Abstract
Objective:
To argue that lack of capacity, lack of insight and anosognosia represent different facets of an interconnected, underlying process.
Methods:
Electronic and manual literature search.
Results:
There is demographic, clinical, neurocognitive and possible neuroanatomical overlap between lack of capacity, lack of insight and anosognosia.
Conclusion:
The use of different terms may reflect the background of the authors and their investigative methodologies rather than unrelated phenomena. Anosognosia is preferred as it progresses research and usefully informs clinical and legal practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
