Abstract
Objective:
As burnout has been neglected in medical and psychiatric education, we seek to provide a summary overview.
Methods:
We extract salient findings from the published literature and offer some challenges.
Results:
We critique the current principal model of burnout, argue for broadening the symptom constructs and for a diathesis-stress model where a perfectionistic personality style is a key predisposing factor, and observe that burnout is not limited by those in formal work. We argue that burnout is not synonymous with depression, overview biological underpinnings, and summarise a three-fold management model.
Conclusion:
As many burnout patients are referred to psychiatrists, awareness of its symptom pattern and management nuances is of key importance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
