Drawing on image-based versus concept-based rhetoric research, we test whether concept-based rhetoric—evoking rational, logical, and concrete thinking—could be less useful than image-based rhetoric—evoking more primal, imaginative, and irrational imagery—in driving crowdfunding performance. We further examine how these forms of narrative rhetoric might serve to moderate the relationship between narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance. Based on a sample of 75,636 Kickstarter projects, image-based rhetoric is positively related to crowdfunding performance, and concept-based language suppressed the relationship between narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance. Our findings have implications for understanding how narrative elements interact to influence crowdfunding outcomes.
AckermanR. A.WittE. A.DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.KashyD. A. (2011). What does the narcissistic personality inventory really measure?Assessment, 18(1), 67–87.doi:10.1177/107319111038284520876550
2.
AgrawalA.CataliniC.GoldfarbA. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14, 63–97.doi:10.1086/674021
3.
AllisonT. H.DavisB. C.ShortJ. C.WebbJ. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53–73.doi:10.1111/etap.12108
4.
AllisonT. H.DavisB. C.WebbJ. W.ShortJ. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707–725.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002
5.
AnglinA. H.AllisonT. H.McKennyA. F.BusenitzL. W. (2014). The role of charismatic rhetoric in crowdfunding: An examination with computer-aided text analysis. InSocial entrepreneurship and research methods (pp.19–48). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
6.
AnglinA. H.ShortJ. C.DroverW.StevensonR. M.McKennyA. F.AllisonT. H. (2018a). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470–492.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003
7.
AnglinA. H.WolfeM. T.ShortJ. C.McKennyA. F.PidduckR. J. (2018). Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 679–732.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.004
8.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
9.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 132–145.doi:10.1037/a001633820053038
10.
BateyM.FurnhamA. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.doi:10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-43018341234
11.
BergerA. A. (2013). Dictionary of advertising and marketing concepts. Left Coast Press.
12.
BriggsM. A.LassiterG. D. (1994). More evidence for the robustness of salience effects. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(1), 171.
13.
BrocknerJ.HigginsE. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35–66.doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
14.
CampbellW. K.GoodieA. S.FosterJ. D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17(4), 297–311.doi:10.1002/bdm.475
15.
CariolaL. A. (2014). A corpus-based psychodynamic analysis of body boundary imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 11(4), 318–338.doi:10.1002/aps.1364
16.
Charteris-BlackJ. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Springer.
17.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386.doi:10.2189/asqu.52.3.351
18.
ChaykinaT.GuerreiroM.MendesJ. (2014). Destination brand personality of Portugal for the Russian-speaking market. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 2(1), 23–40.
19.
DavisB. C.HmieleskiK. M.WebbJ. W.CoombsJ. E. (2017). Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90–106.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.006
20.
DickinsonK. A.PincusA. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207.doi:10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.2214612839099
21.
EmrichC. G.BrowerH. H.FeldmanJ. M.GarlandH. (2001). Images in words: Presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 527–557.doi:10.2307/3094874
22.
FischerE.Rebecca ReuberA.ReuberA. R. (2014). Online entrepreneurial communication: Mitigating uncertainty and increasing differentiation via Twitter. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 565–583.
23.
FriendlyM.FranklinP. E.HoffmanD.RubinD. C. (1982). The Toronto word pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14(4), 375–399.
24.
GalvinB. M.WaldmanD. A.BalthazardP. (2010). Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 509–537.
25.
GamacheD. L.McNamaraG.MannorM. J.JohnsonR. E. (2015). Motivated to acquire? The impact of CEO regulatory focus on firm acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1261–1282.
26.
GassR. H.SeiterJ. S. (2015). Persuasion: Social inflence and compliance gaining. Routledge.
27.
GeigerM.OranburgS. C. (2018). Female entrepreneurs and equity crowdfunding in the US: Receiving less when asking for more. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10, e00099.
28.
GoncaloJ. A.FlynnF. J.KimS. H. (2010). Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1484–1495.doi:10.1177/014616721038510920947771
29.
GrantA. M. (2012). Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 458–476.
30.
HenryE. (2008). Are investors influenced by how earnings press releases are written?Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 363–407.doi:10.1177/0021943608319388
31.
HmieleskiK. M.LernerD. A. (2016). The dark triad and nascent entrepreneurship: An examination of unproductive versus productive entrepreneurial motives. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(3), 7–32.
32.
JohnsonM. A.StevensonR. M.LetwinC. R. (2018). A woman’s place is in the… startup! Crowdfunder judgments, implicit bias, and the stereotype content model. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 813–831.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.003
33.
JudgeT. A.LePineJ. A.RichB. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 762–776.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.76216834504
34.
KahnemanD. (2000). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. Choices, Values, and Frames, 693–708.
35.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
36.
KouniosJ.HolcombP. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 804–823.doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.8048064248
37.
KozbeltA.DexterS.DoleseM.MeredithD.OstrofskyJ. (2015). Regressive imagery in creative problem-solving: Comparing verbal protocols of expert and novice visual artists and computer programmers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(4), 263–278.doi:10.1002/jocb.64
38.
MartindaleC. (1975). Romantic progression: The psychology of literary history. HarperCollins.
39.
MartindaleC. (1990). The clockwork MUSE: The predictability of artistic change. Basic Books.
40.
MathieuC.St-JeanÉtienne.St-JeanÉ. (2013). Entrepreneurial personality: The role of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 527–531.doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.026
41.
McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C.KetchenD. J.PayneG. T.MossT. W. (2018). Strategic entrepreneurial orientation: Configurations, performance, and the effects of industry and time. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(4), 504–521.doi:10.1002/sej.1291
42.
McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C.PayneG. T. (2013). Using computer-aided text analysis to elevate constructs: An illustration using psychological capital. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 152–184.
43.
MillerD. (2015). A downside to the entrepreneurial personality?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 1–8.doi:10.1111/etap.12130
44.
MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.GaughanE. T.GentileB.MaplesJ.Keith CampbellW. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x21204843
MollickE. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
47.
NaidooL. J.LordR. G. (2008). Speech imagery and perceptions of charisma: The mediating role of positive affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 283–296.doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.010
48.
NavisC.OzbekO. (2016). The right people in the wrong places: The paradox of entrepreneurial entry and successful opportunity realization. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 109–129.doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0175
49.
ParhankangasA.RenkoM. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215–236.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001
50.
PatelP. C.CooperD. (2014). The harder they fall, the faster they rise: Approach and avoidance focus in narcissistic CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1528–1540.doi:10.1002/smj.2162
51.
PaulhusD. L.HarmsP. D.BruceM. N.LysyD. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 890–904.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.89012703655
52.
PetersonM.WiseK.RenY.WangZ.YaoJ. (2017). Memorable metaphor: How different elements of visual rhetoric affect resource allocation and memory for advertisements. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 38(1), 65–74.doi:10.1080/10641734.2016.1233155
53.
PettyR. E. (2018). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Routledge.
54.
PettyR. E.BrinolP. (2010). Attitude change: Advanced social psychology (pp.217–259). The state of the science.
55.
PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2008). Persuasion: From single to multiple to metacognitive processes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 137–147.doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00071.x26158880
56.
PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1–26.doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.96718325302943
57.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 722–741.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.72212003473
58.
PhelanJ. (1996). Narrative as rhetoric: Technique, audiences, ethics, ideology. Ohio State University Press.
59.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
60.
ReberR.WinkielmanP.SchwarzN. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48.doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.BichselJ.HoffmanK. (2002). The influence of accessibility of source likability on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 137–143.doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1492
63.
TuckerR. L.LowmanG. H.MarinoL. D. (2016). Dark Triad traits and the entrepreneurial process: A person-entrepreneurship perspective. InBuckleyM. R.HalbeslebenJ. R. B.WheelerA. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management. (Vol. 34, pp. 245–290). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
64.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.112417835457
65.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.doi:10.1126/science.7455683
66.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(S4), S251–278.doi:10.1086/296365
WhiteJ. B. (1985). Law as rhetoric, rhetoric as law: The arts of cultural and communal life. The University of Chicago Law Review, 52(3), 684–702.doi:10.2307/1599632
69.
WilsonA. (2010). The regressive imagery dictionary: A test of its concurrent validity in English, German, Latin, and Portuguese. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 26(1), 125–135.
70.
YoungL.SorokaS. (2012). Affective news: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts. Political Communication, 29(2), 205–231.doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.671234
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
