This study uses agency theory to examine CEO dismissal in venture capital-backed firms. Prior applications of agency theory have focused on reducing managerial opportunism by aligning the interests of manager with owner. Unlike large, mature firms, venture capital-backed companies feature high levels of CEO stock ownership. In this environment, we find that the primary reason for CEO dismissal is lack of agent ability, followed by good faith disagreements between principal and agent, with managerial opportunism ranking last. Further, we find that CEOs dismissed for opportunism owned more stock than those dismissed for other reasons.
ArmstrongJ. S., & OvertonS. T. (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.
3.
BerleA., & MeansG. (1932) The modern corporation and private property.New York: Macmillan.
4.
BrushG. C., & VanderWerfP. A. (1992) A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 157–170.
5.
BrutonG., FriedV., & HisrichR. D. (1998) Venture capitalist and CEO dismissal. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 21(3), 41–54.
6.
CableD. M., & ShaneS. (1997) A prisoner's dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 142–176.
7.
ChagantiR., & DamanpourF. (1991) Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 479–491.
8.
DaftR., & LewinA. Y. (1990) Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straightjacket?Organization Science, 1(1), 1–10.
9.
DessG. G., & RobinsonR. B. (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 265–273.
10.
EisenhardtK. (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1) 57–75.
11.
ElangoB., FriedV. H., HisrichR. D., & PolonchekA. (1995) How venture capital firms differ. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 157–179.
12.
FamaE. F., & JensenM. C. (1983) Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 301–325.
13.
FinkelsteinS., & HambrickD. (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484–503.
14.
FriedV. H. (1999) Private equity funding for minority media ownership. Federal Communication Law Journal, 51(3), 609–626.
15.
FriedV. H., & HisrichR. D. (1994) Toward a model of venture capital decision making. Financial Management, 23(3), 28–37.
16.
FriedV. H., & HisrichR. D. (1995) The venture capitalist: A relationship investor. California Management Review, 37(2), 101–113.
17.
HambrickD. C., & D'AveniR. A. (1992) Top management team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38, 1445–1466.
18.
HambrickD. C., & MasonP. (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
19.
MacMillanI. C., KulowD. M., & KhoylianR. (1988) Venture capitalists' involvement in their investments: Extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(1), 27–47.
20.
McConnellJ., & ServaesH. (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595–613.
21.
McDougallP., & RobinsonR. B. (1990) New venture strategies: An empirical identification of eight ‘archetypes’ of competitive strategies for entry. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 447–467.
22.
MichaelS. C. (1996) To franchise or not to franchise: An analysis of decision rights and organizational form shares. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 57–71.
23.
MorckR., ShleiferA., & VishnyR. (1988) Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–316.
24.
NortonE. (1995) Venture capital as an alternative means to allocate capital: An agency-theoretic view. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(2), 19–29.
25.
OswaldS. L., & JaheraJ. S. (1991) The influence of ownership on performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 321–326.
26.
PearceJ. A.II, & ZahraS. A. (1991) The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 135–153.
27.
RosensteinJ., BrunoA. V., BygraveW. D., & TaylorN. T. (1993) The CEO, venture capitalist, and the board. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 99–113.
28.
SahlmanW. A. (1988) Aspects of financial contracting in venture capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Summer, 23–36.
29.
SapienzaH. J., and GuptaA. K. (1994) Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalists-CEO interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1618–1632.
30.
TyebjeeT. T., & BrunoA. V. (1984) A model of venture capital investment activity. Management Science, 30, 1051–1066.
31.
WalshJ. P., & SewardJ. K. (1990) On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15, 421–458.
32.
WilsonJ. W. (1985) The new venturers: Inside the high stakes world of venture capital.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
