Drawing on the transgenerational entrepreneurship perspective, we employ a multiple case study approach to investigate why multigenerational family firms innovate. The data collection process drew upon five in-depth cases comprising 42 semistructured interviews, 25 participant observations, and several thousand pages of historical data dating from 1916 to 2017. We find patterns on how the firms’ long-term view—embracing both the past and the future—influences the innovation motives of these firms. Specifically, we identify three innovation patterns: conserving, persisting and legacy-building. We introduce a set of propositions and a framework linking long-term orientation dimensions to innovation motives and innovation outcomes. Our research thus contributes to a more fine-grained understanding of innovation behavior in family firms.
AldrichH. E.RenzulliL.LangtonN. (1998) Passing on privilege: Resources provided by self-employed parents to their self-employed children. In: LeichtK. (ed.) Research in social stratification and mobilityVol. 16, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 291–318.
2.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003) Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S & P 500. The Journal of Finance58(3): 1301–1328.
3.
AndresC. (2011) Family ownership, financing constraints and investment decisions. Applied Financial Economics21(22): 1641–1659.
4.
ArmbrusterH.BikfalviA.KinkelS.LayG. (2008) Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation28(10): 644–657.
5.
ArregleJ.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007) The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies44(1): 73–95.
6.
AstrachanJ. H.JaskiewiczP. (2008) Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation. Family Business Review21(2): 139–149.
7.
BammensY.NotelaersG.Van GilsA. (2015) Implications of family business employment for employees’ innovative work involvement. Family Business Review28(2): 123–144.
8.
BarryB. (1989) Theories of justice, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
BergfeldM. M.WeberF. M. (2011) Dynasties of innovation: Highly performing German family firms and the owners’ role for innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management13(1): 80–94.
11.
BessantJ.LammingR.NokeH.PhillipsW. (2005) Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation25(12): 1366–1376.
12.
BlockJ. H. (2012) R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing27(2): 248–265.
13.
BlockJ. H.MillerD.JaskiewiczP.SpiegelF. (2013) Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review26(2): 180–199.
14.
BlundellR.GriffithsR.Van ReenenJ. (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies66(3): 529–554.
15.
BrighamK. H.LumpkinG. T.PayneG. T.ZacharyM. A. (2014) Researching long-term orientation: A validation study and recommendations for future research. Family Business Review27(1): 72–78.
16.
CarnesC. M.IrelandR. D. (2013) Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice37(6): 1399–1419.
17.
CarneyM. (2005) Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development29(3): 249–265.
18.
CassiaL.De MassisA.PizzurnoE. (2012) Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research18(2): 198–232.
19.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.De MassisA.FrattiniF.WrightM. (2015) The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management32(3): 310–318.
20.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012) Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal55(4): 976–997.
21.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SharmaP. (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Family Business Review23(4): 19–39.
22.
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (2003). Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16(2), 89–107.
23.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012) Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(6): 1103–1113.
24.
CraigJ. B.CassarG.MooresK. (2006) A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review19(1): 1–10.
25.
CraigJ. B.DibrellC. (2006) The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review19(4): 275–288.
26.
CraigJ. B.DibrellC.DavisP. S. (2008) Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management46(3): 351–371.
27.
CreswellJ. W. (2009) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28.
DamanpourF. (1991) Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal34(3): 555–590.
29.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.KotlarJ.PetruzzelliM. A.WrightM. (2016) Innovation through tradition. Academy of Management Perspectives30(1): 93–116.
30.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.LichtenthalerU. (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review26(1): 10–31.
31.
De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2014) The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy5(1): 15–29.
32.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2014) Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management52(2): 344–364.
33.
Drakopoulou DoddS.AndersonA.JackS. (2013) Being in time and the family owned firm. Scandinavian Journal of Management29(1): 35–47.
34.
DuranP.KammerlanderN.van EssenM.ZellwegerT. (2016) Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal59(4): 1–75.
35.
EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.ZellwegerT. M. (2012) Exploring entrepreneurial behaviour of family firms: Does the stewardship perspective explain difference?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(2): 347–367.
36.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
37.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal50(1): 25–32.
38.
FilserM.De MassisA.GastJ.KrausS.NiemandT. (2017) Tracing the roots of innovativeness in family SMEs: The effect of family functionality and socioemotional wealth. Journal of Product Innovation Management35(4): 609–628. doi:10.1111/jpim.12433.
39.
FoxM.TostL. P.Wade-BenzoniK. A. (2010) The legacy motive: A catalyst for sustainable decision making in organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly20(2): 153–185.
40.
GibbsG. R. (2002) Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
41.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-fuentesJ. (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly52(1): 106–137.
42.
GreveH. R. (2009) Bigger and safer: The diffusion of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal30(1): 1–23.
43.
HabbershonT. G.PistruiJ. (2002) Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review15(3): 223–237.
44.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM.MacMillanI. C. (2003) A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing18(4): 451–465.
45.
HandlerW. C. (1989) Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review2(3): 257–276.
46.
HofstedeG. (1980) Culture’s consequences: International differences in world-related values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
47.
HultG. T. M.HurleyR. F.KnightG. A. (2004) Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management33(5): 429–438.
48.
JamesH. S. (1999) Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business6(1): 41–55.
49.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.RauS. B. (2015) Journal of Business Venturing entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing30(1): 29–49.
50.
JohannessenJ. A.OlsenB.LumpkinG. T. (2001) Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom?European Journal of Innovation Management4(1): 20–31.
51.
KammerlanderN.DessiC.BirdM.FlorisM.MurruA. (2015) The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review28(4): 332–354.
52.
KammerlanderN.GanterM. (2015) An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: Exploring the role of family CEOs’ noneconomic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management32(3): 361–383.
53.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A. (2006) Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(6): 809–830.
54.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK. A.BarnettT.PearsonA. W. (2008) An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review21(1): 1–14.
55.
KellermannsF. W.EddlestonK.SarathyR.MurphyF. (2012) Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics38(1): 85–101.
56.
Kets de VriesM. (1993) Human dilemmas in family business, London: Routledge.
57.
KoenigA.KammerlanderN.EndersA. (2013) The family innovator’s Dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review38(3): 418–441.
58.
KotlarJ.De MassisA.FrattiniF.BianchiM.FangH. (2013) Technology acquisition in family and nonfamily firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management30(6): 1073–1088.
59.
KraiczyN. D.HackA.KellermannsF. W. (2014) New product portfolio performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research67(6): 1065–10730.
60.
LaforetS. (2013) Innovation characteristics of young and old family-owned businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development20(1): 204–224.
61.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2011) Commentary: Family firms and the advantage of multitemporality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(6): 1171–1177.
62.
LiZ.DaspitJ. J. (2016) Understanding family firm innovation heterogeneity: A typology of family governance and socioemotional wealth intentions. Journal of Family Business Management6(2): 103–121.
63.
LlachJ.NordqvistM. (2010) Innovation in family and non-family businesses: A resource perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing2(3–4): 381–399.
64.
LumpkinG. T.BrighamK. H.MossT. W. (2010) Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development22(3–4): 241–264.
65.
LumpkinG. T.BrighamK. H. (2011) Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(6): 1149–1169.
66.
LumpkinG. T.DessG. (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review21(1): 135–172.
67.
MatzlerK.VeiderV.HautzJ.StadlerC. (2015) The impact of family ownership, management and governance on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management32(3): 319–333.
68.
McCannJ. E.Leon-GuerreroA. Y.HaleyJ. D. (2001) Strategic goals and practices of innovative family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management39(1): 50–59.
69.
MerriamS. B. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70.
MilesM.HubermanM. (1994) Qualitative data analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
71.
MillerD.FriesenP. H. (1982) Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal3(1): 1–25.
72.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005) Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
73.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H.CannellaA. A. (2007) Are family firms really superior performers?Journal of Corporate Finance13(5): 829–858.
74.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.ScholnickB. (2008) Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies45(1): 51–78.
75.
NaldiL.NordqvistM.SjöbergK.WiklundJ. (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review20(1): 33–48.
76.
NohriaN.GulatiR. (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation. Academy of Management Journal39(5): 1245–1264.
77.
NordqvistM.HabbershonT. G.MelinL. (2008) Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring EO in family firms. In: LandströmH.CrijnsH.LaverenE. (eds) Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research, Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 93–116.
78.
NordqvistM.HallA.MelinL. (2009) Qualitative research in family business studies: The usefulness of the interpretive approach. Journal of Management & Organization15(3): 294–308.
79.
NordqvistM.ZellwegerT. (2010) Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring growth and performance in family firms across generations, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
80.
ReayT. (2014) Publishing qualitative research. Family Business Review27(2): 95–102.
81.
RodI. (2016) Disentangling the family firm’s innovation process: A systematic review. Journal of Family Business Strategy7(3): 185–201.
82.
SchumpeterJ. (1934) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
83.
SharmaP.SalvatoC.ReayT. (2014) Temporal dimensions of family enterprise research. Family Business Review27(1): 10–19.
84.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003) Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice27(4): 339–358.
85.
SlevinD. P.CovinJ. G. (1995) Entrepreneurship as firm behavior: A research model. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth2: 175–224.
86.
SubramaniamM.YoundtM. A. (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types on innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal48(3): 450–463.
87.
ThompsonV. A. (1965) Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly10(1): 1–20.
88.
TiddJ.BessantJ.PavittK. (2005) Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (, 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
89.
TsaiK.-H.YangS.-Y. (2012) The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal10(2): 343–366.
90.
Van GilsA.DibrellC.NeubaumD. O.CraigJ. B. (2014) Social issues in the family enterprise. Family Business Review27(3): 193–205.
91.
VenkatramanN. (1989) Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science35(8): 942–962.
92.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2010) Family control of firms and industries. Financial Management39(3): 863–904.
93.
Wade-BenzoniK. A. (2002) A golden rule over time: Reciprocity in intergenerational allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal45(5): 1011–1028.
94.
Wade-BenzoniK. A.SondakH.GalinskyA. (2010) Leaving a legacy: Intergenerational allocations of benefits and burdens. Business Ethics Quarterly20(1): 7–34.
95.
WardJ. L. (2004) Perpetuating the family business: 50 lessons learned from long-lasting, successful families in business, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
96.
WeberR. P. (1990) Basic content analysis, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
97.
WeerawardenaJ. (2003) Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy. European Journal of Marketing37(3): 4, 407–429.
98.
WeissE. B. (1989) In fairness to future generations: International law, common patrimony, and intergenerational equity, New York, NY: Transnational Publishers.
99.
WiklundJ.ShepherdD. (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing20(1): 71–91.
100.
YinR. K. (2003) Applications of case study research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
101.
YinR. K. (2009) Case study research: Design and methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
102.
ZahraS.CovinJ. (1995) Contextual influence on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing10(1): 43–58.
103.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.SalvatoC. (2004) Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(4): 363–381.
104.
ZahraS. A. (2003) International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing18(4): 495–512.
105.
ZellwegerT. M. (2007) Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review20(1): 1–15.
106.
ZellwegerT. M.EddlestonK.KellermannsF. W. (2010) Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy1(1): 54–63.
107.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S.NordqvistM. (2011) From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review25(2): 136–155.
108.
ZellwegerT. M.SiegerP. (2012) Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms. Small Business Economics38(1): 67–84.
