenlianA. (2014, December14–17). Understanding the dynamic interplay of social buzz and contribution behavior within and between online platforms: Evidence from crowdfunding[Conference session]. The 35th International Conference on Information Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.
110.
TiroleJ. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). The Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298112
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
113.
VergneJ.-P. (2012). Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed-methods study of the global arms industry, 1996–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1027–1052. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0599
114.
VergneJ. P.WryT. (2014). Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 56–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12044
115.
VerhaalJ. C.HoskinsJ. D.LundmarkL. W. (2017). Little fish in a big pond: Legitimacy transfer, authenticity, and factors of peripheral firm entry and growth in the market center. Strategic Management Journal, 38(12), 2532–2552. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2681
116.
WeberK.HeinzeK. L.DeSouceyM. (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 529–567. https://doi.org/10.2307/27749277
117.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-Consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
118.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.
119.
YakubovichV.LupD. (2006). Stages of the recruitment process and the referrer’s performance effect. Organization Science, 17(6), 710–723. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0214
120.
YuT.SengulM.LesterR. H. (2008). Misery loves company: The spread of negative impacts resulting from an organizational crisis. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159407
121.
ZimmermanM. A.ZeitzG. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134387
122.
ZottC.HuyQ. N. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.70
123.
ZuckermanE. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438. https://doi.org/10.1086/210178
124.
ZuckermanE. W. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 591–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667110
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
