Abstract
Objective
Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in Australia and New Zealand is reserved for terminally ill individuals experiencing unbearable suffering. This study investigated the knowledge and views of Australian and New Zealand psychiatrists and trainees on VAD, including for mental illnesses, and whether these knowledge and views differ between psychiatrists and trainees.
Methods
Participants completed an online survey consisting of 18 questions between March and June 2024. The survey was distributed via various Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists newsletters and through snowballing.
Results
One hundred and sixty-four psychiatrists and sixty-five trainees were included. Psychiatrists tended to be more confident in their knowledge of VAD, less willing to be involved with VAD and more conservative in their views of VAD than trainees: 26.8% of psychiatrists and 10.8% of trainees strongly agreed that the criteria for VAD will progressively broaden (p < .047).
Conclusion
Differences in experience may explain some of these distinctions; however, other factors are likely to have been influential in explaining these differences. Given the increasingly liberalised and autonomous social landscape, Australian and New Zealand psychiatry should prepare themselves for the ethical question of VAD for mental illnesses that will inevitably arise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
