Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

Most postgraduate training for clinicians in Australia and New Zealand regarding mental health legislation focuses on the relevant Mental Health Acts (MHAs) rather than the broader principles of mental health law. Key concepts include treatment in the least restrictive environment, voluntary access to mental health services, treatability, reciprocity and due process. Lack of awareness of these principles may result in a more risk-averse interpretation of MHAs, which is inconsistent with the spirit of mental health law and the promotion of human rights. The aim of this paper is to present some fundamental principles of mental health law, which are essential to proper clinical application of MHAs, and to demonstrate why they should form part of the curriculum for psychiatry training and continuing professional development for psychiatrists.

Conclusions:

A sound understanding of the principles of mental health law is essential for all clinicians who may be enacting aspects of MHAs. This provides the necessary platform to safeguard human rights and optimise the care of people with a mental illness.

Keywords

human rights legislation mental health mental health law psychiatric training

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wand

APF

Maheshwari

Holton

. Mindful of the gaps: Enhancing psychiatry training through a trainee workshop. Australas Psychiatry 2012; 20: 231–236.

Eastman

. Mental health law: Civil liberties and the principle of reciprocity. BMJ 1994; 308: 43–45.

Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW).

NSW Institute of Psychiatry. Accredited person’s handbook. Parramatta, NSW, Australia: NSW Institute of Psychiatry, 2009.

Gostin

. Human rights of persons with mental disabilities. Int J Law Psychiatry 2000; 23: 125–159.

Rees

. International human rights obligations and mental health review tribunals. Psychiatry Psychol Law 2003; 10: 33–43.

Commonwealth of Australia. Fourth National Mental Health Plan – An agenda for collaborative government action in mental health 2009–2014. Barton, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia, 2009.

World Health Organisation. Mental health care law: Ten basic principles. Geneva: WHO, 1996.

Council of Europe. Draft Recommendation concerning the protection of human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorder. Council of Europe. Available at: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=749565&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=C3C3C3&BackColorIntranet=EDB021&BackColorLogged=F5D383 (2004, accessed 19 September 2012).

10.

United Nations High Commission of Human Rights. Principles for the protection of persons with mental illness and the improvement of mental health care. Resolution 46/119. Geneva: UNHCHR, 1991.

11.

United Nations General Assembly. Final report of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities. Item 67(b). UN General Assembly, 2006.

12.

Wand

Chiarella

. A Conversation: Challenging the relevance and wisdom of separate mental health legislation. Int J Mental Health Nurs 2006; 15: 119–127.

13.

Undrill

. The risks of risk assessment. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2007; 13, 291–297.

14.

Fistein

Holland

Clare

ICH

. A comparison of mental health legislation from diverse Commonwealth jurisdictions. Int J Law Psychiatry 2009; 32: 147–155.

15.

Mulder

. Problems with suicide risk assessment. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2011; 45: 605–607.

16.

Wand

. Investigating the evidence for the effectiveness of risk assessment in mental health care. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2012; 33: 2–7.

17.

Ryan

Nielssen

Paton

. Clinical decisions in psychiatry should not be based on risk assessment. Australas Psychiatry 2010; 18, 398–402.

18.

Millard

. The treatability requirement in psychopathy: A new ethical dilemma? J Med Ethics 1984; 2: 88–90.

19.

Joint Home Office and Department of Health Working Group. Managing dangerous people with personality disorders. London: HMSO, 1999.

20.

Akuffo

. The involuntary detention of persons with mental disorder in England and Wales – A human rights critique. Int J Law Psychiatry 2004; 27: 109–133.

21.

Harris

. House of Commons Debate 19 June 2007. Hansard col. 1277.

22.

Gostin

. Beyond moral claims: A human rights approach in mental health. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2001; 10: 264–274.

23.

Campbell

. The rights approach to mental illness. Philosophy 1984; 18(Suppl. 84): 221–254.

24.

Goonan

Healy

Moynihan

. The death of the subject: Human rights, due process and psychiatry. Int J Law Psychiatry 2000; 23: 23–41.

25.

Peay

. Tribunals on trial: Study of decision making in the Mental Health Act 1983. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

26.

Ryan

Callaghan

. Meeting the call of the coroner: Detention and release of patients under the Mental Health Act. Newsletter NSW Branch RANZCP 2011; (April): 17–19.

‘Admit voluntary,schedule if tries to leave’: placing Mental Health Acts in the context of mental health law and human rights

Abstract

Objectives:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References