Building a bridge: A case report on communicating mental-health diagnoses to patients of a culturally and linguistically diverse background

Abstract

Objective:

This paper is based on a case report, describing a protocol to help practitioners communicate mental-health diagnosis to patients from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. The protocol was presented by integrating the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) and the SPIKES protocol for communicating the diagnosis of cancer, yielding a modified CFI-SPIKES protocol (i.e. S, Support; P, Perception using CFI; I, Invitation; K, Knowledge; E, Emotions). The protocol was demonstrated using a case report with a patient of a Middle-Eastern background experiencing generalised anxiety disorder.

Conclusions:

The CFI-SPIKES protocol for communicating mental-health diagnosis allows for a collaborative process, whereby the CALD patient and practitioner can address the stigma associated with communicating a mental-health diagnosis, ensuring patient engagement and informed shared decision making.

Keywords

diagnosis culture mental health protocol communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. People from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, http://www.aihw.gov.au/aged-care/residential-and-community-2012-13/diverse-background/ (2013, accessed 9 August 2017).

Ethnic Communities Council Victoria. ECCV glossary of terms, http://www.eccv.org.au/library/file/document/ECCV_Glossary_of_Terms_23_October.docx. (2016, accessed 9 August 2017).

Logan

Rouen

Wagner

et al . Mental health service use and ethnicity: an analysis of service use and time to access treatment by South East Asian-, Middle Eastern-, and Australian-born patients within Sydney, Australia. Aust J Psychol 2017; 69: 12–19.

Milton

Mullan

BA.

Communication of a mental health diagnosis: a systematic synthesis and narrative review. J Mental Health 2014; 23: 261–270.

Schouten

Meeuwesen

Cultural differences in medical communication: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 64: 21–34.

Hawley

Morris

AM.

Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100: 18–24.

Hibbard

JH.

Patient activation and the use of information to support informed health decisions. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100: 5–7.

Street

Jr Volk

Lowenstein

et al . Engaging patients in the uptake, understanding, and use of evidence: addressing barriers and facilitators of successful engagement. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100: 4.

Deen

W-H

Rothstein

et al . Asking questions: the effect of a brief intervention in community health centers on patient activation. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 84: 257–260.

10.

Hwang

W-C.

Diagnostic nondisclosure of schizophrenia to Chinese American patients. Asian J Couns 2008; 1–31.

11.

Rose

Thornicroft

Service user perspectives on the impact of a mental illness diagnosis. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2011; 19: 140–147.

12.

Milton

Mullan

BA.

Diagnosis telling in people with psychosis. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2014; 27: 302–307.

13.

Baile

Buckman

Lenzi

et al . SPIKES – a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 2000; 5: 302–311.

14.

Milton

Mullan

Views and experience of communication when receiving a serious mental health diagnosis: satisfaction levels, communication preferences, and acceptability of the SPIKES protocol. J Mental Health 2016; 1–10.

15.

Lewis-Fernández

Aggarwal

Bäärnhielm

et al . Culture and psychiatric evaluation: operationalizing cultural formulation for DSM-5. Psychiatry 2014; 77: 130–154.

16.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.

17.

Mittal

Dean

Mittal

et al . Ethical, legal, and clinical considerations when disclosing a high-risk syndrome for psychosis. Bioethics 2015; 29: 543–556.