Using hand-collected data on top management team human capital (“top management quality”) of a large venture-backed private firm sample, we analyze the relation between top management team quality and pre-initial public offering (IPO) innovation productivity and the relation between pre-IPO innovation productivity and IPO market valuations. We hypothesize that firms with higher quality top management teams invest more in innovative projects and select better projects, yielding higher innovation productivity; pursue explorative rather than exploitative innovation strategies; and hire more high quality inventors. Finally, we hypothesize that IPO market rewards more innovative private firms with higher IPO firm valuations. The evidence supports these hypotheses.
AcharyaV.XuZ. (2017). Financial dependence and innovation: The case of public versus private firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), 223–243.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.02.010
2.
AdamsR. B.AlmeidaH.FerreiraD. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1403–1432.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhi030
3.
AggarwalV. A.HsuD. H. (2014). Entrepreneurial exits and innovation. Management Science, 60(4), 867–887.doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1801
4.
AghionP.TiroleJ. (1994). The management of innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 1185–1209.doi:10.2307/2118360
5.
AghionP.Van ReenenJ.ZingalesL. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1), 277–304.doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.277
6.
AmramM.KulatilakaN. (1999). Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Harvard Business School Press.
7.
AtanassovJ. (2013). Do hostile takeovers stifle innovation? Evidence from antitakeover legislation and corporate patenting. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 1097–1131.doi:10.1111/jofi.12019
8.
BalsmeierB.FlemingL.MansoG. (2017). Independent boards and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 536–557.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.12.005
9.
BaranchukN.KieschnickR.MoussawiR. (2014). Motivating innovation in newly public firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(3), 578–588.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.11.010
10.
BarkerV. L.MuellerG. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48, 782–801.
11.
BeckerG. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9–49.doi:10.1086/258724
12.
BernsteinS. (2015). Does going public affect innovation?The Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1365–1403.doi:10.1111/jofi.12275
13.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.doi:10.1162/003355303322552775
14.
BisharaN. D.MartinK. J.ThomasR. S. (2015). An empirical analysis of noncompetition clauses and other restrictive postemployment covenants. Vanderbilt Law Review, 68, 1–51.
15.
BorokhovichK. A.ParrinoR.TrapaniT. (1996). Outside directors and CEO selection. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 337–355.doi:10.2307/2331395
16.
BravA.JiangW.MaS.TianX. (2018). How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation?Journal of Financial Economics, 130(2), 237–264.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.012
17.
CaoJ.JiangF.RitterJ. (2015). Patents, innovation, and performance of venture capital-backed IPOs. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2364668
18.
ChangY. Y.DasguptaS.HilaryG. (2010). CEO ability, pay, and firm performance. Management Science, 56(10), 1633–1652.doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1205
19.
ChemmanurT. J.JiaoY. (2012). Dual class IPOs: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(1), 305–319.doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.07.010
20.
ChemmanurT. J.KongL.KrishnanK.YuQ. (2019). Top management human capital, inventor mobility, and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54(6), 2383–2422.doi:10.1017/S0022109018001497
21.
ChemmanurT. J.LoutskinaE.TianX. (2014). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434–2473.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhu033
22.
ChemmanurT. J.PaeglisI. (2005). Management quality, certification, and initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 331–368.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.001
23.
ChemmanurT. J.PaeglisI.SimonyanK. (2011). Management quality and antitakeover provisions. The Journal of Law and Economics, 54(3), 651–692.doi:10.1086/655805
24.
ChemmanurT. J.TianX. (2018). Do antitakeover provisions spur corporate innovation? A regression discontinuity analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(3), 1163–1194.doi:10.1017/S0022109018000029
25.
ColomboM. G.GrilliL. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010
26.
ColomboM. G.GrilliL. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610–626.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.005
27.
CotterJ. F.ShivdasaniA.ZennerM. (1997). Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers?Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 195–218.doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00886-0
28.
CustódioC.FerreiraM. A.MatosP. (2019). Do general managerial skills spur innovation?Management Science, 65(2), 459–476.doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2828
29.
D’AveniR. A. (1990). Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy. Organization Science, 1(2), 121–142.doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.121
30.
EdererF.MansoG. (2013). Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation?Management Science, 59(7), 1496–1513.doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1683
31.
EwensM.MarxM. (2018). Founder replacement and startup performance. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(4), 1532–1565.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhx130
32.
FaleyeO.HoitashR.HoitashU. (2011). The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 160–181.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.010
33.
FerreiraD.MansoG.SilvaA. C. (2014). Incentives to innovate and the decision to go public or private. Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 256–300.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs070
34.
GaoH.HsuP.-H.LiK. (2018). Innovation strategy of private firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(1), 1–32.doi:10.1017/S0022109017001119
35.
GarmaiseM. J. (2011). Ties that truly bind: Noncompetition agreements, executive compensation, and firm investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 27(2), 376–425.doi:10.1093/jleo/ewp033
36.
GaverJ. J.GaverK. M. (1993). Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1-3), 125–160.doi:10.1016/0165-4101(93)90007-3
37.
GimmonE.LevieJ. (2010). Founder's human capital, external investment, and the survival of new high-technology ventures. Research Policy, 39(9), 1214–1226.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.017
38.
GrilichesZ.PakesA.HallB. H. (1987). The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. InDasguptaP.StonemanP. (Eds.), Economic policy and technological performance. Cambridge University Press.
39.
GuayW. R. (1999). The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude and determinants. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 43–71.doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00016-1
40.
HallB. H.JaffeA. B.TrajtenbergM. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper. 8498No.
41.
HallB. H.JaffeA. B.TrajtenbergM. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 16–38.
42.
HambrickD. C.D'AveniR. A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38(10), 1445–1466.doi:10.1287/mnsc.38.10.1445
43.
HirshleiferD.LowA.TeohS. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators?The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457–1498.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01753.x
44.
KoganL.PapanikolaouD.SeruA.StoffmanN. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665–712.doi:10.1093/qje/qjw040
45.
KrugJ. A.ShillW. (2008). The big exit: executive churn in the wake of M&As. The Journal of Business Strategy, 29, 15–21.
46.
LernerJ.SorensenM.StrömbergP. E. R. (2011). Private equity and long-run investment: The case of innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(2), 445–477.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01639.x
47.
LernerJ.WulfJ. (2007). Innovation and incentives: evidence from corporate R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 634–644.
48.
LiG.-C.LaiR.D’AmourA.DoolinD. M.SunY.TorvikV. I.YuA. Z.FlemingL. (2014). Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Research Policy, 43(6), 941–955.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.012
49.
LoughranT.RitterJ. (2004). Why has IPO underpricing changed over time?Financial Management, 33, 5–37.
50.
MalsbergerB. M. (2004). Covenants not to compete: A state-by-state survey. BNA Books.
MarvelM. R.DavisJ. L.SproulC. R. (2016). Human capital and entrepreneurship research: A critical review and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 599–626.doi:10.1111/etap.12136
53.
MarvelM. R.LumpkinG. T. (2007). Technology entrepreneurs' human capital and its effects on innovation radicalness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 807–828.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00209.x
54.
MarxM.StrumskyD.FlemingL. (2009). Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Science, 55(6), 875–889.doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0985
55.
McGuirkH.LenihanH.HartM. (2015). Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ propensity to innovate. Research Policy, 44(4), 965–976.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.008
56.
PakesA. (1985). On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. The Journal of Political Economy, 93, 390–409.
57.
RechnerP. L.DaltonD. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160.doi:10.1002/smj.4250120206
58.
RitterJ. R.WelchI. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. The Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795–1828.doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00478
59.
SapraH.SubramanianA.SubramanianK. V. (2014). Corporate governance and innovation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(4), 957–1003.doi:10.1017/S002210901400060X
60.
SeruA. (2014). Firm boundaries matter: evidence from conglomerates and R&D activity. Journal of Financial Economics, 111, 381–405.
61.
SorensenJ. B.StuartT. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.doi:10.2307/2666980
62.
SpiegelM.TookesH. (2019). Why does an IPO affect rival firms?The Review of Financial Studies, 16.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz081
63.
SteinJ. (1989). Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 655–669.
64.
SteinJ. C. (1988). Takeover threats and managerial myopia. Journal of Political Economy, 96(1), 61–80.doi:10.1086/261524
65.
StockJ. H.WrightJ. H.YogoM. (2002). A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(4), 518–529.doi:10.1198/073500102288618658
66.
TianX.WangT. Y. (2014). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr130
67.
YermackD. (1997). Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 449–476.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04809.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
