We use a multiple case study approach to investigate “entrepreneurial leaps,” transition phases between dynamic states in which entrepreneurial action focused on reconfiguring key elements of the business model allows a firm to tap into new pools of resources through accessing and exploiting new market. Based on an analysis of 24 cases from three European countries, we derive a general process model of entrepreneurial leaps and identify four different patterns of how these transitions typically unfolds. The combination of dynamic states and entrepreneurial leaps can be used as a general framework for explaining nonlinear growth processes in firms.
AndersonP.MeyerA.EisenhardtK.CarleyK.PettigrewA. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Applications of complexity theory to organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.233
BerendsH.SmitsA.ReymenI.PodoynitsynaK. (2016). Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms. Strategic Organization, 14(3), 181–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016632758
5.
BrownR.MawsonS. (2013). Trigger points and high-growth firms: A conceptualisation and review of public policy implications. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(2), 279–295.
6.
BrownR.MawsonS.MasonC. (2017). Myth-busting and entrepreneurship policy: The case of high growth firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(5-6), 414–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1291762
7.
ClaussT. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385–403.
8.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
12.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E.SonensheinS. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4004
13.
FossN. J.SaebiT. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go?Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227.
GeorgeG.BockA. J. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00424.x
GersickC. J. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278988
18.
GreinerL. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 37–46.
19.
HacklinF.BjörkdahlJ.WallinM. W. (2018). Strategies for business model innovation: How firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.009
20.
HannahD. P.EisenhardtK. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2750
21.
HansenB.HamiltonR. T. (2011). Factors distinguishing small firm growers and non-growers. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 29(3), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610381846
22.
HarbermannH.SchuilteR. (2017). Analyzing non-linear dynamics of organic growth: Evidence from small German new ventures. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 27(2), 36–64.
23.
HjorthD.HoltR.SteyaertC. (2015). Entrepreneurship and process studies. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(6), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615583566
24.
HuberG. P.PowerD. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060206
25.
IngleyC.KhlifW.KarouiL. (2017). SME growth trajectories, transitions and board role portfolios: A critical review and integrative model. International Small Business Journal, 35(6), 729–750.
26.
JohnsonM. W.ChristensenC. M.KagermannH. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 57–68.
27.
JosephJ.WilsonA. J. (2018). The growth of the firm: An attention‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1779–1800. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2715
28.
KautonenT.van GelderenM.FinkM. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056
29.
KautonenT.van GelderenM.TornikoskiE. T. (2013). Predicting entrepreneurial behaviour: A test of the theory of planned behaviour. Applied Economics, 45(6), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.610750
30.
KruegerN. F.CarsrudA. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000020
31.
KruegerN. F.ReillyM. D.CarsrudA. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
32.
LevieJ.LichtensteinB. B. (2010). A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x
33.
LichtensteinB. B. (2016). Emergence and emergents in entrepreneurship: Complexity science insights into new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0052
34.
LichtensteinB. B. (2009). Moving from far-from-equilibrium: Opportunity tension as the catalyst of emergence. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 11(4), 15–25.
35.
LichtensteinB. B. (2014). Generative Emergence: A New Discipline of Organizational, Entrepreneurial, and Social Innovation. Oxford.
36.
LichtensteinB. B.CarterN. M.DooleyK. J.GartnerW. B. (2007). Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 236–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.001
37.
LichtensteinB. B.DooleyK. J.LumpkinG. T. (2006). Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.002
38.
McCarthyB. (2003). Strategy is personality‐driven, strategy is crisis‐driven: Insights from entrepreneurial firms. Management Decision, 41(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310468081
McKelveyB. (2016). Complexity ingredients required for entrepreneurial success. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2015-0053
41.
McKelvieA.WiklundJ. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00375.x
42.
McMullenJ. S.DimovD. (2013). Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 10(8), n/a–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12049
MitchellT. R.JamesL. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.5393889
PenroseE. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford.
47.
PhelpsR.AdamsR.BessantJ. (2007). Life cycles of growing organizations: A review with implications for knowledge and learning. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00200.x
48.
PlowmanD. A.BakerL. T.BeckT. E.KulkarniM.SolanskyS. T.TravisD. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525647
49.
PrigogineI. (1955). Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
50.
PrigogineI.StengersI. (1984). Order Out of Chaos. Bantam Books.
51.
RomanelliE.TushmanM. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141–1166.
52.
SaebiT.LienL.FossN. J. (2017). What drives business model adaptation? The impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.06.006
53.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
54.
ThompsonE. R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00321.x
55.
VinnellR.HamiltonR. T. (1999). A historical perspective on small firm development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300401
56.
VohoraA.WrightM.LockettA. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0
57.
WiklundJ.ShepherdD. (2003). Aspiring for, and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1919–1941. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00406.x
58.
YinR. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
ZupicI.GiudiciA. (2017). New venture growth: Current findings and future challenges. InBlackburnR.De ClercqD.HeinonenJ. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of small business and entrepreneurship (pp. 191–219). Sage.
