Benchmarking to reduce restrictive practices in forensic mental health services: a Delphi study

Abstract

Objectives:

Forensic mental health services (FMHS) have higher rates, duration and frequency of restrictive practices (seclusion, physical restraint and mechanical restraint). Data generated by services can be used to set targets (benchmarks) with like services to reduce or eliminate restrictive practices. The aim of this study was to develop restrictive practice benchmarks for Australian and New Zealand FMHS.

Method:

A participatory action research methodology was used by conducting a Delphi study. FMHS experts provided de-identified service-specific restrictive practice data, which was used to stimulate reflection towards the development of restrictive practice benchmarks.

Results:

Consensus decision-making was reached on benchmarks for the rate, duration and frequency of seclusion and physical restraint. Mechanical restraint was found to be a rare event, requiring event specific review in each service.

Conclusions:

Benchmarking with FMHS may assist in working to reduce restrictive practices and encourage the scrutiny of service practice. Establishment of a FMHS network might assist to embed the proposed benchmarks.