Comparison of different serological methods to detect antibodies specific to Neospora caninum in bovine and canine sera

Abstract

Neospora caninum is an apicomplexan parasite responsible for paresis in dogs and abortion in cattle worldwide. Dogs serve as a definitive host, while cattle serve as intermediate host. Many different methods have been developed to detect specific antibodies present in cattle and dog serum. In the present study, the dense granule protein NcGRA6 was incorporated in a latex beads agglutination test (LAT), and compared to other serological methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the direct agglutination test, the immunoblot, and the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). Using the IFAT as the reference method, 100 sera isolated from Algerian cattle and 100 sera isolated from Algerian dogs, both possibly infected with N. caninum, were used to evaluate the LAT. The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa index were calculated for each host species and assay. For dog sera, the sensitivity and the specificity of the LAT was 76% and 100%, respectively. The McNemar test showed that the LAT was not significantly different from IFAT (P > 0.05). For cattle sera, the sensitivity and the specificity of the LAT were 60% and 100%, respectively. The McNemar test indicated that the LAT was significantly different from IFAT (P < 0.01) and that the LAT was only positive for cattle sera with titers of 1:800 or greater, indicating that LAT can be used for cattle in a clinical context. As well, the LAT has the advantage of being easy and rapid to perform compared to the other assays.

Neospora caninum, the causative agent of neosporosis, is an apicomplexan intracellular parasite causing paresis in dogs and abortion in cattle.^2,3 Studies of the domestic life cycle of the parasite have shown that dogs are both intermediate and definitive hosts, whereas cattle are natural intermediate hosts. ²

Diagnosis of neosporosis can be achieved using histology, immunohistochemical staining, polymerase chain reaction, and serology. ⁴ Serological tests have the advantage that they can be applied antemortem, but suffer from not being able to discriminate between latent and acute infections. ⁴ Serological techniques for the specific detection of bovine and canine antibodies to N. caninum include the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), ² immunoblotting (IB), ¹ the direct agglutination test (DAT), ¹⁷ and a variety of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). ⁵ The accepted reference method for serological diagnosis is IFAT, ⁶ with IFAT having been used in many species and generally considered the “gold standard” when evaluating new methods.^2–4

However, use of whole tachyzoite antigen in any serological assay may result in high background absorbance values and cross-reactivity with antibodies against related parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii. ⁵ Compared with the native antigens, recombinant antigens are easily produced in large quantities and can be readily standardized for diagnostic assays. In addition, their use may minimize the risk of cross-reactivity with other parasite species. ¹⁵

The molecular search for diagnostic antigens for N. caninum infection has focused on the identifying immunodominant antigens that are recognized by sera from infected animals. In this sense, the dense granule proteins, NcGRA7 and NcGRA6, of N. caninum were shown to be effective candidates to diagnose N. caninum infection in cattle when used in ELISA.^9–11

In contrast to the other serological techniques (e.g., ELISA, IFAT, IB), which are laborious and time-consuming and require specialized expertise and equipment, the latex agglutination test (LAT) is a technique that is very simple to carry out, making it suitable for clinical or field applications. ¹⁸ In the present study, the performance of a LAT using recombinant NcGRA6 was evaluated for the serological detection of specific antibodies to N. caninum and compared with other serological techniques for the detection of specific antibodies to N. caninum in cattle and dogs in Algeria.

The complementary DNA encoding the GRA6 protein of N. caninum was cloned in frame with an upstream polyhistidine tag sequence in a commercial plasmid ^a to give the pHisGRA6 plasmid. This plasmid was introduced by electroporation into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)pLysS cells. ^b The recombinant cells were selected on trypticase soy agar plates ^c containing 150 µg/ml of ampicillin. Colonies were analyzed by extracting plasmid DNA using a mini DNA kit, ^d followed by an enzymatic restriction of the plasmid DNA using restriction enzyme digestion with BamHI and KpnI endonucleases. ^e The restriction products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis to check for the presence of a band of 4.4 kb corresponding to the vector and a band of 0.95 kb corresponding to the GRA6 insert.

In order to induce the production of the recombinant GRA6 protein, a 500-ml trypticase soy broth ^c containing 50 µg/ml of kanamycin was inoculated with a singlecolony of E. coli BL21 (pHisGRA6). Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) ^f was added to the culture at a final concentration of 0.5 mM when the culture optical density at 600 nm reached 0.5. An aliquot was removed after 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr of induction, and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). In order to identify the recombinant protein, a commercially sourced antibody ^g (that recognizes the peptide Asp-Leu-Tyr-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys), an anti-polyhistidine monoclonal antibody, ^h and a N. caninum–positive cattle serum ⁶ were used in a Western blot as previously described. ⁶

In the production process of the recombinant GRA6 protein, a 33-kDa protein was clearly induced (Fig. 1A). In order to confirm that the 33-kDa protein was the recombinant GRA6 protein, Western blots with either monoclonalantibodies specific to the tag peptide (Fig. 1B, 1C) or a polyclonal sera positive for N. caninum (Fig. 1D) were used. As expected, in each case, the 33-kDa protein was detected. The tagged protein was purified using, successively, 2 different commercial kits^i,j in order to remove the remaining residual bands (Fig. 2). The concentration of the protein suspension was determined by the Lowry method ^k and adjusted to 0.5 mg/ml in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). ^l

Figure 1.

Induction of the recombinant (r)GRA6 protein. Lane 0: no induction; lane 1: 1-hr induction; lane 2: 2-hr induction; lane 3: 3-hr induction; lane 4: 4-hr induction. A, result of sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. B, immunoblot with the anti-Xpress monoclonal antibody. C, immunoblot with anti-polyhistidine monoclonal antibody. D, immunoblot with an anti–Neospora caninum polyclonal serum. The arrow indicates the rGRA6 protein. Molecular weight standards, in kilodaltons (kDa), are indicated.

Figure 2.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified recombinant (r)GRA6 protein. Lane 1: total protein extract prior to affinity purification; lane 2: protein banding profile after purification with a commercial kit ⁱ ; lane 3: protein banding profile after purification with the second commercial kit. ^j The arrow indicates the rGRA6 protein. Molecular weight standards, in kilodaltons (kDa), are marked.

Latex beads were coated with the purified recombinant GRA6 protein as previously described. ¹⁶ In brief, 1 ml of 10% ml latex beads ^m (0.8 µm in diameter) was washed 3 times in 5 ml of carbonate buffer (pH 9.6; 2,500 × g for 30 min). The pellet was suspended in 3 ml of carbonate buffer and 1.75 ml of the GRA6 recombinant protein (approximately 0.9 mg) and incubated for 3 hr at 37°C and then overnight at 4°C. The sensitized beads were centrifuged and suspended in 5 ml of carbonate buffer containing 5% sucrose and 0.3% bovine serum albumin to block the nonoccupied sites. The beads were then incubated for 30 min at 37°C, centrifuged, and washed twice in PBS (pH 7.4), and suspended in 3 ml of PBS. The proficiency of the coating was controlled using IFAT coated beads and a positive and a negative anti–N. caninum polyclonal serum. The epifluorescence was restricted to classical IFAT background with the nonimmune serum, and the epifluorescence was bright and clearly positive with the immune serum (data not shown). The sera were used to agglutinate the coated latex beads. A droplet (10 µl) of beads was mixed with a droplet (10 µl) of sera on a glass slide with a bacteriological loop. After 5 min, the result was observed. The strength of agglutination was graded as – (no visible aggregated beads), + (some aggregated beads with a majority of nonaggregated beads), ++ (equal amount of aggregated and non-aggregated beads), or +++ (majority of aggregated beads). Latex agglutination test was then compared with other serological tests for N. caninum antibodies using dog and bovine sera.

A total of 100 serum samples collected from March to June 2009 from Algerian dogs were analyzed. Likewise, serum samples from 100 Algerian cattle were collected from April to August 2009 and used in the LAT evaluation. For dog sera, an ELISA previously described ¹⁴ and based on sonicated tachyzoites was used (termed ELISA-U). A previously validated commercial ELISA^n,7 (termed ELISA-X) was also used. The commercial ELISA-X is a sandwich ELISA based on recombinant NcSRS2 antigen. For cattle sera, a commercial ELISA ^o (termed ELISA-H) was used because it was a well-validated assay. ¹⁹ An additional commercial ELISA-X ⁿ was also used on cattle sera. ⁷ The DAT was performed as previously described. ¹⁷ An IB assay based on total tachyzoite protein extract was used as previously described.^7,8

For the purpose of the current study, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were defined as the relative Se and the relative Sp of the tested assay in comparison to the reference assay (IFAT). The Youden index (Y) ¹² (in %) is the sum of the Sp (in %) and the Se (in %) minus 100: Y = (Se + Sp) – 100. The value ranges between 0% and 100%. The kappa index (κ) is a statistical measure of inter-rater agreement and by extension to interassay agreement and was calculated and evaluated as previously described. ¹² The strength of the agreement for the kappa coefficient was evaluated as follows: ≤0 = poor; 0.01–0.20 = slight; 0.21–0.40 = fair; 0.41–0.60 = moderate; 0.61–0.80 = substantial; and 0.81–1.00 = almost perfect. The McNemar test ¹² was applied to the serological test results, and the P values were calculated. The test was considered as significantly different from the reference test when P < 0.05.

Among the 100 tested canine sera, 25 were positive (at the dilution 1:50) and 75 were negative by IFAT. Of the 5 assays evaluated, sensitivities were between 60% and 88%, with ELISA-X having the highest Se. The Se of the LAT (76%) was intermediate. Specificities were high for all assays, including LAT, being greater than or equal to 99% (Table 1). None of the serological tests, with the exception of ELISA-U, were significantly different from IFAT (P > 0.05).

Table 1.

Comparison of serological methods used to detect antibodies specific to Neospora caninum in bovine and canine sera.*

Sera†/Method	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Youden index (%)	Kappa index (agreement evaluation)	McNemar test (P value)
Dog
ELISA-X	88	99	87	0.89 (almost perfect)	0.62
ELISA-U	60	100	60	0.69 (substantial)	<0.01
DAT	72	99	71	0.77 (substantial)	0.08
LAT	76	99	75	0.68 (substantial)	0.13
IB	85	100	85	0.92 (almost perfect)	0.13
Cattle
ELISA-H	85	98	83	0.85 (almost perfect)	0.13
ELISA-X	77	100	77	0.81 (almost perfect)	<0.01
DAT	65	100	65	0.69 (substantial)	<0.01
LAT	60	100	60	0.64 (substantial)	<0.01
IB	100	100	100	1 (almost perfect)	1.00

*

ELISA = commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; DAT = direct agglutination test; LAT = latex agglutination test; IB = immunoblot. Both ELISA-H ^o and ELISA-X ⁿ are commercial assays that were used as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The third assay, ELISA-U, was used as previously described. ¹⁴

†

In the dog sera, 25 were positive (at the dilution 1:50) by the reference method—the indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT)—while 75 were negative by IFAT. In the cattle sera, 40 were positive by IFAT (at the dilution 1:200) and 60 were negative by IFAT.

For bovine sera, 40 sera were positive in IFAT at the dilution 1:200, 32 at dilution 1:400, 24 at dilution 1:800, and 11 at dilution 1:1,600. The Se of the IB was 100%, indicating that all the positive sera in IFAT were also positive in IB. The other methods were less sensitive than the IB method, with LAT having a 60% Se (Table 1). For LAT, only strongly positive sera (titer 1:800 or higher) were positive. The Se results were better because all of the methods but the ELISA-H showed a Sp of 100%, indicating that all sera negative in IFAT were also scored as negative with the other techniques. The combination of the Sp and the Se reflected by the Youden index indicated that the ideal score of 100% was reached by IB, while the other techniques obtained a score ranging from 83% (ELISA-H) to 60% (LAT). Finally, the kappa index gave the same ranking with the IB displaying 100% correlation with IFAT, and ELISA tests giving a score higher than 80%. The agglutination methods (DAT and LAT) on the other hand obtained a kappa index lower than 70%. According to these results, the McNemar test indicated that DAT, LAT, and ELISA-X methods were significantly different from IFAT (P < 0.05).

The detection of antibodies directed to N. caninum is undertaken worldwide both in dogs and in cattle. ⁵ The reference method for the detection of antibodies directed to N. caninum is the IFAT. ² The drawbacks to IFAT are that the method requires cell cultures and fluorescence microscopy, and expertise in discerning positive and negative samples. Moreover, only a few samples can be tested on a single slide. The commercial ELISA showed good Se (>75%) and excellent Sp (approximately 100%) values. Others have stated that ELISA is a viable alternative to IFAT for the detection of N. caninum antibodies in animals because a large number of sera can be tested on a single ELISA plate. ⁴ However, while a number of ELISA methods have been developed and commercialized, ⁴ the technique requires a multi-well plate reader for analyzing reactions, thus limiting its use in the field or in poorly equipped laboratories in developing countries.

Immunoblotting is mainly used as a confirmatory method ¹ and provides additional information such as the molecular weight of the reactive antigens. From a technical point of view, this method suffers from a need for native antigen preparation, SDS-PAGE and electrophoretic blotting, and finally antigen detection. Standardization of such a method is also difficult because antigen preparations can vary from one experiment to another. ⁴ In the current study, the IB method had high Sp and Se, but may be a poor primary screening method because of the low numbers of samples that can be analyzed at one time. Immunoblotting represents an excellent method to corroborate clinical findings and results of other serological assays.

The DAT involves the agglutination of whole tachyzoites, thus requiring free tachyzoites produced in cell cultures. ¹⁷ As expected, the DAT method displayed specificities and sensitivities similar to LAT. The preparation of the tachyzoites in this technique seems to be crucial and maybe difficult to standardize in laboratories not familiar with this technique.

In contrast, the use of latex beads coated with a recombinant antigen offers another way to perform agglutination. The LAT is a simple, rapid method, which makes it suitable for clinical or field applications. A key issue in the development of a LAT is the selection of the antigen to bind to the beads. Immunodominant antigens are the best candidates because they induce high titers of specific antibodies. The advantage of this method is that coating beads requires very few basic materials, primarily latex beads and purified proteins. The agglutination test requires only a solid support, the coated beads, and the serum to be tested. Therefore, this method can be used in basic clinical laboratories and in the field.

In the present work, the dense granule protein GRA6 was used because it appears to be an immunodominant N. caninum antigen.^10,13 The results indicated that the Se of the LAT ranged from 60% to 76% for dog and cattle sera, respectively. On the other hand, the Sp of the LAT was nearly 100% for both canine and bovine sera. The high Sp and moderate Se indicates that LAT is an adequate test for corroborating clinical findings of neosporosis. Overall, the results indicated that the LAT with NcGRA6 is a rapid, simple, and inexpensive diagnostic test that may be suitable for detecting N. caninum–specific antibodies in dogs and cattle infection under field conditions. Improvements in the linking of the NcGRA6 protein to beads and increasing the binding signal may improve the Se of LAT.