Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-6
Supervision contracts for mental health professionals: a systematic review and exploration of the potential relevance to psychiatry training in Australia and New Zealand
The use of formal supervision contracts has been strongly advocated across non-medical mental health professions. However, the use of such agreements is not a feature of the RANZCP Competency-Based Fellowship Program. This paper critically examines the evidence to support the use of formal supervision contracts.
Method:
A systematic review of empirical studies relating to the outcomes of supervision contracts was completed. Included records were subject to quality appraisal.
Results:
Two studies met the inclusion criteria; both were assessed to be of poor quality. One study found improved supervision effectiveness associated with the use of supervision contracts, and the other found no significant differences associated with formal contracting.
Conclusion:
Despite strong advocacy, limited empirical evidence was found to support the value of formal supervision contracts across mental health professions.
CheungGStephanA.Supervision: ‘a random bag of arrangements’? Perspectives from psychiatrists on how to improve clinical teaching. Australas Psychiatry2017; 25: 510–513.
2.
ParkerSSuetaniSMotamarriB.On being supervised: getting value from a clinical supervisor and making the relationship work when it is not. Australas Psychiatry2017; 25: 625–629.
3.
StephanACheungG.Clinical teaching and supervision in postgraduate psychiatry training: the trainee perspective. Australas Psychiatry2017; 25: 191–197.
KimHSuetaniS.Power, Paranoia and Partnerships. Aust N Z J Psychiatry2018; 52: 3–156.
6.
MartinPCopleyJTyackZ.Twelve tips for effective clinical supervision based on a narrative literature review and expert opinion. Med Teach2014; 36: 201–207.
7.
BarnettJEMolzonCH.Clinical supervision of psychotherapy: essential ethics issues for supervisors and supervisees. J Clin Psychol2014; 70: 1051–1061.
FlåmAM.Dialogical Research in supervision: practical guidelines from experienced supervisors in family therapy, child protection, and specialty mental health services. Aust N Z J Fam Ther2016; 37: 282–296.
15.
SpenceSHWilsonJKavanaghD, et al. Clinical supervision in four mental health professions: a review of the evidence. Behav Change2001; 18: 135–155.
16.
BernardJMGoodyearRK.Fundamentals of clinical supervision. 4th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson, 2009.
17.
SutterEMcPhersonRHGeesemanR.Contracting for supervision. Prof Psychol Res Pr2002; 33: 495–498.
18.
HollowayE.Clinical supervision: a systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 1995.
19.
CoreyGHaynesRHMoultonP, et al. Clinical supervision in the helping professions: a practical guide. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association, 2010.
20.
CassedyP.First steps in clinical supervision: a guide for healthcare professionals. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2010.
MorrellM.Supervision contracts revisited – towards a negotiated agreement. Aotearoa N Z Social Work Rev2008; 20: 22–31.
27.
MartinPCopleyJTyackZ.Twelve tips for effective clinical supervision based on a narrative literature review and expert opinion. Med Teach2014; 36: 201–207.
28.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. The BMJ2009; 339: 332–336.
SaxbyCWilsonJNewcombeP.Can clinical supervision sustain our workforce in the current healthcare landscape? Findings from a Queensland study of allied health professionals. Aust Health Rev2015; 39: 476–482.
32.
BowlesNYoungC.An evaluative study of clinical supervision based on Proctor’s three function interactive model. J Adv Nursing1999; 30: 958–964.
33.
KavanaghDJSpenceSHWilsonJ, et al. Achieving effective supervision. Drug Alcohol Rev2002; 21: 247–252.
34.
McNamaraMLKangosKACorpDA, et al. Narratives of harmful clinical supervision: synthesis and recommendations. Clin Supervisor2017; 36: 124–144.
