Leadership succession continues to form the core of the family business literature. Numerous studies have suggested factors that influence family members' initial satisfaction with the succession process, but this body of work is highly fragmented and lacks a unifying framework. In this paper, we draw on stakeholder theory and other organizational, behavioral, and economic theories to develop a conceptual model that integrates the findings from the literature. The research and practical implications of this integrative, ready-to-test, model are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlchianA. A., & DemsetzH. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization.American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.
2.
AmbroseD. M. (1983). Transfer of the family-owned business.Journal of Small Business Management, Jan., 49–56.
CarterN. M., GartnerW. B., & ReynoldsP. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences.Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 151–166.
11.
ChrismanJ. J., ChuaJ. H., & SharmaP. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study.Family Business Review, 11(1), 19–34.
12.
ChristensenC. (1953). Management succession in small and growing enterprises.Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
13.
ChuaJ. H., ChrismanJ. J., & SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19–39.
14.
DancoL. (1975). Beyond survival: A business owner's guide for success.Cleveland, OH: University for Family Business University Press.
15.
DavisJ. A. (1982). The influence of life-stage on father-son work relationship in family companies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School.
16.
DeanS. M. (1992). Characteristics of African American family-owned businesses in Los Angeles.Family Business Review, 5(4), 373–395.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL. G. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications.Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
19.
DunnB. (1995). Success themes in Scottish family enterprises: Philosophies and practices through the generations.Family Business Review, 8(1), 17–28.
20.
DyerW. G.Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
DyerW. G.Jr., & SanchezM. (1998). Current state of family business theory and practice as reflected in the Family Business Review 1988–1997.Family Business Review, 11(4), 287–295.
22.
FileK. M., PrinceR. A., & RankinM. J. (1994). Organizational buying behavior of the family firm.Family Business Review, 7(3), 263–272.
23.
FirnstahlT. W. (1986). Letting go.Harvard Business Review, 64(5), 14–18.
24.
FreemanE. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach.Boston: Pitman.
25.
GoldbergS. D. (1996). Research note: Effective successors in family-owned businesses: Significant elements.Family Business Review, 9(2), 185–197.
26.
GoldbergS. D., & WoolridgeB. (1993). Self-confidence and managerial autonomy: Successor characteristics critical to succession in family firms.Family Business Review, 6(1), 55–73.
27.
GordonG. W., & RosenN. A. (1981). Critical factors in leadership succession.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 227–254.
28.
HandlerW. C. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next generation family member's experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Management, Boston University.
29.
HandlerW. C. (1992). The succession experience of the next generation.Family Business Review, 5(3), 283–307.
30.
HandlerW. C., & KramK. E. (1988). Succession in family firms: The problem of resistance.Family Business Review, 1(4), 361–381.
31.
HarvestonP. D., DavisP. S., & LydenJ. A. (1997). Succession planning in family business: The impact of owner gender.Family Business Review, 10(4), 373–396.
32.
HarveyM., & EvansR. E. (1995). Life after succession in the family business: Is it really the end of problems?Family Business Review, 8(1), 3–16.
33.
HayesJ. T., & AdamsR. M. (1990). Taxation and statutory considerations in the formation of family foundations.Family Business Review, 3(4), 383–394.
34.
HoferC. W., & CharanR. (1984). The transition to professional management: Mission impossible?American Journal of Small Business, 9(1), 1–11.
35.
JemisonD. B., & SitkinS. B. (1986). Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective.Academy of Management Review, 11, 145–163.
36.
JensenM. C., & MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
37.
JonesT. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics.Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.
38.
KanterR. (1989). Work and family in US: A critical review and agenda for research and policy.Family Business Review, 2(1), Spring, 77–114.
39.
KepnerE. (1983). The family and the firm: A co-evolutionary perspective.Organizational Dynamics, Summer, 57–70.
40.
KesnerI. F., & SeboraT. C. (1994). Executive succession: Past, present and future.Journal of Management, 20(2), 337–372.
41.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1985). The dark side of entrepreneurship.Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec., 160–167.
42.
Kets de VriesM. F. R. (1988). The dark side of CEO succession.Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., 56–80.
43.
KohlerT., & StraussG. (1983). Executive succession: Literature review and research issues.Administration in Mental Health, 11, 11–22.
44.
LansbergI. (1988). The succession conspiracy.Family Business Review, 1(2), 119–143.
45.
LansbergI. (1999). Succeeding generations: Realizing the dreams of families in business.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
46.
LansbergI., & AstrachanJ. H. (1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors.Family Business Review, 7(1), 39–59.
47.
LansbergI., PerrowE., & RogolskyS. (1988). Family business as an emerging field.Family Business Review, 1, 1–8.
48.
LundbergC. C. (1994). Unraveling communications among family members.Family Business Review, 7(1), 29–37.
49.
MaloneS. C. (1989). Selected correlates of business continuity planning in the family business.Family Business Review, 2(4), 341–353.
50.
MarchJ. G., & SimonH. (1958). Organizations.New York: John Wiley.
51.
Mass Mutual Survey. (1994). A telephone survey of 1002 family business owners. Prepared by Mathew Greenwald and Associates, for Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company.
52.
MitchellR. K., AgleB. R., & WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
53.
MorrisM. H., WilliamsR. O., AllenJ. A., & AvilaR. A. (1997). Correlates of success in family business transitions.Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 385–401.
54.
OrganD. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior.Research in Organization Behavior, 12, 43–72.
55.
PitcherP., ChreimS., & KisfalviV. (2000). CEO succession research: Methodological bridges over troubled waters.Strategic Management Journal, 21, 625–648.
56.
PorterL. W., & LawlorE. E.III (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance.Homeward IL: The Dorsey Press and Richard D. Irwin Inc.
57.
PozaE. J., AlfredT., & MaheshwariA. (1997). Stakeholders perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms—A preliminary report.Family Business Review, 10(2), 135–155.
58.
RosenbergC. F. (1991), Entrepreneurial couples: Organizational, marital and spouse/personal factors that influence the quality of their working relationship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Temple University.
59.
RosenblattP. C., deMikL., AndersonR. M., & JohnsonP. A. (1985). The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenges entrepreneurial families face.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60.
RubensonG. C., & GuptaA. K. (1992). Replacing the founder: Exploring the myth of the entrepreneur's disease.Business Horizons, November-December, 53–57.
61.
ShankerM. C., & AstrachanJ. H. (1996). Myths and realities: Family businesses' contribution to the US economy.Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123.
62.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ. J., & ChuaJ. H. (1996). A review and annotated bibliography of family business studies.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ. J., & ChuaJ. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges.Family Business Review, 10(1), 1–35.
64.
ShleiferA., & VisnyR. (1997). A survey of corporate governance.The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
65.
SonnenfeldJ., (1986). Heroes in collision: Chief executive retirement and the parade of future leaders.Human Resource Management, 25(2), 305–333.
66.
SonnenfeldJ., & SpenceP. L. (1989). The parting patriarch of a family firm.Family Business Review, 2(4), 355–375.
67.
SteinerG. A. (1979). Strategic planning.New York: Free Press.
68.
TagiuriR., & DavisJ. A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies.Family Business Review.5(1), 263–281.
69.
TrowD. B. (1961). Executive succession in small companies.Administrative Science Quarterly, 6: 228–239.
70.
VancilR. (1987). Passing the baton.Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
72.
WardJ. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73.
WardJ. L. (1991). Creating effective boards for private enterprises.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74.
WeickK. (1979). Enactment and organizing. In WeickK., (Ed.), The social psychology of organizing.New York: Random House.
75.
WelschJ. H. M. (1993). The impact of family ownership and involvement on the process of management succession.Family Business Review, 6(1), 31–54.
76.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analytical antitrust implications.New York: Free Press.
77.
WongB., McReynoldsS., & WongW., (1992). Chinese family firms in the San Francisco bay areas.Family Business Review, 5(4), 355–372.
78.
WortmanM. S.Jr. (1994). Theoretical foundations for family-owned business: A conceptual and research based paradigm.Family Business Review, 7(1), 3–27.