Abstract
Five serological methods of diagnosing African horse sickness were evaluated, using a battery of serum samples from experimental horses vaccinated and challenged with each serotype of African horse sickness virus (AHSV1 through AHSV9): agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID), indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA), complement fixation (CF), virus neutralization (VN), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The 5 tests were also compared using a panel of field samples, convalescent equine sera with antibodies to domestic equine viral diseases, and sera from horses awaiting export. The ELISA described in this paper was group specific. It did not require calibration with a standard positive serum but did yield elevated values with negative sera that were repeatedly frozen and thawed or heat inactivated. The IFA test was sensitive but could not be used on some field sera as the control cells exhibited fluorescence, possibly due to the animal being recently vaccinated with cell culture material. Sixty-two experimental sera were compared by VN, CF, AGID, and ELISA. Forty sera, 10 positive and 30 negative, were correctly classified by the 5 serologic assays. The 22 remaining sera gave mixed reactions. The AGID had no false positive results but had false negative results for up to 20% of the samples, depending upon the comparison. The VN, CF, and ELISA were similar in their variability.
The length of time that virus could be recovered from a viremic blood sample was compared in an evaluation of storage methods for virus isolation samples. Washed erythrocytes were held at 4 C, washed erythrocytes plus stabilizer were held at −70 C, and blood that was drawn into a preservative (oxalate/phenol/glycerol) was held at 4 C. Virus was isolated for 12 months from a sample stored as washed erythrocytes at 4 C but for only 6 months from the same blood stored by the other 2 methods.