This article develops a theoretical framework for analyzing the role of kinship in entrepreneurship. Kinship, we argue, is a key ingredient of the social and cultural environment of entrepreneurs, and, therefore, essential in understanding how and why entrepreneurship happens. Building on qualitative research conducted among Cambodian Chinese entrepreneurs in Phnom Penh, we define kinship as interpersonal ties grounded in relatedness. We distinguish different categories of kinship ties that involve different levels of relatedness and are used for different aspects of entrepreneurship, and we identify different types of reciprocity and trust as the sociocultural dynamics that buttress kinship involvement in entrepreneurship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkhterN. (2015). Kinship and the family business. In NordqvistM., MelinL., WaldkirchM., & KumetoG. (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on family businesses (pp. 175–190). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
2.
AldrichH.E. & WaldingerR. (1990). Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 111–135.
3.
AlsosG.A., CarterS., & LjunggrenE. (2014). Kinship and business: How entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 26(1–2), 97–122.
4.
AndersonA.R. (2000). Paradox in the periphery: An entrepreneurial reconstruction?Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 12(2), 91–109.
5.
AndersonA.R., JackS.L., & Drakopoulou DoddD.S. (2005). The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review, 18(2), 135–154.
6.
BakerT. & NelsonR.E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366.
7.
BansalP. & CorleyK. (2011). The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233–237.
8.
BettisR.A., GambardellaA., HelfatC., & MitchellW. (2015). Qualitative empirical research in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 36(5), 637–639.
9.
CarstenJ. (2000). Introduction: Cultures of relatedness. In CarstenJ. (Ed.), Cultures of relatedness: New approaches to the study of kinship (pp. 1–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CarstenJ. (2004). Introduction: After kinship? In CarstenJ. (Ed.), After kinship (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CarstenJ. (2013). What kinship does—and how. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 245–251.
12.
CarterS. & RamM. (2003). Reassessing portfolio entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 371–380.
13.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & SteierL.P. (2002). The influence of national culture and family involvement on entrepreneurial perceptions and performance at the state level. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 113–130.
14.
CourpassonD., DanyF., & MartíI. (2016). Organizational entrepreneurship as active resistance: A struggle against outsourcing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 131–160.
15.
CruzC., JustoR., & De CastroJ.O. (2012). Does family employment enhance MSEs performance? Integrating socioemotional wealth and family embeddedness perspectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 62–76.
16.
DanesS.M., LeeJ., StaffordK., & HeckR.K.Z. (2008). The effects of ethnicity, families and culture on entrepreneurial experience: An extension of sustainable family business theory. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 229–268.
17.
DavidssonP. & WiklundJ. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81–100.
18.
Discua CruzA., HoworthC., & HamiltonE. (2013). Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1), 17–46.
19.
DoussetL. (2013). From consanguinity to consubstantiality: Julian Pitt–Rivers’ “the Kith and the Kin.” Structure and Dynamics, 6(1), 1–13.
20.
EddlestonK.A., ChrismanJ.J., SteierL.P., & ChuaJ.H. (2010). Governance and trust in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1043–1056.
21.
EdwardsP. (2012). Endnote—Sojourns across sources: Unbraiding Sino–Cambodian histories. Cross–Currents: East Asia East Asian History and Culture Review, 1(2), 398–418.
EriksenT.H. (2015). Small places, large issues: An introduction to social and cultural anthropology (4th ed.). London: Pluto Press.
24.
FletcherD.E. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 18(5), 421–440.
25.
FortesM. (1969). Kinship and the axiom of amity. In FortesM. (Ed.), Kinship and the social order (pp. 219–249). Chicago: Aldine.
26.
GamsonJ. (2015). Modern families: Stories of extraordinary journeys to kinship. New York: NYU Press.
27.
GartnerW.B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.
28.
GioiaD.A., CorleyK.G., & HamiltonA.L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
29.
GottesmanE. (2003). Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge: Inside the politics of nation building. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
HarrisI.C. (2009). Ethnicity effects on the family business entrepreneurial process: Commentary and extension. Family Business Review, 22(3), 293–296.
31.
IyerG.R. (2004). Ethnic business families. International Research in the Business Disciplines, 4, 243–260.
32.
Janjuha–JivrajS. & SpenceL.J. (2009). The nature of reciprocity in family firm succession. International Small Business Journal, 27, 702–719.
33.
JohannissonB. (2011). Towards a practice theory of entrepreneuring. Small Business Economics, 36(2), 135–150.
34.
KarraN., TraceyP., & PhillipsN. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861–877.
35.
KeesingR.M. (1990). Kinship, bonding, and categorization. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 1(2), 159–167.
36.
KhavulS., BrutonG.D., & WoodE. (2009). Informal family business in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1219–1238.
37.
KhayesiJ.N.O., GeorgeG., & AntonakisJ. (2014). Kinship in entrepreneur networks: Performance effects of resource assembly in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1323–1342.
38.
KoningJ. & VerverM. (2013). Historicizing the “ethnic” in ethnic entrepreneurship: The case of the ethnic Chinese in Bangkok. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 25(5–6), 325–348.
39.
LeanaC.R. & Van BurenH.J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538–555.
40.
LockeK. (2011). Field research practice in management and organization studies: Reclaiming its tradition of discovery. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 613–652.
41.
MilesM.B. & HubermanA.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MorozP.W. & HindleK. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonizing multiple perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 781–818.
43.
MorrisM.L. & KellermannsF.W. (2013). Family relations and family businesses: A note from the guest editors. Family Relations, 62(3), 379–383.
44.
MullerG. (2006). Colonial Cambodia's “bad Frenchmen”: The rise of French rule and the life of Thomas Caraman. London: Routledge.
45.
NagR. & GioiaD.A. (2012). From common to uncommon knowledge: Foundations of firm–specific use of knowledge as a resource. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 421–457.
46.
NordqvistM., HallA., & MelinL. (2009). Qualitative research on family businesses: The relevance and usefulness of the interpretive approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 294–308.
47.
OnwuegbuzieA.J. & LeechN.L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality & Quantity, 41(1), 105–121.
48.
PeletzM.G. (2001). Ambivalence in kinship since the 1940s. In FranklinS. & McKinnonS. (Eds.), Relative values: Refiguring kinship studies (pp. 413–444). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
49.
PengY. (2004). Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China's transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1045–1074.
50.
PeredoA.M. (2003). Nothing thicker than blood? Commentary on “help one another, use one another”: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 397–400.
51.
RamM., AbbasT., SangheraB., BarlowG., & JonesT. (2001). Making the link: Households and small business activity in a multi–ethnic context. Community, Work & Family, 4(3), 327–348.
52.
RandersonK., BettinelliC., FayolleA., & AndersonA. (2015). Family entrepreneurship as a field of research: Exploring its contours and contents. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(3), 143–154.
53.
RauchA., Van DoornR., & HulsinkW. (2014). A qualitative approach to evidence–based entrepreneurship: Theoretical considerations and an example involving business clusters. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 333–368.
54.
SahlinsM. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine–Atherton.
55.
SahlinsM. (2011a). What kinship is (part one). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17, 2–19.
56.
SahlinsM. (2011b). What kinship is (part two). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17, 227–242.
57.
Schwartz–SheaP. & YanowD. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York: Routledge.
58.
ShaneS. & VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
59.
SteierL. & MuethelM. (2014). Trust and family businesses. In MelinL., NordqvistM., & SharmaP. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of family business (pp. 498–513). London: Sage.
60.
StewartA. (2003). Help one another, use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 383–396.
61.
StewartA. (2008). Who could best complement a team of family business researchers–scholars down the hall or in another building?Family Business Review, 21(4), 279–293.
62.
StewartA. (2010a). Sources of entrepreneurial discretion in kinship systems. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 12, 291–313.
63.
StewartA. (2010b). Skeptical about family business: Advancing the field in its scholarship, relevance, and academic role. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 12, 231–241.
64.
StewartA. (2014). The anthropology of family business: An imagined ideal. In MelinL., NordqvistM., & SharmaP. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of family business (pp. 66–82). Los Angeles: Sage.
65.
StewartA. & HittM.A. (2010). The yin and yang of kinship and business: Complementary or contradictory forces? (And can we really say?). Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 12, 243–276.
66.
StewartA. & HittM.A. (2012). Why can't a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58–86.
67.
StewartA. & MinerA.S. (2011). The prospects for family business in research universities. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(1), 3–14.
68.
StewartA., LumpkinG.T., & KatzJ.A. (2010). An introduction to the special volume on family business and entrepreneurship. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 12, xiii–xxxv.
69.
StortiL. (2014). Being an entrepreneur: Emergence and structuring of two immigrant entrepreneur groups. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 26(7–8), 521–545.
70.
TanJ., YangJ., & VeliyathR. (2009). Particularistic and system trust among small and medium enterprises: A comparative study in China's transition economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 544–557.
71.
VerverM. (2012). Templates of “Chineseness” and trajectories of Cambodian Chinese entrepreneurship in Phnom Penh. Cross–Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review, 1(2), 23–51.
72.
Wade–BenzoniK.A. (2002). A golden rule over time: Reciprocity in intergenerational allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1011–1028.
73.
WatsonT.J. (2013). Entrepreneurship in action: Bringing together the individual, organizational and institutional dimensions of entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 25(5–6), 404–422.
74.
WelterF. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship: Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.
75.
WelterF. (2012). All you need is trust? A critical review of the trust and entrepreneurship literature. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 193–212.
76.
WelterF. & SmallboneD. (2006). Exploring the role of trust in entrepreneurial activity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 465–475.
77.
WillmottW.E. (1967). The Chinese in Cambodia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
78.
ZellwegerT.M., NasonR.S., & NordqvistM. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25(2), 136–155.
