This article is about the network theory of advantage applied to entrepreneurship and an area-probability sample of 700 Chinese entrepreneurs, using 2,193 American and European managers as a baseline comparison group. The article deals with how certain entrepreneurs are disadvantaged by their networks, the contrasting forms that disadvantage takes in China and the West, the role of family in the Chinese networks, and ultimately the robustness of network theory to the cultural, structural, and content variations discussed.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing18(5): 573–596. 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
AndersonA. R.JackS. L.DoddS. D. (2005). The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review18(2): 135–154. 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00037.x
4.
ArregleJ. L.BatjargalB.HittM. A.WebbJ. W.MillerT.TsuiA. S. (2013). Family ties in entrepreneurs’ social networks and new venture growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(2): 313–344. 10.1111/etap.12044
5.
BarkerJ. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 408–437. 10.2307/2393374
6.
BatjargalB. (2007a). Comparative social capital: Networks of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in China and Russia. Management and Organization Review3(3): 397–419. 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2007.00080.x
7.
BatjargalB. (2007b). Internet entrepreneurship: Social capital, human capital, and performance of internet ventures in China. Research Policy36(5): 605–618. 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.029
8.
BatjargalB. (2010). The effects of network’s structural holes: Polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal4(2): 146–163. 10.1002/sej.88
9.
BatjargalB.HittM. A.TsuiA. S.ArregleJ. -L.WebbJ. W.MillerT. L. (2013). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneur’s social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal56(4): 1024–1049. 10.5465/amj.2010.0095
BianY.IkedaK. (2014). East Asian social networks. In: AlhajjR.RokneJ. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 417–433.
12.
BianY.LiL. (2012). The Chinese General Social Survey (2003-8). Chinese Sociological Review45(1): 70–97. 10.2753/CSA2162-0555450104
13.
BianY.WangW. (2016). The social capital for self-employment in transitional China. In: WangJ. H.HsungR. M. (eds) Rethinking social capital and entrepreneurship in Greater China, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 21–35.
14.
BirleyS. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing1(1): 245–260. 10.1016/0883-9026(85)90010-2
15.
BorgattiS. P. (2002). NetDraw, Boston, MA: Analytic Technologies.
16.
BrüderlJ.PreisendörferP. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics10(3): 213–225. 10.1023/A:1007997102930
17.
BrutonG. D.ZahraS. A.CaiL. (2018). Examining entrepreneurship through indigenous lenses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice42(3): 351–361. 10.1177/1042258717741129
18.
BurtR. S. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action, New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
BurtR. S. (1987). A note on the general social survey’s ersatz network density item. Social Networks9(1): 75–85. 10.1016/0378-8733(87)90019-0
20.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
BurtR. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology110(2): 349–399. 10.1086/421787
22.
BurtR. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
23.
BurtR. S. (2010). Neighbor networks, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
24.
BurtR. S. (2012). Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. American Journal of Sociology118(3): 543–591. 10.1086/667856
25.
BurtR. S. (2015). Reinforced structural holes. Social Networks43(4): 149–161. 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.04.008
26.
BurtR. S. (2017). Social network and temporal discounting. Network Science5(4): 411–440. 10.1017/nws.2017.23
27.
BurtR. S.BurzynskaK. (2017). Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and guanxi. Management and Organization Review13(2): 221–260. 10.1017/mor.2017.6
28.
BurtR. S.HogarthR. M.MichaudC. (2000). The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science11(2): 123–147. 10.1287/orsc.11.2.123.12506
29.
BurtR. S.KilduffM.TasselliS. (2013). Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on network advantage. Annual Review of Psychology64: 527–547. 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143828
30.
BurtR. S.MerluzziJ. (2014). Embedded brokerage: Hubs versus locals. In: BrassD. J.LabiancaG.MehraA.HalginD. S.BorgattiS. P. (eds) Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks, Bingley: Emerald, pp. 161–177.
31.
BurtR. S.OpperS. (2017). Early network events in the later success of Chinese entrepreneurs. Management and Organization Review13(3): 497–537. 10.1017/mor.2017.30
32.
BurtR. S.SodaG. (2017). Social origins of great strategies. Strategy Science2(4): 226–233.
33.
BygraveW. D.HoferC. W. (1992). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice16(2): 13–22. 10.1177/104225879201600203
34.
CarnabuciG.QuintaneE. (2018). “Does bridging structural holes increase innovative performance? Evidence from a field experiment” Paper presented at 8th Intra-Organizational Networks Conference, University of Kentucky Links Center, Lexington, KY.
35.
CliffJ. E.LangtonN.AldrichH. E. (2005). Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms. Organization Studies26(1): 63–91. 10.1177/0170840605046490
36.
CookK. S.EmersonR. M.GilmoreM. R.YamagishiT. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology89(2): 275–305. 10.1086/227866
37.
CringelyR.X. (2012). Steve jobs: The lost interview, New York, NY: Magnolia Pictures.
38.
DavidssonP.HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331. 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6
39.
de VaanM.StarkD.VedresB. (2015). Game changer: the topology of creativity. American Journal of Sociology120(4): 1144–1194. 10.1086/681213
40.
DiTomasoN.BianY. (2018). The structure of labor markets in the US and China: Social capital and guanxi. Management and Organization Review14(1): 5–36. 10.1017/mor.2017.63
41.
DomurathA.PatzeltH. (2016). Entrepreneurs’ assessments of early international entry: The role of foreign social ties, venture absorptive capacity, and generalized trust in others. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice40(5): 1149–1177. 10.1111/etap.12164
42.
EvertonS. FKangS. MThorntonP. H. (2013) Academy of Management annual meetings, Orlando, FL.
43.
FestingerL.SchachterS.BackK. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups, Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
44.
FlemingL.MarxM. (2006). Managing creativity in small worlds. California Management Review48(4): 6–27. 10.2307/41166358
FreemanL. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry40(1): 35–40. 10.2307/3033543
47.
GoldbergA.SrivastavaS. B.ManianV. G.MonroeW.PottsC. (2016). Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. American Sociological Review81(6): 1190–1222. 10.1177/0003122416671873
48.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380. 10.1086/225469
49.
GreveA.SalaffJ. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(1): 7–22. 10.1111/1540-8520.00029
50.
HansenE. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice19(4): 7–19. 10.1177/104225879501900402
51.
HayekF. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica4(13): 33–54. 10.2307/2548786
52.
HayekF. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American economic review35(4): 519–530.
53.
HechavarríaD. M.TerjesenS. A.StenholmP.BrännbackM.LångS. (2018). More than words: Do gendered linguistic structures widen the gender gap in entrepreneurial activity?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice42(5): 797–817. 10.1177/1042258718795350
54.
HiteJ. M.HesterlyW. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal22(3): 275–286.
55.
HoangH.AntoncicB. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 165–187.
56.
JackS. L. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing25(1): 120–137. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.010
57.
JangS. (2018). Cultural brokerage and creative performance in multicultural teams. Organization Science29(6): 993–1009.
58.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. F. (1955). Personal influence, New York, NY: Free Press.
59.
KhayesiJ. N. O.GeorgeG.AntonakisJ. (2014). Kinship in entrepreneur’s networks: Performance effects of resource assembling in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(6): 1323–1342. 10.1111/etap.12127
60.
KotterJ. P. (1990). What leaders really do. Harvard business review68(3): 103–111.
61.
KreiserP. M.PatelP. C.FietJ. O. (2013). The influence of changes in social capital on firm-founding activities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(3): 539–567. 10.1111/etap.12039
62.
LamineW.JackS.FayolleA.ChabaudD. (2015). One step beyond? Towards a process view of social networks in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development27(7–8): 413–429. 10.1080/08985626.2015.1070535
63.
LeavittH. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology46(1): 38–50. 10.1037/h0057189
64.
LeeY.GargiuloM. (2018). “Agency and structure: career trajectories of songwriters inKorean pop music” Presented at the Intra-Organizational Networks Conference, University of Kentucky Links Center, Lexington, KY.
65.
LinN. (2002). Social capital, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
LinN.EnselW. M.VaughnJ. C. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review46(4): 393–405. 10.2307/2095260
67.
LingoE. L.O’MahonyS. (2010). Nexus work: Brokerage on certain creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly55(1): 47–81. 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.47
68.
MarchJ. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science2(1): 71–87. 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
69.
MarsdenP.V. (2011). Survey methods for network data. In: ScottJ. P.CarringtonP. J. (eds) The Sage handbook of social network analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 370–388).
70.
MerluzziJ. (2013). Social capital in Asia: Investigating returns to brokerage in collectivistic national cultures. Social Science Research42(3): 882–892. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.002
71.
MorseE. A.FowlerS. W.LawrenceT. B. (2007). The impact of virtual embeddedness on new venture survival: Overcoming the liabilities of newness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(2): 139–159. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00167.x
72.
NeeV.OpperS. (2012). Capitalism from below, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
OpperS.BurtR. S.HolmH. J. (2017). Social network and cooperation with strangers (Working paper, Lund: Department of Economics, Lund University.
74.
OpperS.NeeV.HolmH. J. (2017). Risk aversion and guanxi activities: A behavioral analysis of CEOs in China. Academy of Management Journal60(4): 1504–1530. 10.5465/amj.2015.0355
75.
PengY. (2004). Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology109(5): 1045–1074. 10.1086/382347
76.
PerryB. L.PescosolidoB. A.BorgattiS. P. (2018). Egocentric network analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
Perry-SmithJ. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal49(1): 85–101. 10.5465/amj.2006.20785503
78.
Perry-SmithJ. E.MannucciP.V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review42(1): 53–79. 10.5465/amr.2014.0462
79.
RahmanH. A.BarleyS. R. (2017). Situated Redesign in creative occupations: An ethnography of architects. Academy of Management Discoveries3(4): 404–424. 10.5465/amd.2016.0039
80.
RazO.GloorP. A. (2007). Size Really matters: New insights for start-ups’ survival. Management Science53(2): 169–177. 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0609
81.
RiderC.I. (2009). Constraints on the control benefits of brokerage: A study of placement agents in U.S. Venture capital fundraising. Administrative Science Quarterly54(4): 575–601. 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.4.575
82.
RuanD. (1998). The content of the General Social Survey discussion networks: an exploration of General Social Survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context. Social Networks20(3): 247–264. 10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00004-5
83.
SalganikM. J.DoddsP. S.WattsD. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial culture market. Science31(5762): 854–856.
84.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1911). The theory of economic development (R. Opie, Trans), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
SemrauT.WernerA. (2014). How exactly do network relationships pay off? The effects of network size and relationship quality on access to start-up resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(3): 501–525. 10.1111/etap.12011
86.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review17(1): 1–36. 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x
87.
SmithE. B.MenonT.ThompsonL. (2012). Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organization Science23(1): 67–82. 10.1287/orsc.1100.0643
88.
SodaG.MannucciP.VBurtR. S. (2018). Structural holes, new ties, and individual creativity (Working paper), Milan: Bocconi University.
89.
SodaG.TortorielloM.IorioA. (2018). Harvesting value from brokerage: Individual strategic orientation, structural holes, and performance. Academy of Management Journal61(3): 896–918. 10.5465/amj.2016.0123
90.
SorensonO. (2017). Entrepreneurs and social capital in China. Management and Organization Review13(2): 275–280. 10.1017/mor.2017.21
91.
SorensonO.StuartT. E. (2008). 12 Entrepreneurship: A field of dreams?Academy of Management Annals2(1): 517–543. 10.5465/19416520802211669
92.
StuartT. E.SorensonO. (2005). Social networks and entrepreneurship. In: AgarwalR.AlvarezS.SorensonO. (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research: Disciplinary perspectives, Berlin: Springer, pp. 211–228.
UzziB.SpiroJ. (2005). Collaboration and Creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology111(2): 447–504. 10.1086/432782
95.
von HippelE. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science40(4): 429–439. 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
96.
WatsonJ. (2007). Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing22(6): 852–874. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.08.001
97.
WuchtyS.UzziB. (2011). Human communication dynamics in digital footsteps: A study of the agreement between self-reported ties and email networks. Plos One6(11), e26972. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026972
98.
XiaoZ.TsuiA. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly52(1): 1–31. 10.2189/asqu.52.1.1
99.
YooM. (2003). The ties that (Un)bind: Social networks and entrepreneurship in high technology industries (Doctoral dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: Sociology and Business Administration, University of Michigan.
100.
ZhaoC.BurtR. S. (2018). A note on business survival and social network. Management and Organization Review14(2): 377–394. 10.1017/mor.2018.12
