This contribution highlights the role of organizational context in facilitating or hindering recovery from work and introduces the concept of Organizational Climate for Recovery (OCR), defined as employees’ shared perceptions of the extent to which recovery activities are expected, supported and encouraged within the organization. This paper is a conceptual study with exploratory qualitative evidence. Description of recovery and organizational climate theories is complemented with semi-structured interviews involving 22 employees from different productive sectors. Interviews allowed to refine the construct of OCR and identify five organizational factors characterizing a recovery climate: management of workload, social support, autonomy, availability of recovery resources, and leadership support. By conceptualizing OCR, this paper contributes to the literature on employee well-being and offers practical recommendations for organizations to foster recovery-supportive climates. Future research should focus on developing measurement tools, assessing the impact of OCR, and designing interventions to enhance employee well-being and productivity.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.Sanz-VergelA. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
2.
BennettA. A.BakkerA. B.FieldJ. G. (2018). Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2217
3.
BinnewiesC.SonnentagS.MojzaE. J. (2009). Daily performance at work: Feeling recovered in the morning as a predictor of day-level job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.541
4.
BüchlerN.ter HoevenC. L.van ZoonenW. (2020). Understanding constant connectivity to work: How and for whom is constant connectivity related to employee well-being?Information and Organization, 30(3), 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100302
5.
CarnevaleJ. B.HatakI. (2020). Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research, 116, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.037
6.
ChawlaN.MacGowanR. L.GabrielA. S.PodsakoffN. P. (2020). Unplugging or staying connected? Examining the nature, antecedents, and consequences of profiles of daily recovery experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000423
7.
DarrW.JohnsG. (2008). Work strain, health, and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012639
8.
de BloomJ.KinnunenU.KorpelaK. (2015). Recovery processes during and after work. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 57(7), 732–742. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000475
9.
Di FabioA. (2018). Occupational fatigue exhaustion recovery (OFER) scale: Primo contributo alla validazione della versione italiana [occupational fatigue exhaustion recovery (OFER) scale: First contribution to the validation of the Italian version]. Counseling. Giornale Italiano di Ricerca e Applicazioni, 11(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.14605/CS1111807
10.
Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.). (2023). Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development in Organizations. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
11.
FritzC.LamC.SpreitzerG. (2011). It’s the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers’ energy management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.63886528
GerhardtC.SemmerN. K.SauterS.WalkerA.de WijnN.KälinW.KottwitzM. U.KerstenB.UlrichB.ElferingA. (2021). How are social stressors at work related to well-being and health? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10894-7
14.
GeurtsS. A. E.SonnentagS. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 32(6), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1053
15.
GlickW. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279045
HartungP. J.Di FabioA. (2024). Sustainable development: A fourth paradigm for twenty-first century careers. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241287739
HuangL.TsaiH. (2024). The effects of recovery experiences on hotel employees’ subjective well-being, organizational citizenship behavior, and task performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103798
20.
IdrisM. A.DollardM. F.WinefieldA. H. (2011). The effect of globalization on employee psychological health and job satisfaction in Malaysian workplaces. Journal of Occupational Health, 53(6), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.11-0035-FS
KarabinskiT.HaunV. C.NüboldA.WendscheJ.WeggeJ. (2021). Interventions for improving psychological detachment from work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(3), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000280
23.
KennyM. E.Di FabioA. (2024). Decent work and decent lives in organizations for healthy lives. In Di FabioA.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainability and sustainable development in organizations (pp. 74–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003212157
24.
KimS.ChoS.ParkY. (2022). Supplemental material for daily microbreaks in a self-regulatory resources Lens: Perceived health climate as a contextual moderator via microbreak autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000891.supp
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer.
27.
MeijmanT. F.MulderG. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In Handbook of work and organizational: Work psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 5–33). Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis.
28.
NielsenK.NielsenM. B.OgbonnayaC.KänsäläM.SaariE.IsakssonK. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work and Stress, 31(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463
29.
OhlyH.WhiteM. P.WheelerB. W.BethelA.UkoumunneO. C.NikolaouV.GarsideR. (2016). Attention restoration theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. In Journal of toxicology and environmental health - part B: Critical reviews (Vol. 19, Number 7, pp. 305–343). Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155
30.
OuyangK.ChengB. H.LamW.ParkerS. K. (2019). Enjoy your evening, be proactive tomorrow: How off-job experiences shape daily proactivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(8), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000391
31.
PeiróJ. M.SteinebachC.FosterL.Di NuovoS.CarrusG.GutiérrezG.Di FabioA. (2025). Decent work, decent lives, and healthy lives for sustainable development. Australian Journal of Career Development, 34(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162251374443
PietkiewiczI.SmithJ. A.PietkiewiczI.SmithJ. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
34.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing (2nd ed.): The art of hearing data. SAGE Publications, Inc.
SchneiderB.BowenD. E.EhrartM. G.HolcombeK. M. (2000). The climate for service: Evolution of a construct. In ShkanasyN. M. A.WilderomC. P. M.PetersonM. P. (Eds.), Hand-book of organizational culture and climate (pp. 21–36). Sage.
SchneiderB.González-RomáV.OstroffC.WestM. A. (2017). Organizational climate and culture: Reflections on the history of the constructs in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000090
41.
SiegelR.KönigC. J.LazarV. (2022). The impact of electronic monitoring on employees’ job satisfaction, stress, performance, and counterproductive work behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 8, 100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100227
SonnentagS. (2018). The recovery paradox: Portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.002
44.
SonnentagS.ChengB. H.ParkerS. L. (2022). Recovery from work: Advancing the field toward the future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355
45.
SonnentagS.FritzC. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204
46.
SonnentagS.VenzL.CasperA. (2017). Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next?Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000079
47.
TakeuchiK.OsamuS.LahotiS.GondorD. (2017). Growing up: 10 years of publishing Sustainability Science research. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0484-7
48.
TeetzenF.KlugK.SteinmetzH.GregersenS. (2023). Organizational health climate as a precondition for health-oriented leadership: Expanding the link between leadership and employee well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(June), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181599
49.
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. A.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
50.
WinwoodP. C.WinefieldA. H.DawsonD.LushingtonK. (2005). Development and validation of a scale to measure work-related fatigue and recovery: The occupational fatigue exhaustion/recovery scale (OFER). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47(6), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000161740.71049.c4
51.
World Health Organization and International Labour Organization. (2022). Mental health at work: Policy brief. In Mental health at work: policy brief ISBN.
52.
ZappalàS.Martínez-TurV.MarianiM. G. (2018). Service climate in organizations: Validating the Italian version of the service climate scale (ISCS). TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 25(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM25.1.1
53.
ZappalàS.ToscanoF.BhartiD.PietrantoniL. (2024). Unveiling the relationship between flextime and job performance: The role of family–work conflict and the ability to Cope in a moderated mediation model. Social Sciences, 13(6), 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13060317
54.
ZijlstraF. R. H.CropleyM.RydstedtL. W. (2014). From recovery to regulation: An attempt to reconceptualize “recovery from work.”. Stress and Health, 30(3), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2604
55.
ZoharD. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(5), 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019
56.
ZweberZ. M.HenningR. A.MagleyV. J. (2016). A practical scale for multi-faceted organizational health climate assessment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039895
57.
ZweberZ. M.HenningR. A.MagleyV. J.FaghriP. (2015). Considering the Differential Impact of Three Facets of Organizational Health Climate on Employees’ Well-Being. Scientific World Journal, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/407232
