To explore the clinical implications associated with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN-CRPD), and coercive practice.
Conclusions:
Both human rights and clinical perspectives are necessary in the management of the mentally ill.
DufourMHastingsTO’ReillyR.Canada should retain its reservation on the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Can J Psychiatry2018; 706743718784939.
3.
NyttingnesORuudTRugkasaJ.‘It’s unbelievably humiliating’ – Patient’s experience of negative effects of coercion in mental health care. Int J Law Psychiatry2016; 49: 147–153.
4.
WinickBJ. The side effects of incompetency labelling and the implications for mental health law. Psychol Public Policy Law1995; 1: 6–42.
5.
FeinbergJ. Legal paternalism. Can J Philosophy1971; 1: 105–124.
RosenARosenTMcGorryP. The rights of people with severe and persistent mental illness. In: DudleyMSiloveDGaleF (eds) Mental health and human rights, Ch 16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
8.
ChurchillROwenGSinghSet al. International experiences of using community treatment orders. London (GB): Institute of Psychiatry, 2007.
9.
CarterGMilnerAMcGillKet al. Predicting suicidal behaviours using clinical instruments: systematic review and meta-analysis of positive predictive values for risk scales. Br J Psychiatry2017; 210: 387–395.
WertheimerA. A philosophical examination of coercion for mental health issues. Behav Sci Law1993; 11: 239–258.
12.
FreemanMCKolappaKCaldasdeAlmeidaJMet al. Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Lancet2015; 2: 844–850.
13.
GrayJEO’ReillyRL. Supreme Court of Canada’s ‘Beautiful Mind’ Case. Int J Law Psychiatry2009; 32: 315–322.
14.
SzawarskiP. Classic cases re-visited: the suicide of Kerrie Wooltorton. J Intensive Care Soc2013; 14: 211–214.
15.
WellerP. Towards a genealogy of ‘coercive care’. In: McSherryBFreckeltonI (eds) Coercive Care. Chapter 2, Abingdon: Routledge, 2013, pp. 15–30.
16.
LordJESteinMA. Contingent participation and coercive care. In: McSherryBFreckeltonI (eds) Coercive care. Chapter 3. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013, pp. 31–48.
17.
AtkinsK. Autonomy and the subjective character of experience. J Appl Philos2000; 17: 71–79.
18.
DonnellyM. Health care, decision making and the law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
19.
BannerNF. Can procedural and substantive elements of decision-making be reconciled in assessments of mental capacity?Int J Law Context2013; 9: 71–86.
20.
CharlandLC. Is Mr Spock mentally competent?Philos Psychiatry Psychol1998; 5: 67–81.
21.
BecharaADamasioHDamasioAR. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex2000; 10: 295–307.
22.
ChariandLC. Mental competence and value: the problem of normativity in the assessment of decision-making capacity. Psychiatry Psychol ad Law2001; 8: 135–145.
23.
AmadorXFKronengoldH. In: Amador XF and David AS (eds) Insight and psychosis. 2nd edn, Chapter1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 3–30.
24.
OsatukeKCieslaJKasckowJWet al. Insight in schizophrenia: a review of etiological models and supporting research. Compr Psychiatry2008; 49: 70–77.
