How Starting Strategy and Network Structure Shape Problemistic Search: An Examination of Venture Capital Firms

Abstract

Building on the behavioral theory of the firm, we empirically examine how starting strategies and syndication networks can influence venture capital (VC) firms’ problemistic search. We propose that: (a) depending on a VC’s strategic starting point, that is, the VC’s extent of specialization, the directionality of problemistic search may change to either expanding or contracting search activities; and (b) depending on search direction, structural holes in syndication networks can either impede or facilitate the problemistic search process. In a sample of U.S. VC firms, we find results consistent with our predictions, which have important implications for entrepreneurship and organizational strategy research.

Keywords

behavioral theory of the firm structural holes syndication networks portfolio strategy venture capital

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angus

R. W

. (2019). Problemistic search distance and entrepreneurial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 40(12), 2011–2023.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3068

Aral

Brynjolfsson

. (2012). Three-way complementarities: Performance pay, human resource analytics, & information technology. Management Science, 58(5), 913–931.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1460

Arellano

Bond

. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence & an application to employment equations. The Review of economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Audia

P. G.

Greve

H. R

. (2006). Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, & factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science, 52(1), 83–94.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446

Batjargal

Hitt

M. A.

Tsui

A. S.

Arregle

J.-L.

Webb

J. W.

Miller

T. L

. (2013). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs’ social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0095

Baum

J. A. C.

Rowley

T. J.

Shipilov

Chuang

Y. T

. (2005). Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative science quarterly, 50(4), 536–575.https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.536

Baum

J. A. C.

Silverman

B. S

. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 411–436.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00038-7

Bonacich

. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113–120.https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806

Brander

J. A.

Amit

Antweiler

. (2002). Venture‐capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 11(3), 423–452.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2002.00423.x

10.

Bromiley

Harris

J. D

. (2014). A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3), 338–357.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2191

11.

Bromiley

Washburn

. (2011). Cost reduction vs innovative search in R&D. Journal of Strategy and Management, 4(3), 196–214.

12.

Buchner

Mohamed

Schwienbacher

. (2017). Diversification, risk, and returns in venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 519–535.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.005

13.

Burt

. (2008). Industry performance and indirect access to structural holes. In Baum

J. A. C.

Rowley

T. J.

(Eds.), Advances in strategic management ( (Network strategyVols. Vol. 25, pp. 315–360). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.

14.

Burt

R. S

. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.https://doi.org/10.1086/421787

15.

Bygrave

W. D

. (1987). Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 139–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90004-8

16.

Chen

W. R.

Miller

K. D

. (2007). Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 369–381.

17.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S

. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

18.

Coleman

J. S

. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

19.

Coleman

J. S

. (1990). Foundations of social capital. Belknap.

20.

Cressy

Malipiero

Munari

. (2014). Does VC fund diversification pay off? An empirical investigation of the effects of VC portfolio diversification on fund performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), 139–163.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0218-8

21.

Cumming

Fleming

Schwienbacher

. (2009). Style drift in private equity. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(5–6), 645–678.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02137.x

22.

Cyert

R. M.

March

J. G

. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Halls.

23.

De Clercq

Dimov

. (2008). Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 585–612.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00747.x

24.

Drover

Busenitz

Matusik

Townsend

Anglin

Dushnitsky

. (2017). A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: Venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820–1853.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317690584

25.

Eggers

J. P.

Kaul

. (2018). Motivation & ability? A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 67–93.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1123

26.

Fitza

Matusik

S. F.

Mosakowski

. (2009). Do VCs matter? The importance of owners on performance variance in start-up firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 387–404.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.748

27.

Gaba

Bhattacharya

. (2012). Aspirations, innovation, and corporate venture capital: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 178–199.https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1133

28.

Gaba

Joseph

. (2013). Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organization Science, 24(4), 1102–1119.https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0788

29.

Gavetti

Greve

H. R.

Levinthal

D. A.

Ocasio

. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. The Academy of Management annals, 6(1), 1–40.https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.656841

30.

Gelman

Park

D. K

. (2009). Splitting a predictor at the upper quarter or third and the lower quarter or third. The American Statistician, 63(1), 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.0001

31.

Glasmeier

. (1991). Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy, 20(5), 469–485.https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90070-7

32.

Gompers

P. A

. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1461–1489.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05185.x

33.

Gompers

Kovner

Lerner

. (2009). Specialization and success: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 817–844.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00230.x

34.

Gompers

Lerner

. (1998). Venture capital distributions: Short-Run and Long-Run reactions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 2161–2183.https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00086

35.

Gompers

Lerner

. (2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 145–168.https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.145

36.

Greve

H. R

. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.

37.

Greve

H. R

. (2008). A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 476–494.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32625975

38.

Harrell

. (2008). Problems caused by categorizing continuous variables. Vanderbilt University. https://biostat.app.vumc.org/wiki/Main/CatContinuous

39.

Hochberg

Ljungqvist

. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 251–301.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01207.x

40.

Hsu

D. H

. (2004). What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1805–1844.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00680.x

41.

Iyer

D. N.

Baù

Chirico

Patel

P. C.

Brush

T. H

. (2019). The triggers of local and distant search: Relative magnitude and persistence in explaining acquisition relatedness. Long Range Planning, 52(5), 101825.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.03.001

42.

Kacperczyk

Beckman

C. M.

Moliterno

T. P

. (2015). Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 228–262.

43.

Kim

Finkelstein

Haleblian

. (2015). All aspirations are not created equal: The differential effects of historical and social aspirations on acquisition behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1361–1388.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1102

44.

Krehbiel

T. C

. (2004). Correlation coefficient rule of thumb. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 97–100.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-7315.2004.00025.x

45.

Krueger

. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–21.https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879301800101

46.

Kuusela

Keil

Maula

. (2017). Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, Slack resources, and resource-consuming vs. resource-freeing organizational change. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5), 1101–1120.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2544

47.

Leonard-Barton

. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009

48.

Makarevich

. (2018). Ties of survival: Specialization, inter-firm ties, and firm failure in the U.S. venture capital industry. Journal of Business Research, 86(3), 153–165.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.001

49.

Manigart

Lockett

Meuleman

Wright

Landström

Bruining

Desbrières

Hommel

. (2006). Venture capitalists’ decision to syndicate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 131–153.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00115.x

50.

Matusik

S. F.

Fitza

M. A

. (2012). Diversification in the venture capital industry: Leveraging knowledge under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4), 407–426.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1942

51.

Menon

A. R.

Yao

D. A

. (2017). Elevating repositioning costs: Strategy dynamics and competitive interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(10), 1953–1963.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2635

52.

Miller

T. L.

Wesley

C. L

. (2010). Assessing mission and resources for social change: An organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists decision criteria. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 705–733.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00388.x

53.

Nahapiet

Ghoshal

. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225

54.

National Venture Capital Association . (2011). Venture impact: The economic importance of venture backed companies to the US economy. National Venture Capital Association.

55.

Norton

Tenenbaum

B. H

. (1993). Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5), 431–442.https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90023-X

56.

Palich

L. E.

Cardinal

L. B.

Miller

C. C

. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 155–174.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200002)21:2<155::AID-SMJ82>3.0.CO;2-2

57.

Parker

O. N.

Krause

Covin

J. G

. (2017). Ready, set, slow: How aspiration-relative product quality impacts the rate of new product introduction. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2333–2356.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315569314

58.

Petkova

A. P.

Wadhwa

Yao

Jain

. (2014). Reputation and decision making under ambiguity: A study of US venture capital firms' investments in the emerging clean energy sector. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 422–448.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0651

59.

Podolny

J. M

. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60.https://doi.org/10.1086/323038

60.

Posen

H. E.

Keil

Kim

Meissner

F. D

. (2018). Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 208–251.https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0018

61.

Roodman

. (2009). Mixed-process models with cmp. In DC09 Stata Conference (No. 11). Stata Users Group.

62.

Sapienza

H. J.

Amason

A. C

. (1993). Effects of innovativeness and venture stage on venture capitalist-entrepreneur relations. Interfaces, 23(6), 38–51.https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.23.6.38

63.

Shepherd

D. A

. (2003). Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 318–328.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416377

64.

Shijaku

Larraza-Kintana

Urtasun-Alonso

. (2020). Network centrality and organizational aspirations: A behavioral interaction in the context of international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 813–828.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0166-4

65.

Shipilov

. (2008). Can you have your cake and eat it too? structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 73–108.https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.1.73

66.

Shipilov

Greve

H. R

. (2011). The prince & the pauper: Search & brokerage in the initiation of status-heterophilous ties. Organization Science, 22(6), 1418–1434.https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0594

67.

Simon

. (1947). Administrative behavior: A story of decision processes in business organization. Macmillan.

68.

Smith

K. G.

Grimm

C. M

. (1987). Environmental variation, strategic change & firm performance: A study of railroad deregulation. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 363–376.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080406

69.

Sorenson

Stuart

T. E

. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. The American journal of sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588.https://doi.org/10.1086/321301

70.

Sorenson

Stuart

T. E

. (2008). Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 266–294.https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.2.266

71.

Steffens

P. R.

Weeks

C. S.

Davidsson

Isaak

. (2014). Shouting from the ivory tower: A marketing approach to improve communication of academic research to entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 399–426.https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12079

72.

Ter Wal

A. L. J.

Alexy

Block

Sandner

P. G

. (2016). The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures' success. Administrative science quarterly, 61(3), 393–432.https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216637849

73.

Titus

Parker

Covin

. (2020). Organizational aspirations and external venturing: The contingency of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(4), 645–670.https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719838473

74.

Tyler

B. B.

Caner

. (2016). New product introductions below aspirations, slack and R&D alliances: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 896–910.

75.

Uzzi

. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808

76.

Vanacker

Forbes

D. P

. (2016). Disentangling the multiple effects of affiliate reputation on resource attraction in new firms. Organization Science, 27(6), 1525–1547.https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1090

77.

Vanacker

Forbes

D. P.

Knockaert

Manigart

. (2020). Signal strength, media attention, and resource mobilization: Evidence from new private equity firms. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1082–1105.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0356

78.

Washburn

Bromiley

. (2012). Comparing aspiration models: The role of selective attention. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5), 896–917.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01033.x

79.

Wiklund

Shepherd

D. A

. (2011). Where to from here? EO-as-experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 925–946.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00454.x

80.

Yang

Narayanan

V. K.

De Carolis

D. M

. (2014). The relationship between portfolio diversification and firm value: The evidence from corporate venture capital activity. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1993–2011.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2190

81.

Zajac

E. J.

Shortell

S. M

. (1989). Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 413–430.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100503