AbbasBReimannHPHirdDW: 1983, Diagnosis of Johne's disease (paratuberculosis) in northern California cattle and a note on its economic significance. Calif Vet820–24.
2.
BenedictusGDijkhuizenAAStelwagenJ: 1987, Economic loss due to paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 121: 142–146.
3.
ChiodiniRJVan KruiningenJJ: 1986, The prevalence of paratuberculosis in culled New England cattle. Cornell Vet76:91–104.
4.
ChiodiniRJVan KruiningenJJMerkalRS: 1984, Ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): The current status and future prospects. Cornell Vet74:217–262.
5.
ColgroveCSThoenCOBlackbumBO: 1989, Paratuberculosis in cattle: A comparison of three serologic tests with results of fecal culture. Vet Microbiol19: 183–187.
6.
CollinsMTKenefickKBSockettDC: 1990, Enhanced radiometric detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis using filter concentrated fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol28:2514–2519.
7.
CollinsMTMcLaughlinAR: 1989, Experience in Wisconsin in control and accreditation of Johne's disease infected herds. In: Johne's disease. Current trends in research, diagnosis and management, ed. MilnerARWoodPR, pp. 67–73. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
8.
CoxJCDraneDRidgeS: 1991, Development and evaluation of a rapid absorbed EIA for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis in cattle. Aust Vet J68: 157–160.
9.
de LisleGWSamaghBSDuncanJR: 1980, Bovine paratuberculosis. II. A comparison of fecal culture and the antibody response. Can J Comp Med44: 183–191.
10.
JonesRL: 1989, Review of recent research studies in the United States related to Johne's disease with emphasis on diagnosis and control of the disease. In: Johne's disease. Current trends in research, diagnosis and management, ed. MilnerARWoodPR, pp. 1–8. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
11.
KeownGH: 1974, The abdominal wall. In: Textbook of large animal surgery, ed. OehmeFWPrierJE, pp. 146–179. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
12.
KimYGBeth-NielsenSGordonJ: 1989, Comparison of two methods for isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples. Am J Vet Res50: 1110–1113.
13.
LarsenABMoyleAIHimesEM: 1978, Experimental vaccination of cattle against paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) with killed bacterial vaccines: A controlled field study. Am J Vet Res39:65–69.
14.
LarsenABVardamanTHMerkalRS: 1963, An extended study of a herd of cattle naturally infected with Johne's disease. II. The significance of the complement fixation test. Am J Vet Res24:948–950.
15.
MerkalRS: 1973, Laboratory diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc163: 1100–1102.
16.
MerkalRSWhippleDLSacksJM: 1987, Prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in ileocecal lymph nodes of cattle culled in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc190:676–680.
17.
MilnerARLepperAWDSymondsWN: 1987, Analysis by ELISA and western blotting of antibody reactivities in cattle infected with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis after absorption of serum with M. phlei. Res Vet Sci42: 140–144.
18.
MilnerARMackWNCoatesK: 1989, The absorbed ELISA for the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle. In: Johne's disease. Current trends in research, diagnosis and management, ed. MilnerARWoodPR, pp. 158–163. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
19.
MilnerARMackWNCoatesKJ: 1990, The sensitivity and specificity of a modified ELISA for the diagnosis of Johne's disease from a field trial in cattle. Vet Microbiol25: 193–198.
20.
National Veterinary Services Laboratory: 1986, Microtitration complement fixation techniques, pp. 1–18. National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Ames, IA.
21.
NorrisMJSpencerTL: 1989, The efficacy of the complement fixation test for the detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection in cattle. In: Johne's disease. Current trends in research, diagnosis and management, ed. MilnerARWoodPR, pp. 153–157. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
22.
PembertonDH: 1979, Diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle using mesenteric lymph node biopsy: Accuracy in clinical suspects. Aust Vet J55:217–219.
23.
RankinJD: 1961, The non-specificity of a complement fixation test used in the diagnosis of Johne's disease in cattle. Res Vet Sci2:89–95.
24.
RansohoffDFFeinsteinAR: 1978, Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med299:926–930.
25.
ShermanDMBrayBGayJM: 1989, Evaluation of the agar gel immunodiffusion test for the diagnosis of subclinical paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res50:525–530.
26.
ShermanDMGayJMBouleyDS: 1990, Comparison of the complement fixation and agar gel immunodiffusion tests for the diagnosis of subclinical bovine paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res51:461–465.
27.
ShermanDMMarkhamRJFBatesF: 1984, Agar gel immunodiffusion test for diagnosis of clinical paratuberculosis in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc185:179–182.
28.
SpanglerEBeth-NielsenSHeiderLE: 1988, A prospective evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) relative to fecal culture in the diagnosis of clinical and subclinical paratuberculosis in cattle in central Ohio. Acta Vet Stand84:243–245.
29.
UrbanceJWStahlDA: 1989, Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Abstr Annu Meet Am Sot Microbiol #U-39, p. 161 (abstract).
30.
US Department of Agriculture: 1974, Laboratory methods in veterinary mycobacteriology, pp. 1–57. Mycobacteriology Unit, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, APHIS, USDA, Ames, IA.
31.
VaryPHAndersenPRGreenE: 1990, Use of highly specific DNA probes and the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in Johne's disease. J Clin Microbiol28:933–937.
32.
WhippleDLMerkalRS: 1983, Modifications in the technique for cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. In: Proc First Int Colloq Res Paratuberculosis, ed. MerkalRS, pp. 80–90. National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA.
33.
WhippleDLMerkalRS: 1985, Procedures for the field and laboratory processing of fecal specimens for the isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. In: Proc Annu Meet Am Assoc Vet Lab Diagn, 28:239–245.
34.
WhitlockRHRosenbergerAESpencerPA: 1990, Laboratory culture techniques for Johne's disease: A critical evaluation of contamination and incubation times. In: Proc 93rd Annu Meet US Anim Health Assoc, pp. 382–386. USAHA, Richmond, VA.
35.
YokomizoY: 1986, Evaluation on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using Mycobacterium phlei-absorbed serum for the diagnosis or bovine paratuberculosis in a field study. Jpn Agric Res Q20:60–67.
36.
YokomizoYMerkalRSLylePAS: 1983, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of bovine immunoglobulin G1 antibody to a protoplasmic antigen of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res44:2205–2207.
37.
YokomizoYYugiHMerkalRS: 1985, A method of avoiding false-positive reactions in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Jpn J Vet Sci47:111–119.