Crowdfunded microlending research implies that both communal and agentic characteristics are valued. These characteristics, however, are often viewed as being at odds with one another due to their association with gender stereotypes. Drawing upon expectancy violation theory and research on gender stereotypes, we theorize that gender-counterstereotypical facial expressions of emotion provide a means for entrepreneurs to project “missing” agentic or communal characteristics. Leveraging computer-aided facial expression analysis to analyze entrepreneur photographs from 43,210 microloan appeals, we show that women benefit from stereotypically masculine facial expressions of anger and disgust, whereas men benefit from stereotypically feminine facial expressions of sadness and happiness.
AbrahamM. (2020). Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 151–180.doi:10.1177/0001839219832813
2.
AllisonT. H.DavisB. C.ShortJ. C.WebbJ. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53–73.doi:10.1111/etap.12108
3.
AllisonT. H.DavisB. C.WebbJ. W.ShortJ. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707–725.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002
4.
AllisonT. H.McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C. (2013). The effect of entrepreneurial rhetoric on microlending investment: An examination of the warm-glow effect. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 690–707.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.003
5.
AnglinA. H.CourtneyC.AllisonT. H. (2021). Venturing for others, subject to role expectations? a role Congruity theory approach to social venture crowd funding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(1), 104225872110245.doi:10.1177/10422587211024545
6.
AnglinA. H.ShortJ. C.DroverW.StevensonR. M.McKennyA. F.AllisonT. H. (2018). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470–492.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003
7.
AnglinA. H.ShortJ. C.KetchenD. J.AllisonT. H.McKennyA. F. (2020). Third-party signals in crowdfunded microfinance: The role of microfinance institutions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(4), 623–644.doi:10.1177/1042258719839709
8.
AnglinA. H.WolfeM. T.ShortJ. C.McKennyA. F.PidduckR. J. (2018). Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 780–812.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.004
9.
BalachandraL.BriggsT.EddlestonK.BrushC. (2019). Don’t pitch like a girl!: How gender stereotypes influence investor decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 116–137.doi:10.1177/1042258717728028
BattilanaJ.LeeM. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing – insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
12.
ShieldsS. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 301–311.doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
13.
BattilanaJ.PacheA. C.SengulM.ModelJ. (2012). Combining Social Welfare and Market Logics: What drives social performance in socioeconomic hybrids?Academy of Management Proceedings, Briarcliff Manor, NY.. 2012. 13268
14.
ShenL.DillardJ. P. (2007). The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34(4), 433–467.doi:10.1177/0093650207302787
15.
BirdB.BrushC. (2002). A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 41–65.doi:10.1177/104225870202600303
16.
BirnbaumD.ChemelskiB. (1984). Preschoolers’ inferences about gender and emotion: The mediation of emotionality stereotypes. Sex Roles, 10(7–8), 505–511.doi:10.1007/BF00287259
17.
BrescollV. L.UhlmannE. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological science, 19(3), 268–275.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x18315800
18.
BrutonG. D.KhavulS.ChavezH. (2011). Microlending in emerging economies: Building a new line of inquiry from the ground up. Journal of international business Studies, 42(5), 718–739.doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.58
19.
BrutonG.KhavulS.SiegelD.WrightM. (2015). New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and Peer–to–Peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 9–26.doi:10.1111/etap.12143
20.
CalvoM. G.Fernández-MartínA.RecioG.LundqvistD. (2018). Human observers and automated assessment of dynamic emotional facial expressions: KDEF-dyn database validation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2052.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02052
21.
CardonM. S.FooM.-D.ShepherdD.WiklundJ. (2012). Exploring the heart: Entrepreneurial emotion is a hot topic. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 1–10.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00501.x
22.
CarverC. S.Harmon-JonesE. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204.doi:10.1037/a0013965
23.
DavisB. C.HmieleskiK. M.WebbJ. W.CoombsJ. E. (2017). Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90–106.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.006
24.
De BruinA.BrushC. G.WelterF. (2007). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31(3), 323–339.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00176.x
25.
DiefendorffJ. M.GregurasG. J. (2009). Contextualizing emotional display rules: Examining the roles of targets and discrete emotions in shaping display rule perceptions. Journal of Management, 35(4), 880–898.doi:10.1177/0149206308321548
26.
DouglasE. J.ShepherdD. A.PrenticeC. (2020). Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105970.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105970
27.
DurikA. M.HydeJ. S.MarksA. C.RoyA. L.AnayaD.SchultzG. (2006). Ethnicity and gender stereotypes of emotion. Sex Roles, 54(7–8), 429–445.doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9020-4
28.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Erlbaum.
29.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797.doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00241
30.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.57312088246
31.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. InEckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp.123–174). Erlbaum.
32.
EkmanP. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200.doi:10.1080/02699939208411068
33.
EkmanP. (1999). Facial expressions. InDalgleishT.PowerM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp.301–320). Wiley.
34.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1978). Facial action coding systems. Consulting Psychologists Press.
35.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Cambridge University Press.
36.
Figueroa-ArmijosM.BernsJ. P. (2021). Vulnerable populations and individual social responsibility in prosocial crowdfunding: Does the framing matter for female and rural entrepreneurs?Journal of Business Ethics, 1(2).doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04712-0
37.
FooM. D. (2011). Emotions and entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 375–393.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00357.x
38.
GalakJ.SmallD.StephenA. T. (2011). Microfinance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(SPL), S130–S137.doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S130
39.
GanleJ. K.AfriyieK.SegbefiaA. Y. (2015). Microcredit: Empowerment and disempowerment of rural women in Ghana. World Development, 66(1), 335–345.doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.027
GrayJ. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge University Press.
42.
GrayJ. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition & Emotion, 4(3), 269–288.doi:10.1080/02699939008410799
43.
HancockA.-M. (2007). Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm. Politics & Gender, 3(02), 248.doi:10.1017/S1743923X07000062
44.
HareliS.HessU. (2010). What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception. Cognition & Emotion, 24(1), 128–140.doi:10.1080/02699930802613828
45.
HareliS.ZoharE.DavidS.LasalleM.HessU. (2014). Seeing what you ought to see: The role of contextual factors in the social perception of achievement emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 38(4), 600–608.doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9396-3
46.
Harmon-JonesE. (2003). Anger and the behavioral approach system. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 995–1005.doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00313-6
47.
Harmon-JonesC.SchmeichelB. J.MennittE.Harmon-JonesE. (2011). The expression of determination: Similarities between anger and approach-related positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 172–181.doi:10.1037/a002096620853981
48.
HarrisonR. T.MasonC.SmithD. (2015). Heuristics, learning and the business angel investment decision-making process. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(9–10), 527–554.doi:10.1080/08985626.2015.1066875
49.
HeilmanM. E.ChenJ. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 431–441.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431
50.
HessU.AdamsR.KleckR. (2005). Who may frown and who should smile? Dominance, affiliation, and the display of happiness and anger. Cognition & Emotion, 19(4), 515–536.doi:10.1080/02699930441000364
51.
HessU.AdamsR. B.KleckR. E. (2004). Facial appearance, gender, and emotion expression. Emotion, 4(4), 378–388.doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.4.37815571436
52.
HmieleskiK. M.SheppardL. D. (2019). The yin and yang of entrepreneurship: Gender differences in the importance of communal and agentic characteristics for entrepreneurs’ subjective well-being and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), 709–730.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.006
JancenelleV. E.JavalgiR. R. G. (2018). The effect of moral foundations in prosocial crowdfunding. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 36(8), 932–951.doi:10.1177/0266242618793200
55.
JiangL.YinD.LiuD. (2019). Can joy buy you money? The impact of the strength, duration, and phases of an entrepreneur’s peak displayed joy on funding performance. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1848–1871.doi:10.5465/amj.2017.1423
56.
JussimL.ColemanL. M.LerchL. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 536–546.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
57.
KeckS. (2019). Gender, leadership, and the display of empathic anger. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(4), 953–977.doi:10.1111/joop.12264
58.
KhavulS.BrutonG. D.WoodE. (2009). Informal family business in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1219–1238.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00342.x
59.
KrumhuberE.KüsterD.NambaS.ShahD.CalvoM. G. (2020). Emotion recognition from posed and spontaneous dynamic expressions: Human observers vs. machine analysis. Emotion.doi:10.1037/emo0000712
60.
LaFranceM.HenleyN. M. (1994). On oppressing hypotheses: Or differences in nonverbal sensitivity revisited. InRadtkeH. L.StamH. J. (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp.287–311). Sage Publications.
61.
LeeM.HuangL. (2018). Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organization Science, 29(1), 1–16.doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1172
62.
LeeS. W.EllsworthP. C. (2013). Maggots and morals: Physical disgust is to fear as moral disgust is to anger. InSchererK. R.FontaineJ. R. J. (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp.271–280). Oxford University Press.
63.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.14611474720
64.
LoijensL.KripsO. (2018). Face reader methodology note. A white paper by Noldus Information Technology. Noldus.
65.
LuceyP.CohnJ. F.KanadeT.SaragihJ.AmbadarZ.MatthewsI. (2010). The extended cohn-kanade dataset (ck+): A complete dataset for action unit and emotion-specified expression. In2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition-Workshops (pp.94–101). IEEE.
66.
LuceyB. M.DowlingM. (2005). The role of feelings in investor decision-making. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(2), 211–237.doi:10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00245.x
67.
MalmströmM.JohanssonJ.WincentJ. (2017). Gender stereotypes and venture support decisions: How governmental venture capitalists socially construct entrepreneurs’ potential. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 833–860.doi:10.1111/etap.12275
68.
McKennyA. F.AguinisH.ShortJ. C.AnglinA. H. (2018). What doesn’t get measured does exist: Improving the accuracy of computer-aided text analysis. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2909–2933.doi:10.1177/0149206316657594
69.
McMullenJ. S.WarnickB. J. (2016). Should we require every new venture to be a hybrid organization?Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 630–662.doi:10.1111/joms.12150
70.
MossT. W.NeubaumD. O.MeyskensM. (2015). The effect of virtuous and entrepreneurial orientations on microfinance lending and repayment: A signaling theory perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 27–52.doi:10.1111/etap.12110
71.
MossT. W.RenkoM.BlockE.MeyskensM. (2018). Funding the story of hybrid ventures: Crowdfunder lending preferences and linguistic hybridity. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 643–659.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.004
72.
MotroD.EllisA. P. J. (2017). Boys, don’t cry: Gender and reactions to negative performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 227–235.doi:10.1037/apl0000175
73.
NewhagenJ. E. (1998). Tv news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: Effects on approach‐avoidance and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(2), 265–276.doi:10.1080/08838159809364448
74.
O’Boyle Jr.E.AguinisH. (2012). The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 79–119.doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01239.x
PlantE. A.HydeJ. S.KeltnerD.DevineP. G. (2000). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 81–92.doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01024.x
77.
PlutchikR. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. Harper and Row.
78.
PorterT. H.GerhardtM. W.FieldsD.BugenhagenM. (2019). An exploratory study of gender and motivation to lead in millennials. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(2), 138–152.doi:10.1080/00224545.2019.157090231002295
79.
RahmanA. (2019). Women and microcredit in rural Bangladesh: An anthropological study of Grameen bank lending. Routledge.
80.
RidgewayC. L. (2006). Expectation states theory and emotion. InStetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp.347–367). Springer.
81.
RosetteA. S.TostL. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 221–235.doi:10.1037/a001820420230065
82.
SchaumbergR. L.FlynnF. J. (2017). Self-reliance: A gender perspective on its relationship to communality and leadership evaluations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1859–1881.doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0018
83.
ScheafD. J.DavisB. C.WebbJ. W.CoombsJ. E.BornsJ.HollowayG. (2018). Signals’ flexibility and interaction with visual cues: Insights from crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 720–741.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.007
84.
ShaverP.SchwartzJ.KirsonD.O’ConnorC. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1061–1086.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.10613598857
85.
SmithA. N.WatkinsM. B.BurkeM. J.ChristianM. S.SmithC. E.HallA.SimmsS. (2013). Gendered influence: A gender role perspective on the use and effectiveness of influence tactics. Journal of management, 39(5), 1156–1183.
86.
StockliS.Schulte-MecklenbeckM.BorerS.SamsonS. (2019). A practical guide for automated facial expression classification. InSchulte-MecklenbeckM.KuehbergerA.JohnsonJ. G. (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods (2nd ed.,pp.198–216). Routledge.
87.
StroeS.SirénC.ShepherdD.WincentJ. (2020). The dualistic regulatory effect of passion on the relationship between fear of failure and negative affect: Insights from facial expression analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105948.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105948
88.
TiedensL. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 86–94.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.86
89.
Van KleefG. A.De DreuC. K.MansteadA. S. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. InZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp.45–96). Academic Press.
90.
VrtickaP.LordierL.BediouB.SanderD. (2014). Human amygdala response to dynamic facial expressions of positive and negative surprise. Emotion, 14(1), 161–169.doi:10.1037/a003461924219397
91.
WangS. (2018). Face size biases emotion judgment through eye movement. Scientific Reports, 8(1), article 317.doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18741-929321649
92.
WarnickB. J.DavisB. C.AllisonT. H.AnglinA. H. (2021). Express yourself: Facial expression of happiness, anger, fear, and sadness in funding pitches. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), 106109.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106109
93.
WarnickB. J.MurnieksC. Y.McMullenJ. S.BrooksW. T. (2018). Passion for entrepreneurship or passion for the product? A conjoint analysis of angel and Vc decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 315–332.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.002
94.
YamakawaY.KhavulS.PengM. W.DeedsD. L. (2013). Venturing from emerging economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(3), 181–196.doi:10.1002/sej.1158
95.
YounkinP.KuppuswamyV. (2018). The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Science, 64(7), 3269–3287.doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2774
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
