Regions with spatial concentrations of businesses create conditions that spawn new firms, but also undercut new venture survival. Localized competition puts pressure on new firms to exit. Adding to this pressure to exit is regional path dependence, which limits the ability of firms to respond strategically to hostile local conditions. We investigate the extent to which the pressure to exit created by localized competition is moderated by three “path breaking” factors—new knowledge, industry diversity, and industry switching. We test and find broad support for our hypotheses using data from 355 metropolitan statistical areas in the United States spanning 2002 to 2010.
AcsZ. J.AnselinL.VargaA. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069–1085.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
2.
AcsZ. J.AudretschD. B.FeldmanM. P. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 336–340.
3.
AgarwalR.EchambadiR.FrancoA. M.SarkarM. B. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 501–522.
4.
AnselinL.VargaA.AcsZ. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), 422–448.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2032
ArthurW. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. University of Michigan Press.
7.
AudretschD. B.KeilbachM. C.LehmannE. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press.
8.
BaumJ. A. C.MeziasS. J. (1992). Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 580–604.https://doi.org/10.2307/2393473
9.
BaumolW. J. (2002). The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton University Press.
10.
BeaudryC.SchiffauerovaA. (2009). Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, 38(2), 318–337.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
11.
BernardA. B.JensenJ. B.SchottP. K. (2006). Survival of the best fit: Exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of US manufacturing plants. Journal of International Economics, 68(1), 219–237.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.002
12.
BoschmaR. (2007). Path creation, path dependence and regional development. Path Dependence and the Evolution of City Regional Economies, Working Paper Series, 197(3), 40–55.
BrixyU.GrotzR. (2007). Regional patterns and determinants of birth and survival of new firms in Western Germany. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(4), 293–312.https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701275510
CardonM. S.ZietsmaC.SaparitoP.MatherneB. P.DavisC. (2005). A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 23–45.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.002
17.
CastaldiC.CimoliM.CorreaN.DosiG. (2004). Technological learning, policy regimes and growth in a “globalized” economy: General patterns and the Latin American experience. LEM Working Paper Series.
18.
DahlM. S.SorensonO. (2012). Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs' location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Science, 58(6), 1059–1071.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1476
19.
DeTienneD. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 203–215.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004
20.
DriscollJ. C.KraayA. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
21.
DurantonG.PugaD. (2001). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1454–1477.https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1454
22.
EggersJ. P.SongL. (2015). Dealing with failure: Serial entrepreneurs and the costs of changing industries between ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1785–1803.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0050
23.
FeldmanM. P.AudretschD. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409–429.
FujitaM.ThisseJ. -F. (2013). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and globalization. Cambridge University Press.
26.
GlaeserE. L.KallalH. D.ScheinkmanJ. A.ShleiferA. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.https://doi.org/10.1086/261856
27.
GlaeserE. L.MareD. C. (2001). Cities and skills. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 316–342.https://doi.org/10.1086/319563
28.
GrilichesZ. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w3301.pdfMA: w3301. Available at.
29.
HaltiwangerJ.pp. (2009). Entrepreneurship and job growth. InEntrepreneurship, economic growth, and public policy (pp.119–145). Cambridge University Press.
30.
HenningM.StamE.WentingR. (2013). Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation?Regional Studies, 47(8), 1348–1362.https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.750422
31.
HooverE. M.VernonR. (1959). Anatomy of a metropolis. The changing distribution of people and jobs within the New York Metropolitan Region. Harvard University Press.
32.
JohnsonP.ParkerS. (1996). Spatial variations in the determinants and effects of firm births and deaths. Regional Studies, 30(7), 679–688.https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409612331349968
33.
KennedyP. (2003). A guide to econometrics. MIT Press.
34.
KrugmanP. (1991). History and industry location: The case of the manufacturing belt. The American Economic Review, 81(2), 80–83.
35.
MartinR. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography—Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
36.
MartinR.SunleyP. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
37.
McCannB. T.FoltaT. B. (2008). Location matters: Where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 532–565.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316057
NeffkeF.HartogM.BoschmaR.HenningM. (2018). Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography, 94(1), 23–48.https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691
40.
NewmanC.RandJ.TarpF. (2012). Industry switching in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 27(2), 357–388.https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhs030
41.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
42.
NyströmK. (2007). An industry disaggregated analysis of the determinants of regional entry and exit. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(4), 877–896.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0130-x
43.
ParkerS. C. (2018). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press.
44.
Pe'erA.KeilT. (2013). Are all startups affected similarly by clusters? Agglomeration, competition, firm heterogeneity, and survival. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 354–372.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.004
45.
Pe'erA.VertinskyI.KeilT. (2016). Growth and survival: The moderating effects of local agglomeration and local market structure. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 541–564.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2331
46.
QianH.AcsZ. J. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 185–197.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9368-x
47.
RenskiH. (2008). New firm entry, survival, and growth in the United States: A comparison of urban, suburban, and rural areas. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), 60–77.https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802558424
48.
RenskiH. (2011). External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Papers in Regional Science, 90(3), 473–502.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00325.x
49.
RenskiH. (2014). The influence of industry mix on regional new firm formation in the United States. Regional Studies, 48(8), 1353–1370.https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.722202
50.
RosenthalS. S.StrangeW. C. (2003). Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 377–393.https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303765299882
51.
SorensonO.AudiaP. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–462.https://doi.org/10.1086/316962
52.
StaberU. (2005). Entrepreneurship as a source of path dependency. InRethinking regional innovation and change (pp.107–126). Springer.
53.
SydowJ.SchreyöggG.KochJ. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709.
WennbergK.DeTienneD. R. (2014). What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit’? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 4–16.https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613517126
56.
WennbergK.WiklundJ.DeTienneD. R.CardonM. S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 361–375.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.001
57.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Nelson Education.
58.
YamakawaY.CardonM. S. (2017). How prior investments of time, money, and employee hires influence time to exit a distressed venture, and the extent to which contingency planning helps. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.002
