Given the differences between our profession and the broader set of medical disciplines, a review of the factors to be considered in treatment planning was conducted.
Conclusion:
Treatment planning in psychiatry is inherently more complicated than in other medical disciplines for various reasons including: a broader range of conceptual models of mental illness and treatment; greater complexities around nosology and diagnosis; the greater limitations of the research evidence base and clinical practice guidelines; and the more substantial impacts of patients’ subjectivity and contextual aspects.
Diagnosis is generally neither a sufficient nor necessarily the most useful criterion for treatment planning in psychiatry, with a number of other considerations to help guide treatment being outlined.
JormAFReavleyNJ. Changes in psychological distress in Australian adults between 1995 and 2011. Aust N Z J Psychiatry2012; 46: 352–356.
2.
KatschnigH. Are psychiatrists an endangered species? Observations on internal and external challenges to the profession. World Psychiatry2010; 9: 21–28.
3.
MellsopGMenkesDEl-BadriS. Releasing psychiatry from the constraints of categorical diagnosis. Australas Psychiatry2007; 15: 3–5.
4.
FreedmanRLewisDAMichelsR, et al. The initial field trials of DSM-5: new blooms and old thorns. Am J Psychiatry2013; 170: 1–5.
5.
FrancesA. The past, present and future of psychiatric diagnosis. World Psychiatry2013; 12: 111–112.
6.
JacobKS. Major depression: revisiting the concept and diagnosis. Adv Psychiatr Treat2009; 15: 279–285.
7.
MajM. Validity and clinical utility of the current operational characterization of major depression. Int Rev Psychiatry2012; 24: 530–537.
8.
KrackeWILoweH. The language of the problem list in psychiatry. Int J Mental Health1977; 6: 26–36.
9.
HarrisGTRiceME. An empirical approach to classification and treatment planning. J Clin Psychol1990; 46: 3–15.
FaravelliCCastelliniGLandiM, et al. Are psychiatric diagnoses an obstacle for research and practice. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2012; 8: 12–15.
12.
YagerJFeinsteinRE. Potential applications of the National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria to clinical psychiatric practice. J Clin Psychiatry2017; 78: 423–432.
13.
LittleJDDavidsonLLittleRD. Clinically, what ought we to believe?Australas Psychiatry2019; 27: 72–74.
14.
BauneBTBoycePMorrisG, et al. Organising the front line: is there a rationale for the first-line pharmacotherapy of major depressive disorder?Aust N Z J Psychiatry2019; 53: 279–281.
15.
BergnerRM. Characteristics of optimal clinical case formulation: the linchpin concept. Am J Psychother1998; 52: 287–300.
16.
NorcrossJCWampoldBE. What works for whom: tailoring psychotherapy to the person. J Clin Psychol: In Session2011; 67: 127–132.
17.
BeutlerLEHarwoodTMKimparaS, et al. Coping style. J Clin Psychol: In Session2011; 67: 176–183.
18.
BeutlerLEHarwoodTMMichelsonA, et al. Resistance/reactance level. J Clin Psychol: In Session2011; 67: 133–142.
19.
NorcrossJCKrebsPMProchaskaJO, et al. Stages of change. J Clin Psychol: In Session2011; 67: 143–154.
20.
SmithTBRodriguezMDBewrnalG.Culture. J Clin Psychol: In Session2011; 67: 166–175.
21.
ConstantinoMJArnkoffDBGlassCR, et al. Expectations. J Clin Psychol: In Session2011; 67: 184–192.
22.
SwiftJKCallahanJLVolmerBM. Preferences. J Clin Psychol: In Session2011; 67: 155–165.
23.
BeutlerLESomeahKKimparaS, et al. Selecting the most appropriate treatment for each patient. Int J Clin Health Psychol2016; 16, 99–108.
